|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Forum Rules | VB Image Host | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Territorial & Identity Issues Irrendentism, regionalism, devolutionism, foralism, federalism, secessionism, ... |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
I think the question extends to Armenia. It is equally relevant to ask if Armenia is European, and I dont think much divides these two countries in that question.
Are they European? Its hard to answer. What does Europe even mean, and considering they are not normally considered European, what definition does that imply? And the "modern view" of Europe, which includes Turkey (but not always Georgia/Armenia) doesnt help much, either.
__________________
|
|
||||
|
I don't know much about either Armenia or Georgia but I would say one important measure of their European-ness would be the extent of interaction with other European nations throughout their history. Did they have closer links with the Ottomans and Persians than with Europe?
|
|
||||
|
We are talking of monophysite Christianism, which is unrelated to Graeco-Roman Christendom.
__________________
'Dardanidae duri, quae uos a stirpe parentum prima tulit tellus, eadem uos ubere laeto
accipiet reduces. Antiquam exquirite matrem: hic domus Aeneae cunctis dominabitur oris, et nati natorum, et qui nascentur ab illis.' We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. –Plato– |
|
||||
|
Why would there be such a unified thing as "Graeco-Roman Christendom"? I don't think it exists. We might as well quarrel over which one is the true church, the Roman Catholic Church or the Eastern Orthodox Church.
__________________
Den västerländska traditionen kan man vara trogen bara genom att ifrågasätta den med förnuftet som måttstock. Svante Nordin, Det pessimistiska förnuftet Wir haben eine ältere Offenbarung als jede geschriebene, die Natur. Friedrich Schelling, Über das Wesen der menschlichen Freiheit |
|
|||
|
Georgians are not Monophysites, but Eastern Orthodox, just like Russians. Armenians are Monophysites.
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
But I presume that this has nothing to do with the reasons why you started this thread. The issue arises from drgs's answer to the question "Are Georgian Europeans?". Which he gives simply as "second oldest Christian country after Armenia". In its simplicity, such answer to that question is highly open to interpretation and as such of a polemical nature. Beware that when I refer to [European] Christendom this is not any theological creed. So we are not likely to be needing the celebration of any religious council around it. But it is certainly open to discussion.
__________________
'Dardanidae duri, quae uos a stirpe parentum prima tulit tellus, eadem uos ubere laeto
accipiet reduces. Antiquam exquirite matrem: hic domus Aeneae cunctis dominabitur oris, et nati natorum, et qui nascentur ab illis.' We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. –Plato– Last edited by Menydh; Sunday, July 6th, 2008 at 13:28. Reason: typo: transubstantion -> transubstantiation |
|
||||
|
That is an interesting distinction right there. That would help explain why the Armenians seem to be in cultural communion with the Christians of the Persian and Arab world while the Georgians seem to culturally face the other direction, toward the Orthodox world.
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
I don't see any reason not to regard Georgians as Europeans.
__________________
Den västerländska traditionen kan man vara trogen bara genom att ifrågasätta den med förnuftet som måttstock. Svante Nordin, Det pessimistiska förnuftet Wir haben eine ältere Offenbarung als jede geschriebene, die Natur. Friedrich Schelling, Über das Wesen der menschlichen Freiheit |
|
||||
|
Quote:
I know most of the icons in Serbia and Bulgaria in mediev al monasteries were originally made by Georgian Iconographers and that alot of the designers of monasteries in Serbia and Bulgaria were Armenians. After the Ottomans spread into Europe, to me at least, it seems that Georgia interacted more with the Turks and Persians. The Armenians continued to have interaction with Europe, all be it at a decreased and mostly commercial level. I wouldn't consider Georgians Europeans given the pro-Turkish nature of the Georgians now. To me they seem like a non-Muslim variant of Albanians. Armenians. I don't really have an opinion on.
__________________
|
|
||||
|
I would consider Armenians as being more European then Georgians. I rembmer a few months ago BBC did some report on Georgia wanting to join NATO, and just the way they desperately were talking about how "European" they are, how they belong in Europe (i.e. in NATO and EU) made me think, "If they really were European or felt European then the local populace wouldn't be trying so desperately to present themselves as such."
__________________
|