|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Forum Rules | VB Image Host | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| South Balgarski, Hrvatski, Makedonski, Slovenščina, Srpski, etc. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() The names are Albanian and have been PROVEN by historians, and those pre-date slavic invasion in the balkans! Serbs are trying to change the words...for instance when some Albanian last names are Lulgjuraj, they make it Luldjurovic...Just like they make Gjakova to Djakovica, Gjak means blood! Also, if you see anything wih "Dj" in Kosova it is "Gj" so it probably means something in Albanian! |
|
|||
|
You thing you are Illyrians?? HAHAHA! Turks masacred population and settle your country! You are 10-20% Illyrians...
|
|
||||
|
Hrdina, I don't think so. Rather, they submitted to the Ottomans and converted to Islam. Which is why the Turks didn't massacre them.
And that's the problem, that they are a pro-Turkish people.
__________________
'Dardanidae duri, quae uos a stirpe parentum prima tulit tellus, eadem uos ubere laeto
accipiet reduces. Antiquam exquirite matrem: hic domus Aeneae cunctis dominabitur oris, et nati natorum, et qui nascentur ab illis.' We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. –Plato– |
|
|||
|
Quote:
IMO, if they were truly Illyrians, then the mtDNA test would show significant difference form the Y-chromosome test. That would mean that Turks killed or banished big part of male population and raped or intermarried with the great part of female population.
__________________
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
where you get info? acroding one european organization Albanians are 91% Illyrians heritage, 5% ancient greek. Soon will be article here![]() Quote:
I have one evidence that yogoslavian and turks seem 42% similarity with genetic? do you think yogos are turks?? fact is turks (not all) today are by albanian/bosnkak/other slavs/romanian/greek ect origin. p.s nice albanian name Bardhylis (mean WHITE) ![]() Last edited by Menydh; Wednesday, June 20th, 2007 at 13:53. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
For this, try a forum with an ethno-cultural affinity: Turkish Forum Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Stormfront White Nationalist Community
__________________
'Dardanidae duri, quae uos a stirpe parentum prima tulit tellus, eadem uos ubere laeto
accipiet reduces. Antiquam exquirite matrem: hic domus Aeneae cunctis dominabitur oris, et nati natorum, et qui nascentur ab illis.' We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. –Plato– |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Table 1. shows frequencies (in percent) of the haplotypes found in the examined European populations. Observe the Albanian part and then the Turkish one... Yugoslavs don't exist, so they cannot be similar to Turks, but please, show me your genetic evidence... Turks indeed did brought people of the Balkans to Turkey by force(Jannisary), but their contribution to Turkish gene pool is barely worth mentioning. We already discussed this matter here. Anyway, Bardyllis means "The white star" in the language of the Illyrians.
__________________
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
But if you read it carefully, you will see this: "We used 11 biallelic markers in this study, but there is still a need for more. For instance, HG 2, constituting 22% of the total sample and as much as 49% in the sample from Yugoslavia, is poorly defined and therefore constitutes a potential source of error in our analyses, since equal weight is given both to this and to well-defined HGs. The pace of new marker discovery is increasing (Underhill et al. 1997; Shen et al. 2000), and soon the resources will be available to adequately define all major European lineages." You see, HG2 marker isn't exactly a marker, but a group of markers. If you want to know more...
__________________
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
There is no evidence of mixing of Albanian with Turks in that study or in any other study for that matter. Study you provided(although outdated too,does give us some relative insight into whole picture) actually clusters Albanians with Greeks and Sardinians, distant from Turks. Last edited by Hrvoje; Wednesday, June 20th, 2007 at 20:01. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Of course there is no evidence. I was only making assumptions. I don't know... It seems unlikely to me that such large quantity of haplogroup J was brought to Albania in Neolithic. Anyway, I'm no expert on this matter, so I only wrote my thoughts. ![]() Quote:
Sorry, but I couldn't find a newer study on this subject.
__________________
|
|
||||
|
No. Keep it coming. It goes by IP range.
Quote:
All we can expect to hear from you here is that never mind all of the above because you are "white". For the nth time. The answer is who cares. You are far worse than many who are not. Accounts merged.
__________________
'Dardanidae duri, quae uos a stirpe parentum prima tulit tellus, eadem uos ubere laeto
accipiet reduces. Antiquam exquirite matrem: hic domus Aeneae cunctis dominabitur oris, et nati natorum, et qui nascentur ab illis.' We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. –Plato– |
|
|||
|
However, I found another study which says that the Albanians are similar to other Europeans, but this one is different from the first one, and I don't know how to interpret the results so.. Any volunteers??
![]() This study in its conclusion states: "The linguistic peculiarity of the Albanian population is thus not reflected in our genetic data. Actually, the AMOVA analyses reveal a general absence of genetic structure for both maternal and paternal markers associated with the differentiation of Indo-European linguistic sub-families in Europe (Table 4). This general lack of structure suggests either a very recent radiation of the major Indo-European language subfamilies from Europe, or the occurrence of large amounts of gene flow among European populations. Note that for mtDNA, the inclusion in the analysis of an Indo-European sample from the Indian sub-continent (Havik, Indic subfamily of languages)36 raises the levels of genetic structure observed, but these values are still not significant (FCT = 0.024, P = 0.305; ¼CT = 0.018, P = 0.126)."
__________________
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Are they there because of Turks too? :d Quote:
Quote:
P.S. Got it;Here friend, a must read study in regard to discussion. ![]() http://www.ftdna.com/pdf/AJHG_2004_v74_p1023-1034.pdf Last edited by Hrvoje; Wednesday, June 20th, 2007 at 21:19. |