Stirpes  

Go Back   Stirpes > Spirituality & Social Sciences > Religion & Theology

Religion & Theology On the Quest for the Higher Self and a Higher Being.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)     Quote this post in a PM
Old Thursday, August 10th, 2006
Alien
 
Last Online: Monday, July 2nd, 2007 22:27
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 862
Savage is a sage.Savage is a sage.Savage is a sage.Savage is a sage.Savage is a sage.Savage is a sage.Savage is a sage.Savage is a sage.Savage is a sage.Savage is a sage.
Default A view on the use of the Othal rune

Foreighn gods and Othala.

Denying the forfathers faith, is like insinuating that the forefathers and their beliefs was not good enough, and that they were stoopid and perhaps we need some foreighn beliefs?

What would the spirits of the forefathers say to that, if one should need them? Abrahamelin the Mage is into the topic, in his precautions to preparations to conjure and invoke spirits;

The book of Abrahamelin shoud be shun. Of three that reads it, one gets insane, one gets killed, and one handles it. Convertits or half-christians should lay far off, and rather so something safe, like surfin the roofs of the subs or climbing powerlines on rainy days.

In some occations the question of the right to use the Othala rune may be risen by the spirits. Allah or Jesus may be safer havens if the answers are not clear and good. For occational or decorative use I would not mind, but for magical use I would clear away any obscurities first.

My considerations for the use of Othala. Do I have my forefathers permission to what? Who owns the ground that I do it at? Telepathic permissions may of course do.

Eventual discussions should be taken at forhand with the forefathers and the spirits of the rune, and of course its principal, Odin.

A reasonable deal?

How can one expect a postitive reaction from runic spirits if one adores a God that condemns the runic, or norse pantheon and its spirits?

The same problem occurs the other way. My grandfather learned me some healing based on secret biblical traditions. Worked very well until I realized I could not invoke Jesus without getting a very bad taste of confusion afterwards.

I had to blote that art, and tried to develop new technics based on norse, gnostic, roman, greek, kabbalic, Egyptian, zoroastic, buddi, enochian , sami, and jungian cross references.

As I discovered I create the universe myself, I may invoke any kinds of gods, for their special use. If I work on a client which is a half-christian, or are closest linked to kabbalic spheres or ideas, I may invoke through that pantheon.

Of course dedication to one single pantheon could enflame one more, and maybe make one more blissful, but heaven will still be there, it can wait…

A Jungian view

The Jungian definition of pantheons, planets and elements as archetypes gives modern humans a brilliant option to eat the bite of the hook. Jung catches and formulates the essence of religion without getting religious.

The Jungian view gives also an idea on how to compare and classify religious, mystical and magical ideas, and syntisize it into a personal system, for those that also has a sunstrife of Nietsche.

Of course we live in the 21. century, and do not belive in magick and spirits and such, this is all ment as symbols and archetypes…

"- I do not believe in spirits... They are so full of lies..."

Last edited by Savage; Thursday, August 10th, 2006 at 00:26.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)     Quote this post in a PM
Old Thursday, August 10th, 2006
Alien
 
Last Online: Monday, July 2nd, 2007 22:27
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 862
Savage is a sage.Savage is a sage.Savage is a sage.Savage is a sage.Savage is a sage.Savage is a sage.Savage is a sage.Savage is a sage.Savage is a sage.Savage is a sage.
Default Re: A view on the use of the Othal rune

Decent dedication

The forefathers should be handled with respect, with the best intentions, attitude and preparations.

So should any god or spirit invoked. I have refused candidates admittance to the Temple because they were dirty. If they were homeless, and not had a place to clean themselves, it could have passed. But when working with high arts, it requires that one does ones best in all manners.

Also, in temples, peoples energy may be rather floating, so one should pick with care what energies one like to blend with.

I had a client that had asked for a Jupiter séance. It was set up for him, but during the séance he signed discreetly that he had an appointment, and that we should finished soon. I rounded the séance diplomatic, excused, and closed the temple, with my most benevolent will.

I shall not say what happened to him that forgot to respect the high gods, but fortunate he recovered within less than one year. One should not always underestimate the invoked forces, specially as the seance is still running.

Dedication and focus are normal standards if one want to talk to somebody, not the less when it comes to the spirits of the forefathers, or the mighty gods. One do not ask for a personal audience, and then hurries to finish to get off to drink beer.

Vitalizing energies
The Jule-three is a good sample on hounouring the forefathers. At midtvinterblot the forefathers spirits are invited to the party by taking energy from the sacrificed three. The same traditions are known in China for thousands of years. The energy of evergreen threes makes them very lively.

Also symbolical dishing up food and drink for them may work more than symbolic. If it gets properly dedicated to certain spirits, no others spirits will touch it, and the chosen ones can use the energies of it to manifest, or rather get the substance they need to keep attention to the world of the living.

I am sure one should be honest and respectful when dealing with them.

On the other hand, when Odin dealed with the giant, they both cheated and Odin won. When trading with the Devil it may be a question of symbiotic cheating. The spoon should however be long....
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)     Quote this post in a PM
Old Thursday, August 10th, 2006
Alien
 
Last Online: Monday, July 2nd, 2007 22:27
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 862
Savage is a sage.Savage is a sage.Savage is a sage.Savage is a sage.Savage is a sage.Savage is a sage.Savage is a sage.Savage is a sage.Savage is a sage.Savage is a sage.
Default Genius and the genes

The strange thing, is that for awakening elementals, even on Norwegian soil, also kabbalic keys or formulars works well, so does old greek and egyptian ones.

One should not believe that receipts that has been public for long times, and are easy availble for anybody, "really" should work, but they may do. It depends on the operators dedication and abilities.

And one should not believe that one that are not dedicated to IHVH, should be able to awake, manifest and control spirits in the name of Adonai? But no problem, it is a question of the angle of view.

The key to use of any pantheon lays in the knowledge and conversation of the Holy Guardian Angel, later revealing selfilluminative enough why the greek description of this principe is Genius.

Unlike other angels, that find their places within an organized and balanced system, Genius is the Creator of the universe. The personal Genius, or HGA, are in some such mystical/magical marriages been replaced by avatars like Muhammed or Jesus, also useful to certain degrees, but implying their keys, receipt, solutions and angle of view.

Some but for some it is nescessary, and optional, to go to the source oneself.

Genius are the candidates "individual" creator of the Universe, and also all pantheons, as all occures within the candiates brain. A terrible responsibility?
The full absorbation of this exeedment occures gradual and takes long time and efforts.

But back to the circus, I am rather impressed of the elementals ability to respond to foreighn languages and formulars. Quite adaptable to such outer shapes I would say

Rudulf Steiner is an example of a spirit that developed himself according to such principes. However I cannot understand that he did not imply a personal genius in his theosophy, but fall to the habits of the former stages of mental development, naming Genius " the Christ-consciouness".

Perhaps the main reason the most antroposophers are like confused fruitcakes? Steiner was a Pisces, so it is also on that reason understandable that he fell to stick the groupsouls already established paths and keys, but if Steiners evangeliumg should be really potent, he should for any price have avoided to plagiate, but formulated an original evangelium.

The sources of originality ori-ginal are in Genius, so are genes. At least in an esoteric sense.

Last edited by Savage; Thursday, August 10th, 2006 at 19:06.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
None


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A view on Ireland Aptrgangr Politics 4 Friday, May 11th, 2007 22:04
What is Your World View? Nerthus Atrium 26 Monday, November 7th, 2005 14:08
Rune from Denmark RuneDK Introductions & Farewells 12 Sunday, August 28th, 2005 10:22
Corporativism - your view Gil Economics 6 Tuesday, February 15th, 2005 19:58
Your view on Tourism Gil Atrium 40 Saturday, February 5th, 2005 15:04

Locations of visitors to this page

All times are GMT. The time now is 18:47.

Page generated in 0.2936101 seconds with 16 queries.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0