Would you accept the immigration of...

[Cristoforo]

I am making this poll to have an idea of what type of immigration is acceptable to most of us. Please vote in the poll.

[Prinz Eugen]

I accept White people from Europe and non European countries!

[Oskorei]

People of similar racial stock as already exists in Scandinavia.

Other Europeans can be accepted as well, for example those who already live here, but preferrably not in any large numbers.

[Ederico]

I voted no one because of Malta's demographical characteristics, however I also voted other European people if someone has to immigrate. In general, people of European heritage who have lived for a significant period in Europe's ex-colonies (America / Australia / et cetera) do not integrate well. Not even Maltese Emigrants who have lived a significant period of their lives in such ex-Colonies act like regular Maltese, and in general they do not act in a European manner either.

[Faísca]

One thing needs to be defined, in my opinion. Are we talking about mass immigration?

[Cristoforo]

Originally Posted by Johannes

One thing needs to be defined, in my opinion. Are we talking about mass immigration?

No, I am talking about an assimilable immigration.

[Oskorei]

Originally Posted by Cristoforo

No, I am talking about an assimable immigration.

If we are talking 1-2 persons, I'd even accept Chinese people

[Faísca]

Originally Posted by Cristoforo

No, I am talking about an assimable immigration.

I guess I would accept other European people then. I also voted no one, for I would accept, but prefer if it didn't happen.

[Cristoforo]

Originally Posted by Oskorei

If we are talking 1-2 persons, I'd even accept Chinese people

Well, let say I am talking about 10 immigrants for every 10,000 natives.

[Awar]

Bah, I voted for 'no one' because I thought you meant mass immigration

As for assimilable, I'd accept anyone who's nearly the same race.
By assimilable, I mean very small quantities.

Not like anyone would migrate into Serbia & Montenegro, but I voted, just in case

[Blood Axis]

I voted for "no one", simply because in the particular case of Greece, there are no more space & resources left for any kind of immigrants!

[Blood Axis]

Otherwise, I would not mind any other white Europeans, provided that they are clean and they respect the country.

But in this case, our boat is full & sinking. Really.

[Awar]

I promise I won't eat much when I go to Greece

[Zyklop]

Why should there be immigration at all?

[NatVox]

Originally Posted by Oskorei

If we are talking 1-2 persons, I'd even accept Chinese people

I warn you, those 2 Chinese have a family... http://forum.stirpes.net/showthread.php?p=4108

With a ratio 10:10,000 and only in the case that they are Europeans, for my country it means some 35,000-40,000 people in total. We have roughly twice as many of Germans, English, Dutch and other Europeans, and it is hardly perceivable except for some exceptions.

But being white means nuts to me. For example, a similar number of White Americans would be a disaster in cultural terms. However, among the Americans one must still distinguish between the Creole types and the Colonial types. By Creoles I understand those of very recent and clear European ancestry which have not lost their roots to the "White Mestizo" sub-culture of America. Conversely, the Colonials would be those with profound roots in America and who are a lost case as far as Europe is concerned.

Note: I know that many understand something different by Creole, but the word derives from Spanish Criollo which was used to designate the Spaniards born and/or raised (verb criar) in The Americas.

Originally Posted by Zyklop

Why should there be immigration at all?

Migration movements around Europe have been a constant throughout history, and they have had little to no incidence in the evolution and formation of the Nations of Europe. Or they have. But this incidence has been extremely positive in terms of adoption of new ideas and techniques.

However, those migrations have been very limited (I'm refering here to Modern Times) and that's why their impact have been positive. The problem comes with the modern facilities to travel and to move from one place to another, which should be solved among European Nations by setting a numerus clausus.

[Figlio della Lupa]

I voted "no-one" because as of now, I would concentrate on getting the native Italian birthrate up. In the future, I would allow a little, assimilable immigration from only other Europeans who wish to integrate themselves 100% into Italian society.

[Strengthandhonour]

Originally Posted by Figlio della Lupa

I voted "no-one" because as of now, I would concentrate on getting the native Italian birthrate up. In the future, I would allow a little, assimilable immigration from only other Europeans who wish to integrate themselves 100% into Italian society.

For example Figlio, what do you think about the large amount of citizens from the nation of Argentina who recently asked for Italian citizenship? Do you consider that type of immigration acceptable? I mean, most Argentinians are of European decent, and 70% of Argentinians have claimed Italian ancestry. In terms, Argentina, cultural wise, is very similar to Italy, specially with foods.
Do you see this is as positive? This are pretty much people of the same racial stock as Italians, with Italian culture, coming back to live with their grandparents,uncles,aunts,cousins,etc?
I have also seen a project before in Latin America, by an Italian organization, trying to give out Italian scholarships to full blooded Italians in the Americas.