Would you accept the immigration of...

[Theobald]

Originally Posted by Mynydd

With a high R1b input, they are hardly Germanic, but Western types.

What has genetics to do with a meta-cultural construct ?
Do you think that there is such a great "racial" difference between Wallonia and Flanders ? To me this problem is mostly linguistic and cultural.

Originally Posted by Mynydd

Belgium is a construct

True. And mostly a British one.

Originally Posted by Mynydd

Flanders is Germanic. Walloons are not.

Walloons are Northern French in the first place (their primary dialect was a langue d'oïl), their ethnic composition is similar to Northern French areas (Nord, Picardy, Champagne, ...) and as such Germanic influence is very strong there (both culturally and ethnically).

[Krissi]

I'd only let germanic people into my country, no slavs or meds.

[Theobald]

Originally Posted by Mynydd

Many of those who have voted for "white people from non-European countries" are non European Colonials. And a few others who surprise me... and at least two others who don't.

I voted for "white people from non-European countries" but rather meant as "people of French descent from the Americas (and perhaps South Africa)". I'd actually like to see these people coming back to their homeland and discovering their real cultural heritage. I know someone (of Provencal ancestry ) from (Anglo) Canada who has learnt French and is going to move to France. Well, yet still about 15 millions...
Not to mention that if we are to deport millions of non-Europeans we will need other people and workers.

PS : Of course C*smao is not allowed to claim his French ancestry.

[Menydh]

Originally Posted by Krissi

I'd only let germanic people into my country, no slavs or meds.

With only Norwegians in 1999 accounting for over 5% of resident people in over 20 municipalities in my region (not counting other Scandinavians nor Germanics) and the majority in one municipality (Alfàs del Pí), I fail to see how we Spaniards are the problem to a country like, say, Iceland.

I'm starting to grow a reciprocal feeling here.

[Krissi]

Originally Posted by Mynydd

With only Norwegians in 1999 accounting for over 5% of resident people in over 20 municipalities in my region (not counting other Scandinavians nor Germanics) and the majority in one municipality (Alfàs del Pí), I fail to see how we Spaniards are the problem to a country like, say, Iceland.

I'm starting to grow a reciprocal feeling here.

It's not that I don't like other "whities", it's just that Iceland is a small country (under 300.000 residents). If I was in charge I'd let no one settle down in my country but I think it's unwise to completly close countries from foreigners so the only people I'd let in would be another Scandinavians/Germanics.

First of all I am a nationalist but I guess you guys could also call me Sub-Racialist

[Menydh]

Krissi, on an ideal world I would.. oh, never mind... we don't want this to go out in the open, do we? ´
´
Let us just say that we must focus on first things first.

And, by the way, I care nothing about the wording "white". I am Valencian, Hispanic (Spanish), and only in last instance, European.

[Exeter]

Iceland had also a significant contribution from indigenous Brits. There is a matrilineal link with the British Isles. The male settlers were predominantly Scandinavian (Norse), according to the latest studies.

"These findings contrast with results based on mtDNA data, which indicate closer matrilineal links with populations of the British Isles. This supports the model, put forward by some historians, that the majority of females in the Icelandic founding population had Gaelic ancestry, whereas the majority of males had Scandinavian ancestry."

http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AJH...00/001900.html

Originally Posted by Krissi

If I was in charge I'd let no one settle down in my country but I think it's unwise to completly close countries from foreigners so the only people I'd let in would be another Scandinavians/Germanics.

[Krissi]

Originally Posted by Exeter

Iceland had also a significant contribution from indigenous Brits. There is a matrilineal link with the British Isles. The male settlers were predominantly Scandinavian (Norse), according to the latest studies.

"These findings contrast with results based on mtDNA data, which indicate closer matrilineal links with populations of the British Isles. This supports the model, put forward by some historians, that the majority of females in the Icelandic founding population had Gaelic ancestry, whereas the majority of males had Scandinavian ancestry."

http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AJH...00/001900.html

Yubb, I already knew that

Thanks to www.islendingabok.is, old Icelandic stories and some of my older relatives I've managed to trace my ancestors back to Norway, Denmark, Ireland and France. I guess some of them came from other countries but I cannot be 100% sure.

[Theobald]

Originally Posted by Krissi

I've managed to trace my ancestors back to Norway, Denmark, Ireland and France.

Normandy I guess ? (Brittany could also be a possibility...)

[Krissi]

Originally Posted by Theobald

Normandy I guess ? (Brittany could also be a possibility...)

Well, I was reflecting upon the modern names of these territories

[Laocoon]

People with your same colour.

It just strikes me now... What an absurdity! As if it was just a question of colour. Do african albinos should be accepted because they're paler than many europeans?

Theobald: French canadians? They are a really prolific people, we need some girls from there.

[Gil]

There is one option missing on the this poll:

"Only HOT women of European ancestry and ethnicity". I would vote for that right away (and not only me, I bet....)

Back to topic, the fact remains that immigration is a serious issue and cannot be defined by a simplistic poll.
In an utopic world I would gladly accept all types of turists and only a very strict number of immigrants (if any) and I believe that in certain aspects immigration can be a good thing but as it is today the trend is for third-world migrants to settle in Europe simply because most europeans are too lazy or uptight to perform certain jobs (at least that is the case here, which lead to the phrase "Trabalhar nas obras é para os pretos" which roughly translates into "working in construction (as in building construction) is for blacks").

[Englegast]

Limited immigration for me. Obviously only whites, and preferably of a similiar cultural background. If/when the UK breaks up, which I think it will, I would advocate an open border with Scotland and Wales due to the large inter mixture that already exists.

[Defensor Fidei]

I would accept the immigration of white catholics only.

[Defensor Fidei]

Originally Posted by Theobald

...but rather meant as "people of French descent from the Americas (and perhaps South Africa)". I'd actually like to see these people coming back to their homeland and discovering their real cultural heritage...

That would be REPATRIATION, not immigration. France is their homeland also, there is no question "would you accept them" - if you are true nationalist you MUST accept them.