Would you accept the immigration of...

[Aistulf]

I voted for the ones I'd allow, if any migration at all.

[Bulair]

I'd accept white europeans of course, there are already some english and german immigrants.I don't mind even the retired japanese, who have settled in the deserted countryside.

[Biggles]

I voted other Europeans .

[Graeme]

I voted for other Europeans and Whites from other countries. It is no skin off my nose as I live in Australia and it is unlikely I will ever return to live in Malta where I was born. Language is the problem. I don't ever want to live in the USA and I don't think I would fit into Canadian society. That only leaves the UK and those countries where English is like a second language. I voted for the Whites from other countries because as an Australian I am aware of the countries to the North which aren't White, have large populations and can be very sensitive. For example Indonesia and Malaysia. Also Australia has become too multiracial and multicultural since the loss of the White Australia Policy. Europe's problem is allowing permanent non European immigrants to live, work and acquire citizenship. It is a slippery slope to oblivion.

[Cato Censor]

Originally Posted by Figlio della Lupa

I voted "no-one" because as of now, I would concentrate on getting the native Italian birthrate up. In the future, I would allow a little, assimilable immigration from only other Europeans who wish to integrate themselves 100% into Italian society.

Avete Omnes.

I voted strictly europeans ( binded with Europa Mainland).

I think sincerly that it is impossible to getting up Italian birthrate sufficient fast in for the need to create a 'demic defence wall' against immigration.

It's an 'holy mission' to getting up the birthrate only because it's negative and because we are 'suffering' ( I dislike this term because I DO NOT LIKE AT ALL 'crying upom themself') a massive immigration of people with a low attitude to assimilation just to financial interest of a plebeian entrepreneurs class without responsability.

I would prefer using the force to 're-adjust' some little things that italian people knows ( one time ago it worked perfectly..) and remain absolutely no more that 60 millions. Better less Italians ( with coscience of their Root and Traditions), than a lot of crying 'italioti' with a reality-show tv pochade dayly brainwashed et cetera..

We cannot stop, with a realistic approach, immediately the 'river' of immigration, but we need to encourage european immigrant from "e.u." and east Europe to rebalance urgently the mass of strangers, that are absolutely unmatchable, from a spiritual and a "etnic" point of View, with Saturnia Tellvs and EVROPA.( when I refer to spiritual I don't mean 'religions' ) .

To close my intervention in the discussion, I state an Idea that I preserve and I will defend forever : CARTHAGO DELENDA EST.

Valete Optime.

CENSOR

[Il Legionario]

I voted 'no one' and 'other European'.

In the present situation Malta is unable to accept any more immigrants due to lack of space and resources. However, if resources and space were not a problem I would be ready to accept a small number of European immigrants only.

[Nemo]

At the moment America needs no more immigration, the country is now over populated by the large influx of 3rd world people, all immigration should now stop and all illegal 3rd world immigrants should be roundedup and deported.

In the future only people from European countrys should be allowed into America. the European immigrants were the backbone of this country and made it the great country it was, but in the last 30 yrs it is hitting rock bottom, and many predict eventually it will in the future become a 3rd world country.
We have to many mexicans,Paki's, Indians, Asians, you name it we got it the country is becoming a cess pool.
We also have allot of Africans, haitians, jamaicans and spics, the country has become a shit hole.

[Ederico]

Originally Posted by Scáthach

No-one.

Not even me... I need my Guinness

[Biggles]

Originally Posted by Ederico Figallo

Not even me... I need my Guinness

Hey you think you got it bad, if i showed up in Ireland id be shot, all for being English too .

[NatVox]

Originally Posted by Graeme

I don't ever want to live in the USA and I don't think I would fit into Canadian society.

No. I don't think you would fit in the US or Canada either.

Hello Graeme. Nice to see you around.

That only leaves the UK and those countries where English is like a second language.

English as a second language? Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Cornwall come to mind.

Europe's problem is allowing permanent non European immigrants to live, work and acquire citizenship. It is a slippery slope to oblivion.

Bad as it may be, it is always an advantage the fact that it is hard to hear from a non European saying "I'm French/Polish/etc". Exceptions to this are the British and perhaps the Dutch. I hear that in the US it is common that Mexicans say "I'm Spanish". Not surprising since Americans are not expected to tell the deceit. And not a point case here.

That retains on people the unmovable idea that they do not belong here.

[Figlio della Lupa]

Originally Posted by Cato Censor

Avete Omnes.

I voted strictly europeans ( binded with Europa Mainland).

I think sincerly that it is impossible to getting up Italian birthrate sufficient fast in for the need to create a 'demic defence wall' against immigration.

It's an 'holy mission' to getting up the birthrate only because it's negative and because we are 'suffering' ( I dislike this term because I DO NOT LIKE AT ALL 'crying upom themself') a massive immigration of people with a low attitude to assimilation just to financial interest of a plebeian entrepreneurs class without responsability.

I would prefer using the force to 're-adjust' some little things that italian people knows ( one time ago it worked perfectly..) and remain absolutely no more that 60 millions. Better less Italians ( with coscience of their Root and Traditions), than a lot of crying 'italioti' with a reality-show tv pochade dayly brainwashed et cetera..

We cannot stop, with a realistic approach, immediately the 'river' of immigration, but we need to encourage european immigrant from "e.u." and east Europe to rebalance urgently the mass of strangers, that are absolutely unmatchable, from a spiritual and a "etnic" point of View, with Saturnia Tellvs and EVROPA.( when I refer to spiritual I don't mean 'religions' ) .

To close my intervention in the discussion, I state an Idea that I preserve and I will defend forever : CARTHAGO DELENDA EST.

Valete Optime.

CENSOR

Great post, camerata.
Parole sante, anzi, santissime !!!

[Ingwaz]

Originally Posted by Mynydd

But being white means nuts to me. For example, a similar number of White Americans would be a disaster in cultural terms. However, among the Americans one must still distinguish between the Creole types and the Colonial types. By Creoles I understand those of very recent and clear European ancestry which have not lost their roots to the "White Mestizo" sub-culture of America. Conversely, the Colonials would be those with profound roots in America and who are a lost case as far as Europe is concerned.

Note: I know that many understand something different by Creole, but the word derives from Spanish Criollo which was used to designate the Spaniards born and/or raised (verb criar) in The Americas.

This is interesting. Are you speaking largely of Central and South America? In North America, the term 'Creole' is hardly used outside of Louisiana and from where I am in the far north, the term only conjurs up images of bayous, river-side shacks, cajun cooking and mixed-folk of varying degrees of European, African and Amerindian heritage. I do however, undertand the meaning of this term with regard to South America as described here under 'Latin American Creole':

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creole

Also of course, where I am from, the term 'Colonial' is entirely different from what you've written here. There is nothing mestizo about it and on the contrary, it refers to families, by and large of English but also Dutch and German stock, whose heritage pre-dates the Revolution.


As for the original question: I have no issue with immigration here as long as those who come are of Europid stock.

[NatVox]

Originally Posted by Ingwine

This is interesting.

Yes. It can be interesting.

To make it short, I consider that Anglo-Americans have an annoying inclination to degrade the original meaning of words that come into contact with them and which they never get to fully understand. Other words like Latin[o] or Hispano are also examples of this. Curiously enough this is something that North Americans share with many of their neighbours south of their borders.

So I feel free to go back to the origins of each and every of those words, be it in French/Spanish/Portuguese or Latin, and derive them to suit my taste. Which is still much more elegant than the forms in which they've been degraded in English-American speak.

[Anarch]

Anglos (and Irish) only. I can't vote that though. Anglos and Irish are those that would assimilate easily into Australian society and culture, apparently millions of Brits want out. I'd also take in the English and Afrikaners from South Africa. I have no problems with white Americans so long as they make half an effort to assimilate (half an effort is all that's required - Australia is part Americanised anyway, though it's still basically Australian). Oh, Blood Axis - if I were PM you would be keeping your wogs

[Scáthach]

Originally Posted by Mr Curzon Biggles

Hey you think you got it bad, if i showed up in Ireland id be shot, all for being English too .

Will you be trying it? j/k!

[Theobald]

I would accept all Whites, but in priority French-speaking people, and after Latins
But I don't want a massive immigration, only few Whites/Europeans (maybe 100 000 per year) who want to discover the French beauty

[Suoma-Tribal Hun]

One nation, one realm