|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Forum Rules | VB Image Host | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Politics Discussions on past and present political theories. Proposals of future political systems and amendments to the ones already in existance, and their application. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Perun excellent find.i cant think of anything to add...
Quote:
Last edited by Menydh; Thursday, December 30th, 2004 at 11:00. Reason: Please, shorten long texts when quoting other on the same thread. Thank You. |
|
|||
|
Hitler said he wasn't patriot but a german nationalist, because he didn't want to serve the austro-hungarian state and the habsburg family. So I think there are little diferences between both terms, but they are not exactly the same. Because when you say you are a patriot it may mean that you serve your current state, which is not always the same than nation.
|
|
|||
|
Patriotism and Nationalism go hand in hand.
nationalism "loyalty and devotion to a nation; especially : a sense of nationalnation above all others and placing primary emphasis on promotion of its culture and interests as opposed to those of other nations or supranational groups" patriotism "love for or devotion to one's country" To be a nationalist you must be a patriot. -Hiser |
|
|||
|
Quote:
The easiest way for people to understand the difference between these concepts is to look up their etymology. You don't have to be a patriot in order to be a nationalist. Being a nationalist means being faitful to your nation, while patriotism means being faitful to your country. These do not always coincide. Last edited by Aeternitas; Saturday, January 29th, 2005 at 20:51. |
|
|||
|
In German it is easier to tell from a nation and a country, in english it is not so.
The Word Nation refers to a group of people "who share common customs, origins, history, and frequently language" - in German we would use the word Volk. Country usually refers to a territory or region that is tied to a governmental body - in German we would use the word Land. I can be loyal to my people when not being loyal to my government, i.e. country. (or the opposite, which is not the case) |
|
||||
|
@Timo: perhaps it is easier for nations who are composed of different peoples, meaning "Ein land viele völker" (is that right? my german is nicht so gut after all this years, eehe) while nations who lack that "folk" diversity it's more common to correlate patriotism with nationalism. Personnaly I think nationalism describes dedication to one's people while patriotism describes dedication to the institution known as "Government" (like Bavarian Chick dixit
)Cheers
__________________
![]() |
|
|||
|
(you need help with your german genitive cases)
"A country of many peoples" That can be easily made: "A country of many nations." A nation need not have a government. The old word in english for a group of people with of common culture (etc.) was Folk. Though after the latinization of the language, the upper echelon of the classes used the word nation (latin based from French) to describe the groups of peoples. Thus Folk and Nation are both synonyms. Whereas Country and Nation have become clouded as almost synonymous in modern english, due to urban and globalization. Country is tied to the land and government, where as nation is tied to the people and culture. The Apaches of America were not a country but a nation. |
|
||||
|
damn mate, instead of praising me for even knowing a bit of german you go straight to the damn grammatical thingie....no i'm hurt and a flame war will ensue
![]() Well, I said I agree with the definition you proposed, what I also said was that perhaps that is appropriate in cases where one country has many nations/peoples/tribes etc in it, as for example modern day UK (which has welsh, scots, english and irish) and so many others while for example in other countries like Portugal or Italy that notion isn't very approriate because (generally speaking) the vast majority considers themselves to be one people (as a whole) and identify that people with the country.
__________________
![]() |
|
||||
|
Seems several folks here have no idea regarding the terminology they use. Pathetic indeed.
__________________
![]() For all flesh is as grass, and all the glory of man as the flower of grass. The grass withereth, and the flower thereof falleth away: But the word of the Lord endureth for ever. 1. Peter 1:24-25 Real misanthropes are not found in solitude, but in the world; since it is experience of life, and not philosophy, which produces real hatred of mankind. - Giacomo Leopardi (1798-1837) |
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
|
|
||||
|
ok
Quote:
Nations however have taken different forms throughout history and each nation stresses different elements over others. They're are multiple forms of nationalism(political, religious/secular, cultural, etc.). They are also different paradigms from which to approach nationalism and its formation(Primodialism, Perennialism, Modernism, Entho-Symbolism, etc.). There is much complexity to the issue, and nationalism' relationship to patriotism is just one aspect of it. Understand? I sincerly hope we can avoid trying to mock each other. ![]() Last edited by Perun; Sunday, January 30th, 2005 at 21:29. |
|
|||
|
i've missed out on a good chunk of this thread, however this issue was discussed on another forum, and my problem was that i couldn't really make out the difference between nationalism and patriotism.
although Bayerisches Mädchen said that one can exist without the other, and dismissed the alternative as "utter nonsense", the dictionary defines both words thus: na·tion·al·ism n. Devotion to the interests or culture of one's nation. The belief that nations will benefit from acting independently rather than collectively, emphasizing national rather than international goals. Aspirations for national independence in a country under foreign domination. patriotism n : love of country and willingness to sacrifice for it [syn: nationalism] personally i don't see the difference, therefore imho one would render the other superfluous. |