|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Forum Rules | VB Image Host | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Physical Anthropology The scientific study of the mechanisms of biological evolution, human adaptability and variation, and the fossil record of human evolution. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Thanks a lot for this interesting thread. Highly appreciated.
It must to check if the theory of the Brünn predominance among the population of the British Isles make sense according to the latest serious work about the physical anthropology of the British people I got from Don Brothwell. "EVIDENCE OF POPULATION CHANGE AND VARIABILITY IN THE BRITISH ISLES". From RASSENGESCHICHTE DER MENSCHHEIT. (1974). Anyway thanks again.
__________________
"With the miscegenation vary as much the form as the essence of the nations. The new foreign hereditary patrimony that circulates in the new popular organism, acts from now in the variability of the physical and psychic features of the group, from the more ordinary phenotypic and tenuous racial characteristics untill the highest spiritual capacities". ILSE SCHWIDETZKY, Grundzüge der Völkerbiologie. http://www.revistaidentidad.com/ http://www.id-press.eu/ http://www.editorialretorno.com/ |
|
||||
|
Great work! I appreciate a lot
Very though ichonographical research job. I think Inspired on Coon's work on one side but at the same part you updated the info with more recent discoveries (I'm thinking for exemple with the megalithic culture who Coon believed it came from somewhere in the east whence later datations shown to be older than the date Coon believed that mediterraneans and AM invaded Europe, by -3000)
__________________
|
|
|||
|
Well, you know Amorite and OEN what I think. I think your revival of the 30's is nonsense, especially since you cannot back up that shit in anyway except with "Races of Europe". Like said, genetics have replaced man-made pseudo science based on morphological and metrical traits alone.
This whole work, although nicely put, screams amateurism and the fact that you two have zero knowledge of principles of biology. Anyway, I cannot say I didn't enjoy your thread. Nice picture gallery. Although my general perception of English (Not necessarily British) is that they definitely lean more to the Nordid side. I liked the fact that you spoke about Nordid's, Phalians and Borreby -types as "Germanic derivived". That was excellent, after all these all types stem from the same root and have always breeded each other, "Borrrebies" Nordids and Nordids "Borrebies". Quote:
BTW Amorsite, I've rarely never seen you classify a person as "Nordid" as such. According to you they always have Brueen admixture or whatever. Yet you claim yourself to be bluntly "Nordic", would be nice to see an Argentinian Nordid for once. Could you make a thread of yourself? |
|
||||
|
__________________
'Dardanidae duri, quae uos a stirpe parentum prima tulit tellus, eadem uos ubere laeto
accipiet reduces. Antiquam exquirite matrem: hic domus Aeneae cunctis dominabitur oris, et nati natorum, et qui nascentur ab illis.' We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. –Plato– |
|
||||
|
Quote:
As much as you can despice the physical anthropology there are however some facts that cannot be denied; for instance you say that morphological traits is worthless but yet how do you explain that the scarce skeletons that the megalithic tombs of the western fringe of Europe correspond almost in their totality to the so called "Atlanto-Mediterranean"; or the fact that the skeletons of the earliest burials of England associated to hte "keltic" penetration fit morphologically with the so called "keltic" type? Quote:
![]()
__________________
|
|
||||
|
Carleton Coon was an American although he may have been of English descent. Even Coon did not think England is predominantly Brünn. As a whole the people in England look more continental or Scandinavian than the other nations of the British Isles. Some Scots fall in that category too. I'm sure people like Milesian would agree.
Some of the classifications are the same as mine. Lena Heady is one of them. http://forum.stirpes.net/anthropomet...na-headey.html |
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() I'll get back to you later, right now I am in a hurry. The basic assumption of 30's anthro was that metrical similarity equals relationships, total bollocks. Nordids and Alpines in Germany for example are genetically identical, yet thanks to Coon and buffoons like Amorsite and OEN we think they stem from different source. Despite the other has just inhabitet harsher living conditions few generation longer than his Nordid brother. Since I am busy I quote directly Polako from HBF, he is briefly illustrating how it's dangerous to make assumption based on morphological traits since they can change in such a short period of time thanks to nutrion and environmental stimuli. In parts of Germany and parts of Eastern Europe cephalic index's has dropped even 7 points in just fourty year. It would be ridiculous to start attain dolichocephalic son to a different racial source or timeframe than his Borrreby father (Coon's example) based on such a vague racial indicators as the formation of upper-lip, cephalic-index....etc "The heads and faces of Germans in the cities has lengthened by a great amount over the past 20 years. But genetically they are still the same as their parents and Germans in the country. The genes haven't changed. But the bones have changed due to a different diet and lifestyle." Anyway, I'll get back later. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
That's the riduclous stuff OEN and Amorsite insists. England is predominantly Nordid in the same sense as Norway f.e. |