|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Forum Rules | VB Image Host | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Modern & Contemporary History Discuss history from the French Revolution to current times. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Croatia's path towards national liberation started in 1990, when a nationalist party Hrvatska demokratska zajednica (Croatian Democratic Community), which at that time strongly favoured independence, won the overwhelming majority of votes in elections held in Croatia. Other political parties, as well as the great majority of the Croatian nation wanted to break free from the artificial multicultural country called Yugoslavia and to form an independent state. However, the structures of power of the Yugoslav Federation, dominated by Serbia, were fiercely opposed to any peaceful break-up for Yugoslavia, nay, they even envisioned a reform of Yugoslavia, whereby it should end up being even more centralized country, with all power residing and emanating from Belgrade. Especially the Yugoslav Army became the main exponent of such political tendencies. That army started to be increasingly felt as an occupation force by the majority of Croatian people throughout 1990. The political representatives of the Serb minority in Croatia also supported such political line, favouring the preservation of Yugoslavia and threatening with separation of the "Serbian" lands from Croatia, in case it declares independence. Their premises were clearly wrong because all the territories referred to as "Serbian lands within Croatia", were in fact ethnically mixed areas. None of these territories ever in history belonged to Serbia.
Quote:
Last edited by Marulus; Sunday, March 30th, 2008 at 16:54. |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
The attacks of Serbo-Yugoslav Army on Dubrovnik (1991-1992). The siege lasted for several months. The city was cut off from water supply and elecrticity during the siege.
Siege of Dubrovnik (Croatian: Opsada Dubrovnika) is a term marking the battle and siege of the city of Dubrovnik and the surrounding area in Croatia as part of the Croatian War of Independence. The siege was marked by severe bombardment of civilian targets, drawing much international attention. Dubrovnik is an old city located in the southernmost part of Dalmatia. It is a well-known tourist destination (a UNESCO World Heritage site), and was therefore demilitarized during the Communist Yugoslavia because it was considered that military presence does not go hand to hand with tourism. Because of this, when Croatia voted for independence in 1991, it was one of the few major cities in Croatia not to have major Yugoslav Army military forces in the area, which spared it during the September's Battle of the barracks (a Croatia-wide military operation in which Croatian forces - the nascent Croatian Army - stormed the barracks of the Serbo-Yugoslav Army in Croatia, took them and acquired weapons for struggle). Croatian military forces in the area at September were virtually non-existent and were severely outgunned as the heaviest weapons available to them were two Soviet 76 millimeter artillery guns from 1942. The defenders included just one locally conscripted unit - the 163rd Infantry Brigade, which - along with local police forces and volunteers - numbered less than 1,500 men and had no tanks or heavy guns. Towards the end of the year, the defenders were reinforced with the IX (9th) HOS Infantry Battalion of less than 300 men. The siege had immediately raised attention, as western reporters took pictures of the shelling (especially the Old City of Dubrovnik - a UNESCO World Heritage Site) - which drew international criticism of the forces of the Serbo-Yugoslav Army. The siege was heavily present in the international media, which pushed the pivotal and much more brutal Battle of Vukovar into second plan. International reactions did nothing to quell the brutal bombardment, however, and the shelling continued to the end of the year. Croatian Navy and coastal artillery had successfully repelled JNA Navy forces along Dalmatia, and the Yugoslav Navy withdrew to Montenegro naval base of Boka Kotorska, but the situation on the ground was still unfavorable. Towards the end of the year, Croatian defenders managed a small counterattack that was aimed at displacing the Yugoslav Army forces from the surrounding mountains, but this did not end the shelling entirely. Noted poet Milan Milišić became the first casualty of the shelling on October 5. On 6 December 1991, the heaviest shelling was reported on what came to be known as the St. Nicholas day bombardment, during which 13 civilians were killed and 60 wounded. The last ceasefire went into effect at the end of the year and the shelling ended by 1992. It was besieged and attacked by the forces of the Serbo-Yugoslav Army in late 1991, with the major fighting ending in early 1992 and the Croatian counterattack finally lifting the siege and liberating the area in mid-1992. The region south of Dubrovnik, know as Konavle, suffered especially heavy damages. The once thriving argicultural area turned into a heap of rubble, with houses, public buildings and churches razed to ground, everything looted. Only the city of Cavtat (the administrative center of Konavle) was spared of major destruction. Beginning of attacks
Attack on Dubrovnik: 1st day of attack
Bombings of Dubrovnik by the Serbo-Yugoslav Army
Resistance by the Croatian forces against the Serbo-Yugoslav aggressor (the film speaks of "Montenegrin units", by which units composed mostly of Montenegrins conscripted by the Yugoslav Army are to be understood)
Bombings of Dubrovnik (some scenes from the above videao are reapeated, but there is an explanatory introduction)
__________________
. Quote:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||
|
Eastern Slavonia was another front. The Serb minority living there (all areas being mixed there too) was used as fifth column against Croatia and in the interest of waging war for the preservation of the Serb-centered state of Yugoslavia. The heaviest one was the battle of Vukovar. The attackers found a fierce resistance from the part of Croats living there and for that reason battle lasted almost three months. The Serb-Yugoslav Army suffered heavy losses as well: more than one thousand dead, by their own admission. Some of the most brutal massacres (1, 2, 3) were committed there (in the Eastern Slavonia in general), with many mass-graves still being dug out. Aside from Vukovar, another goal of the Yugoslav Army was to occupy Osijek and Vinkovci, another two major towns of Eastern Slavonia. They falied in it due to almost suprahuman efforts of the defenders of these two towns. especially brutal was the siege of Osijek, because of the indiscriminate shelling of civilian tragets, as the result of which about one thousand people were killed.
The occupied parts of Eastern Slavonia were reincorporated into Croatia through the process of the so-called "peaceful reintegration", supervised by the UN (1995-1997). The most notoriously known and publicized (and for good reason) was the Battle for Vukovar. The Battle of Vukovar was an 87-day siege of the Croatian city of Vukovar by a multitude of Serbian forces during the Croatian War of Independence in 1991. During the three-month siege, the old city of Vukovar, located on the border of Croatia and Serbia on the Danube river, witnessed the most horrific devastation in its history, as well as numerous tales of human ingeniousness and endurance. The city was almost completely destroyed when it was finally occupied by the Serbian forces, and its Croat inhabitants exiled or killed.
__________________
. Quote:
Last edited by Marulus; Sunday, March 30th, 2008 at 21:14. |
||||
|
||||
|
The third front was Western Slavonia (a map of whole Slavonia, eastern and western). The war was less intensive in this area, no many massacres, unlike in Eastern Slavonia. The units of the Serb-Yugoslav Army crossed the river Sava in summer-spring 1991. They occupied many villages (the villages with Serb majority not yielding any resistance, but welcoming them as "liberators"), but stopped at gates of virtually all urban centers of the areas (Pakrac, Lipik, Slatina, Nova Gradiška, etc.), being unable to occupy them due to the fierce resistance of the Croatian forces. The occupied parts of the Western Slavonia were liberated in May 1995, by the Operation Flash, conducted by Croatian army and police units. One smaller part of the occupied territory was regained already in the end 1991/beginning of 1992, through the operation Orkan 91. The town of Pakrac and Lipik were especially savagely bombed, with many civilians killed. At the village called Bučje a small concentration camp was set-up where Croatian prisoners and abducted civilians were trotured and some killed (about 50?).
Serb-Yugoslav soldiers shooting at Pakrac, including its hospital and church, and bragging about it before cameras (subtitles in Serbian only, unfortunately, video was filmed by the Serbs). In the last sequence one soldier boasts that about 3000 grenades were launched and that every house must have gotten at least one (he shows his pride in this).
__________________
. Quote:
|
||||
|
||||
|
An article debunking the Serbian fabrication of the socalled Serbian Krajina:
KNIN NOT IN THE VOJNA KRAJINA
__________________
. Quote:
|
|
||||
|
The fourth front was Northern Dalmatia and Lika (roughly corresponding to what is marked as Šibenska, Zadarsko-kninska and Lička on this map). There too the Serbo-Yugoslav Army took the whole hinterland, in which there was Serb population in a certain percentage (but it was not a purely Serbian area). By means of destroying villages, expulsions and massacres (Škabrnja massacre being one of the most publicized ones) the area was ethnically cleansed. But here again the Yugoslav army did not manage to occupy cities, some of them, like Šibenik, yielded a fierce resitsance and repelled the aggressor. Nevertheless, here too there was indiscriminate shelling of cities as a result of which many people were killed in them (Zadar, Skradin, Biograd itd). However, most of the cities were not destroyed, but suffered only limited damage. The exception was the town of Gospić, whose occupation the Serb-Yugoslav forces saw as necessary i order to cut Croatia in two. Gospić was almost entirely destroyed by shelling, but - unlike Vukovar - did not fall to the enemy.
The whole area was liberated as result of the Operation Storm.
__________________
. Quote:
Last edited by Marulus; Sunday, March 30th, 2008 at 22:08. |
|
|||||||
|
The fifth front was the area of Kordun and Banovina. That territory was part of medieval Croatian-Slavonian kingdom, but during the Turkish wars it became deserted. To the deserted areas settled Serbs and Vlachs, who in that area were - along with Croats living there - soldiers of the Austrian Military Frontier. In this area the war was as savage as elsewhere, with the difference that all smaller urban centers were occupied as well. The Serb-Yugoslav Army penetrated as deeply into North as Karlovac and Sisak, but those (larger) cities managed to defend themselves.
This area too was liberated during the Operation Storm. From TV Belgrade: the reporter speaks about the "brave" acts of Serb-Yugoslav soldiers in that area (subtitles in Serbian only, but pictures as well say much)
Serbian soldiers deliberately shooting a church
__________________
. Quote:
Last edited by Marulus; Sunday, March 30th, 2008 at 22:09. |
|||||||
|
||||
|
Books:
Marcus Tanner: Croatia, a Nation forged in War Mass killing and genocide in Croatia 1991/92: A book of evidence (Croatia in the war. Civilian casualties in the war against Croatia 1991/92) - a book which deals extensively with war crimes, mass-killings and destruction committed by the Serbo-Yugoslav Army in Croatia in war 1991/1992; it will maybe be availabe on line soon; published in 1992, by the Croatian Ministry of Health External views and/or influences on the war in Croatia: Israeli media and the war against Croatia (1, 2, 3, 4) - deals with the extremely pro-Serbian bias of the Israeli media and the political establishment during the war in Croatia Army against the country - on the US involvment in the break-up of Yugoslavia, outlines connexions between some major figures in the administration of George Bush senior and some circles in Belgrade, connexions which might have played some role in the US policy of the preservation of Yugosavia at any cost and in their approval of the Serbian aggression started with that aim (ie. to preserve Yugoslavia) Carole Hodge: Britain and the Balkans, a book written by an English professional historian, showing the bias of the official British policy in favour of the Milošević's regime in Serbia in the nineties
__________________
. Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Destroyed churches (either by deliberately shelling or with explosives):
Systematic destruction of Catholic churches, abbeys and monasteries in Croatia (the thread once made by a member of Stripes who was banned - and with good reason - but these pictures are not his invention, but are taken from the webpage of the Croatian Conference of Bishops: HBK WWW Page)
__________________
. Quote:
Last edited by Marulus; Sunday, March 30th, 2008 at 19:52. |