Monolith

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKOGj...ture=rec-HM-r2

Uuuu, pa ajde daj to,znam da mozes, kao sto si i ove dao, svaka ti cast ...BTW, ja diplomirao pre dve nedelje :O! Po starom programu titula mi je profesor Civilne Odbrane a po Bolonji diplomirani menadzer Civilne zastite i zastite zivotne sredine, pa ti vidi ...A danas bio na lekarskom za vojsku, ustao ti ja u pola sest, trcao da stignem na autobus,odem tamo kada SELJACINE nisu imali psihologa i sada ponovo moram 27. jula da idem,a jeee, kakvi smaraci, ne verujem..To valjda samo pokazuje stanje u drzavi, kako je sve u kurcu i neorganizovano, a? Grrr..Jaooo, pa ti ces sada 4. godinu, jaoo pa nije li to divno

Ej, hej, eoo, sta se radi ? Kako si prosao na ispitima, jel sve bilo ok, si ih polozio? BTW, nista ti nisam javio za ono, jer me je keva nesto smorila, ne zna ni ona sta radi, pa i ja cekam da mi vec jedared javi . ALi, u svakom slucaju, hvala na zelji da mi pomognes

The stunt was achieved by making the owners (north-americans) believe that we are just a minority of 10 million complainers, while Brazilian represent some kind of righteous majority. In the limbo falls the former colonies in Africa who have been using our norms but are being indoctrinated in the Brazilian norms and dialects (which actually they embrace faster, due to Brazilian itself being a form of Portuguese pretty adapted to afro-phonetics, you can even say moulded by them).

The "problem" resembles a lot the lunacy of scholars wanting to make the world believe that there's a possibility of uniting European and American Portuguese (Brazil). The orthographic norms are impossible to conciliate, and they are already pushed to the limit for us. Nevertheless they want a complete unification which stirs anger here in Portugal. We are already writing Portuguese on a basis that serves them better. Portuguese Wikipedia is dominated by brazillians and they have enforced a policy of diktat. Since some months ago we can not even weite with our norms anymore.

Well. I've read here and there, that some scholars wanted to create by force a Srpskorvatski language in a diasystem. In the past you could even see the fierce debates in Wikipedia, because the Wikipedia leaders assumed that it was the "same language, period". Now they have managed to create a confuse system based in IP's and "first-served".

You misunderstood me in the last point. Since I see many people advocating an unification, I asked if it would not be desirable to keep up a Croatian language within the Croatian dialects (like in the Norwegian Nynorsk revival) rather than letting it merge in a sole Serbo-Croatian norm (Norwegian Bokmål is a Dano-Norwegian forced unification norm).

But as I can learn by your words it's largely exagerated than the unificated norm has been gaining terrain, right? And thus Croatian based in Croatian dialects is the trend?

If so, I think it's very good and healthy.

Yes, I've studied that, and I found written that Chakavian and Kajkavian are in decline. How do you see this? is it recent or is it Tito "work" still giving "fruits"?

Also what would you prefer? to see a Serbo-Croatian language unified around the Shtokavian dialect? or reviving the original Croatian dialects and basing norms upon them for a separate Croat language like it was done in Norway with "Nynorsk"?

"uff, podsjećaš me na staru. nekad mi je žao kaj ne studiram u nekom dalekom gradu, di bi živio u studentskom domu"

Zar ne, zar ne. I man may dream...

Svima nama ovo ponekad prolazi kroz glavu. Izrasli smo iz pelena više, tako izgleda

Jebes kolokvije... Nema toliko stresa!

Mene svi mrze i vole istodobno!

Dobar 3... Izvukao sam 3 pitanja i o svakom sam nesto znao kenjati.
Tvoje?