Is Europe too lenient with sentencing convicts?

[Ferran]

Is Europe too lenient with sentencing convicts?



A 15-year sentence for a man who imprisoned his daughter for 24 years has revived debate over Europe's lenient penal system.

VIENNA - Police say Josef Fritzl left a lot of human wreckage in his wake: the daughter he imprisoned and raped for 24 years, the seven children he fathered with her and the wife whose life he shattered.

Yet, for an atrocity that has stunned the world, he may wind up serving just 15 years in prison if charged, tried and convicted.

Practically speaking, that may translate into a life sentence for Fritzl, 73. But his case has revived a debate over Europe's lenient penal system - and whether harsher, U.S.-style sentencing guidelines might help deter such heinous crimes.

''Fifteen years for destroying human lives is unacceptable,'' said Harald Vilimsky, a public safety policy official with Austria's conservative Freedom Party. ''Any punishment that falls a single day short of a life sentence is a mockery of the victims.''

Many Europeans abhor the death penalty, and capital punishment is illegal across the 27-nation EU. But in many countries, even convicted murderers handed life sentences seldom serve more than 25 years.

In Germany, convicted rapists are punished with sentences of six months to five years. Serial cases, and those involving weapons or death threats, can fetch up to 10 years in prison - but also as little as 12 months.

Poland's maximum for rape is 15 years, and that would apply even for sexual assaults repeatedly carried out over two dozen years as alleged in the Austrian case. The standard time served? Two to 12 years.

''It's rare that anyone serves the full sentence in Europe,'' said James Whitman, a professor of comparative and foreign law at Yale. ''It's expected that people are let out early.''

In the U.S., by contrast, first-degree rape is punishable by up to life imprisonment in states ranging from Maryland to South Dakota.

Experts say Europe's shorter sentences - and its reluctance to jail people for offences considered minor, such as possessing small amounts of marijuana - help explain why its prisons are far less crowded than U.S. lockups.

The U.S. has the most prisoners per capita in the world, with 751 for every 100,000 people, according to the London-based International Center for Prison Studies. Most European nations trail far behind: Britain's rate is 151 per 100,000, Austria's is 108 and Denmark's is 66.

Fritzl surely would face a tougher prison term anywhere in America, and in some states maybe even the death penalty, said Dan Richman, a law professor at Columbia University.

In Italy, murder carries a minimum sentence of 21 years and a maximum of life. But life terms are rarely handed down in a system that emphasizes rehabilitation over incarceration, said Carlo Guarnieri, a justice expert at the University of Bologna Law School.

''The Italian system is very European and not American at all,'' Guarnieri said. ''In general terms, penalties are lenient. The general outlook of the court is in favour or rehabilitation, although today there is a lot of discussion that this doesn't work.''

In Austria, prosecutors are still mulling how to charge Fritzl, who police say confessed to imprisoning his daughter Elisabeth - now 42 - in a warren of windowless, soundproofed rooms beneath his home when she was 18 and raping her repeatedly.

They say Fritzl also admitted to incinerating the body of one of the seven children he fathered after the child died in infancy.

Authorities say Fritzl could face up to 15 years if convicted of rape. Prosecutors are looking into whether the retired electrician could be tried for ''murder through failure to act'' in the infant's death.

Austria's criminal code prescribes prison terms ranging from 10 to 20 years to life for murder - but in Austrian terms, a life sentence is interpreted as 20 to 25 years of confinement.

Courts also don't tack on extra time for related offenses, unlike in the U.S., where weapons charges or crossing state lines can add significantly to the time ultimately spent behind bars.

Fritzl has not yet been charged, but the most likely charges he faces are rape, incest and false imprisonment. If convicted of all three, he would serve the sentences concurrently and the maximum would be 15 years based on the rapes.

Potentially, it could be far less if he mounts a successful insanity defence. Either way, a trial could be a long way off: Police say their investigation may drag on for another six months.

Austria's justice minister, Maria Berger, said Wednesday the government will conduct a sweeping review of all sentencing laws and propose legislation doubling prison sentences for ''especially dangerous'' predators.

But Berger insists a more draconian approach probably wouldn't stop the next Fritzl.

''To this kind of perpetrator,'' she said, ''the severity of the punishment means nothing.''

Europeans frequently criticise the U.S. system, where first-degree murder and other heinous crimes are punishable by life without possibility of parole, or, in some states, death.

Many criticised this month's landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling that upheld Kentucky's three-drug lethal injection method and prompted other states to take steps to resume executions, a practice considered barbaric in Europe.

But Europeans have also been rattled by some singularly horrific cases that have challenged their approach to crime and punishment:

- In Spain, groups representing victims of the 2004 Madrid commuter train terrorist bombings that killed 191 people and injured more than 1,800 expressed outrage over last year's acquittal of the alleged ringleader, Rabei Osman. Although the three main figures were sentenced to tens of thousands of years in prison, four other top suspects got off with sentences of 10 to 18 years. Prosecutors are appealing Osman's acquittal.

- Belgium's notorious serial paedophile, Marc Dutroux, was on parole for raping schoolgirls when he committed a spree of child kidnappings, rapes and murders that eventually led to a life sentence in 2004. In theory, Dutroux eventually could come up for parole, though that's unlikely because a judge has pronounced him a danger to society and Belgium has toughened its parole rules.

Guarnieri, the Italian justice system expert, said his country's approach reflects its Roman Catholic culture.

''There is an attitude to forgive,'' he said.

''If you read the newspapers or watch TV, every time there is a crime, the journalist tries to interview the victim and ask if they are forgiving. Always.''

[AP / ANP / Expatica]



Source: Is Europe too lenient with sentencing convicts? - Expatica

[Marulus]

It is a question which also contains the answer in itself. Yes, it is extremely lenient. As if it were invented to protect the perpetrators and humiliate the victims. I think it is being done on purpose, there is an entire philosophy (quasi-"religion"?) behind that. In Italy, for example, there is an aggressive NGO named Nessuno tocchi Caino (meaning: "Nobody dare touch Cain"), which campaigns against death penalty and for "rights" of perpetrators of grave criminal acts. "Nobody dare touch Cain", but what about Abel? Sentences for murder have been becoming more and more lenient in the last decades. As if it were not something too hard.

But there is also other side of the coin: EU has surreptitiously introduced death penalty, believe it or not! It is in the Lisbon Treaty, which is scheduled to be accepted in all parliaments, without referenda. According to the infamous treaty in question, death penalty might be applied in times of war or civil unrest. And what is war? Any government could possibly declare that a country in question is at war because, let us say, it has a military contingent in Iraq, Afghanistan or somewhere else (having such contingent means that the country in question technically is at war, but it only depends on a political will whether or not it will be officially sanctioned). What is civil unrest? It may be up to a very broad definition. Under such circumstances death penalty may be reintroduced, not against murderers (because their crimes are unrelated to the state of war), but against political dissenters.

On one side leniency, on the other side preparations for an eternal state of emergency in which all measures (including death penalty) could be used in the defence of the system.

USA with its gulags is clearly a different case, it cannot be used as any model for the improving of the penal system in European countries.

L\' eurocrazia reintroduce pena di morte segreto

Demand referendum on EU Lisbon treaty