Are Muslim civilians really "innocent"?

[Arthur Gordon Pym]

+ YouTube Video

This video was released by a group that calls itself Jewish Task Force (Jewish Task Force: The JTF.ORG Home Page!). The articles and other materials released by this group enjoy a certain degree of respectability with the major (Israeli) media.

[Sergius]

Even from the Zionist point of view this is overwhelmingly one-sided.
What is clearly underlying is that terrorists need to be 'dealt with' - and by effectively declaring all Levantine Arabs (if not Islam as such), muslim or christian, as terrorists, he seemingly advocates --- genocide? Exactly what he accuses his enemy of.
And his comments on Iraq are too dumb even for me to respond to.

[Errigal]

His opinions are not at all rare among North American and Israeli Jews. I have heard the same views on radio phone-in programmes, in comments to newspapers and in person. He may be slightly extreme but he is far from unique.

[Cirrus]

Have you noticed how many time does he said the words "Nazi" or "terrorists" ?
But the thing is that he himself thinks like a terrorist, and even like a "Nazi".

"In a war as such there are no civilians" - Adolf Hitler

[bombadillo]

Originally Posted by Cirrus

Have you noticed how many time does he said the words "Nazi" or "terrorists" ?
But the thing is that he himself thinks like a terrorist, and even like a "Nazi".

It's supposedly okay for a jew, because of the "Holocaust," which seemingly provides justification for anything and everything done by Zionists. And as long as the US remains hegemon and provides unequivocating support to Israel, this deplorable state of affairs will continue.

[Errigal]

Originally Posted by Cirrus

Have you noticed how many time does he said the words "Nazi" or "terrorists" ?
But the thing is that he himself thinks like a terrorist, and even like a "Nazi".

"In a war as such there are no civilians" - Adolf Hitler

In a strange way I don't think words like "Nazi" and "terrorist" really have clear meanings for him; they just variations on the word "enemy".

People like him don't even understand what is the behaviour of a normal nation and a normal human being. The term "recognize Israel's right to exist" pops up all the time with Zionists but notice how the speaker in this video will not recognize anyone else's right to exist.

[bombadillo]

Originally Posted by Errigal

The term "recognize Israel's right to exist" pops up all the time with Zionists but notice how the speaker in this video will not recognize anyone else's right to exist.

A point worth a bit more elaboration: to the Zionist, and to his American backers, the Palestinian in particular, and the Arab in general, do not exist ontologically as human beings. They are a nuisance, a rabble, a herd, "extremists" and "terrorists" (when they demand equity and reasonable treatment) but never humans. In the Zionist and the ruling-class US mindset, they -- and only they -- have the right to dictate terms (which by their definition are always eminently reasonable and equitable), and anyone questioning this has to be put down relentlessly by armed force (as they are automatically, and by definition, "extremists" and terrorists"). I know it sounds mad -- it probably is -- but there it is: a mix of Orwell's "1984" and Kubrick's "Dr. Strangelove."

[Arthur Gordon Pym]

Originally Posted by bombadillo

A point worth a bit more elaboration: to the Zionist, and to his American backers, the Palestinian in particular, and the Arab in general, do not exist ontologically as human beings. They are a nuisance, a rabble, a herd, "extremists" and "terrorists" (when they demand equity and reasonable treatment) but never humans. In the Zionist and the ruling-class US mindset, they -- and only they -- have the right to dictate terms (which by their definition are always eminently reasonable and equitable), and anyone questioning this has to be put down relentlessly by armed force (as they are automatically, and by definition, "extremists" and terrorists"). I know it sounds mad -- it probably is -- but there it is: a mix of Orwell's "1984" and Kubrick's "Dr. Strangelove."

Yes, and it is a principle that can be aplied to many other conflicts. Who ever stands on their way, is considered subhuman. Inhabitants of Dresden, Tokyo or Hiroshima are likewise considered today (and they were considered then) to have been a "bunch of Nazis" who deserved death. It is no coincidence that neocon political and military analysts constantly draw parallels between the present situation and the second world war. They glorify the massacres that the Allies had committed then (no sign of repentance or any sort of moral qualms) and deplore the fact that there are, in their opinion, too few massacres today. A truly satanic and criminal mindset. The same principle may be tomorrow applied to any other country or nation that would dare shake off the NWO burden off its back.