Quote:
Originally Posted by Seekers
Not good, of course. But I think it would be a mistake to assume that there is an ethic in a cultural sense behind things like that.
|
Of course there is no ethic in a cultural sense behind things like that. But many people think there is some ethic in imposing such nonsense and many "citizens" believe that it is ethical to obey such nonsense. They mistook ethics with the positive law. I met many people in my life who think that the opposition between good and evil equals opposition between legal and illegal (legal = good, illegal = evil). That is a monstruous spiritual perversion.
Muslims have great many ridiculous laws and regulations that regulate all possible spheres of life. But at least they think that these regulations come from God and must be therefore obeyed, while modern Europeans (and "Westerners" in general) religiously believe in laws brought by their worthless and sh**ty liberal-democratic parliaments, having no deeper metaphysical value than the majority of hands lifted.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seekers
Those are things of a kind that take over when ethics are no longer practiced, and some people of a nation employ a vendetta against rather innocent people of the same nation.
|
True. In the 18th century Ottoman Empire the ruling caste behaved sadistically with all its subjects, in the first place with the non-Moslem ones, but sometimes even with common folks of Moslem religious affiliation. It was popularly called
zulum (a loanword from Turkish, originally coming from Arabic, meaning "pressure"). It was a widely known notion in the Balkans as well. We could say that modern liberal democratic despocies are practicing
zulum.