|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Forum Rules | VB Image Host | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Introductions & Farewells Introduce yourself or softly bid farewell. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Also, I'd suggest that you read in a dictionary the definition of ethnicity and see how you can fit "white" (or "blue" or "pink" for that matter) in it.
__________________
'Dardanidae duri, quae uos a stirpe parentum prima tulit tellus, eadem uos ubere laeto
accipiet reduces. Antiquam exquirite matrem: hic domus Aeneae cunctis dominabitur oris, et nati natorum, et qui nascentur ab illis.' We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. –Plato– |
|
||||
|
Rough greetings, isn't it?
Anyway, Mennyd meant simply that we classify people according to land of origin. (For example, I'm northern italian, Marulus is croatian, Mennyd spaniard etc.). If you can fit in one of such mods just let us know, if you feel you are simply an american of white race and mixed european ancestry (as it is the case for most of you) you shall simply be an american. The gruff come from the fact that we do not share the same views as white nationalist from US, for whom "white people" and european are synonim. We try to differentiate between european nations.
__________________
Communism and socialism are so utopistically detached from the true nature of man that politicians and militants pursuing them are either criminals exploiting the gullibles of earth or they are just the worst among the honest politicians.
|
||||
|
|||
|
Still not the kind of greeting I expected.
Can I just say I'm a nationalist and lets leave at that? or should I just leave? Last edited by Heimdall; Wednesday, June 11th, 2008 at 20:22. |
|
||||
|
You did read and agreed to the rules when you signed in, didn't you?
rules:
__________________
'Dardanidae duri, quae uos a stirpe parentum prima tulit tellus, eadem uos ubere laeto
accipiet reduces. Antiquam exquirite matrem: hic domus Aeneae cunctis dominabitur oris, et nati natorum, et qui nascentur ab illis.' We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. –Plato– |
|
||||
|
Personally I have nothing against you, nor nothing against you being here (I'm speaking for myself) as long as you wouldn't be breaking any of forum rules. As far as I know non-nationalists are welcome here as long as they show respect to other members. By nationalists I mean people in line with traditional nationalism of European lands, not Americanizations of nationalism.
Quote:
__________________
"The two-party-system and the artificial division between left and right is especially malign because it confines people into mental prisons, from which they are almost not able to get out. Even in a one-party-system it is mentally easier to be "in the opposition", "against the system". In the two-party-system (which is in fact one-party-system as well), on the other hand, if the left is currently in the office and you are opposed to the system, it is automatically assumed that you are a "rightist", ie. supporter of the party of the right. And vice versa. Most people refuse to see that the two major parties are in fact one and the same party. Thus the liberal democracy, especially in its venomous two-party variety, is the most successful system of totalitarian manipulation ever invented. Each of the two parties usually has a very dedicated voting herd, needless to say." - "Marcus Marulus", Stirpes forum member |
|
|||
|
To be honest I'm just confused and I'm new to this philosophy.
There are so many different terms and names and I'm just confused at what to call myself. So what should I call myself? Or should I just leave it as a Nationalist? |
|
||||
|
The concept of 'nation' (and nationalism) is about ethnicity, not race. Germans, for example, are Germans and it's not a race (as Europid, which 'white' is supposed to mean - the term itself is Americanization anyway) that makes them German, but their ethnic origin. It's not like Americans (be them 'white' or 'black' or whatever color/race) who are not a nation as such, hence they can't be nationalists.
__________________
"The two-party-system and the artificial division between left and right is especially malign because it confines people into mental prisons, from which they are almost not able to get out. Even in a one-party-system it is mentally easier to be "in the opposition", "against the system". In the two-party-system (which is in fact one-party-system as well), on the other hand, if the left is currently in the office and you are opposed to the system, it is automatically assumed that you are a "rightist", ie. supporter of the party of the right. And vice versa. Most people refuse to see that the two major parties are in fact one and the same party. Thus the liberal democracy, especially in its venomous two-party variety, is the most successful system of totalitarian manipulation ever invented. Each of the two parties usually has a very dedicated voting herd, needless to say." - "Marcus Marulus", Stirpes forum member |
|
|||
|
ok, that makes sense.
So I'm of European descent...but I'm live in America so that means I can't be a American nationalist because Americans aren't a ethnicity? So does that mean I am a European nationalist? |
|
||||
|
You are a lost cause.
__________________
![]() 5 Stages of Acceptance: Denial: The initial stage: "It can't be happening." Ricardo is on top of me. Anger: "Why ME? It's not fair?!" (either referring to God, oneself, or Ricardo perceived, rightly or wrongly, as "responsible") Bargaining: "Just let me stay to post another day Ricardo, please." Depression: "I'm so sad, why are you picking on me Ricardo?" Acceptance: "It's going to be OK." There is always Skadi.
|
|
||||
|
Heimdall, have a look through the White Nationalism and the WASP subforum. "WN" is really a type of multiculturism opposed to nationalism.
|
|
||||
|
I think such currents as national-anarchism could have a very favourable impact on the nationalist-orientated American politics. It's been growing in Australia, for example, which I think shares some of the same qualities as North America as colonies of mainly European extraction.
The idea of autonomous communities would surely be a more realistic approach instead of a single, homogenous state, considering the circumstances. Oh and welcome. ![]()
__________________
Hän kuolee, eikä kuole hän. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| None |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|