|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Forum Rules | VB Image Host | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Introductions & Farewells Introduce yourself or softly bid farewell. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
My chief interests are the roman church and state, in possession of a dichotomous ideology with respect to europa. My personal creed about history is that the franks/germans/protestants & russians/slavs/orthodox have misappropriated themselves inheritance of the late roman empire. I am a classicist, ultramontanist, a mediterranean apologetic & polemic, in contraversial arguments with nordicists/alpinists. There are differences between roman and barbarian, but I realise that it is an unpopular (or quasi-defunct) establishmentary view of differences between europeans. I am sceptical of ethnolinguistics, class/caste sociology, evolution and atheism. I do not have a phobia of the "hamito-semitics", but rather bear more dislike for "ural-altaics"--if I am to express distaste via ethnolinguistics. My thoughts on jews would probably be offensive to both them and anti-semites, but not to civilised/traditional roman christians.
To certain people, I can be sort of dull. I was raised in a mostly canadien city, in a mostly mezzogiorno county. I like accordions and violins in my music. I like seafood, olives, cheeses, salads, crepes, wine and cider--but not beer. I have been anthropologically classified as mediterranid, but I don't know if I care about scientific racism. Apart from provincial adherence to the patrimonial identity of my ancestry, I am descended most recently from other related peoples in what was once under the occidental roman empire, as well as those of western barbarian heritage. Unfortunately, I find it difficult to quantify oriental roman and eastern barbarian heritage. I quite certainly do not care to embrace balkanist or separatist elitisms, or modern perceptions of polity and nationality. You will have to either adapt to my reactionary attitudes or ignore me. I refuse to change for anybody's illogical opposition ad romanorum. You may ask me polite questions or engage in flippant rhetoric, as I am sure would happen anyways, without my consent in direction at my person or creed. You may abuse or vilify me for being unfit or impure, but I registered after viewing some posts that indicated barbarian supremacism is not welcome here. I am used to being in the minority among teutonicist liberals, a presence that sometimes makes me nauseous and angry as an "ethnic white". From agriculture to blue collar employment, that is a short economic history in ma familia. Last edited by Menydh; Friday, August 24th, 2007 at 21:14. Reason: delete personal picture as per user request |
|
||||
|
Welcome to Stirpes.
Interesting and diverse views. Explain this mediterranean apologetic deal you mentioned please.
__________________
"I failed my metaphysics exam when my teacher caught me looking into the soul of the boy next to me" Some find it in a flag, some in the beat of a drum Some with a book, and some with a gun Some in a kiss, and some on the march But if you're looking for Europe, best look in your heart -Sol Invictus
|
||||
|
|||
|
Merci beaucoup. The arrogation and bastardisation of Rome is the only "fault with Rome". Syntheses have corrupted the innate Trojan essence of European greatness. In bleeding the Romans to acculturate themselves, Barbarians have inadvertently created a world in which their own degeneracy is accepted as the status quo. For instance, the federates who sacked Rome were enablers of Attila the Hun. The Scythians enabled Genghis Khan. Barbarians style themselves as heirs to Rome and simultaneously claim that the true Rome is flawed. I share no such self-deception that has rotted Western Civilisation over the centuries. Of course, some of the worst offences are due instead to natural causation. The Black Death wrought much of our ills today, so it is not entirely proper to blame the responses by humans in regard to religion and economy.
|
|
|||
|
Well, thank you too. I am wondering why my profile image is missing. Was it offensive or something? What is allowed and disallowed here?
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
Stirpes - Rules and Info You have to write at least 10 posts and be a member for 24h here, before you can attach an avatar and profile pic.
__________________
Aptrgangr sagt: I am republican anyway ![]() Lutiferre sagt: me too, but thats mostly because i am against monarchy ![]() „Noch sitzt Ihr da oben, Ihr feigen Gestalten. Vom Feinde bezahlt, doch dem Volke zum Spott! Doch einst wird wieder Gerechtigkeit walten, dann richtet das Volk, dann gnade Euch Gott!“ (Theodor Körner 1791-1813)
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
Last edited by Brvtvs; Wednesday, August 22nd, 2007 at 11:06. Reason: clarification |
|
|||
|
It is better to have this type of reception, like it is to be in full communion with the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church. Are you Breton as well, or some other Gallic creature of God?
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
There are several Breton members on this board, and even a separatist. ![]() |
|
|||
|
I am romantic when it comes to our heritage, but not a gallophobic separatist. If not France, Brittany should join Britain (imho). Brittany could not survive alone. Brittany is an offshoot of Britain, as Scotland is of Ireland. Perhaps Scots and Irish could reunite while Bretons and Britons do? I include England (Lloegr in Cymraeg) because it was King Arthur's land and the major section of Britannia under Rome. I am not "Celticist". I firmly believe in our Trojan origins and important position as provincial Romans at one time. If Gaels think Celtic as a term applies to them in distinction from Rome, then so be it. I find it fluffy, since they believe their Egyptian roots make Celtic so different. I find it rather tiring to deal with "new age" Gaels, when they want to be seen as "purer" than those of Brythonic classification.
|
|
||||
|
Britain is an imperialistic concept that has nothing to do with the nations that make it up. It is a state rather than a nation.
__________________
suchen. geben. lieben. leben.
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
We don't need no thought control. No dark sarcasm in the classroom. Teachers leave those kids alone.' Britain was long ago an empire of its own, before the fall of Rome itself. Both native Tudor and Stuart dynasties realised this when claiming certain authorities resting upon the "Imperial Crown". I know full well the history of the British people, which has nothing to do with the monarchy since James II was deposed in the "Glorious Revolution". Britain is not a Germanic state. Briton is a type of Roman and I don't care how anachronistic it may seem to the lunatic fringe. Three British subnations exist: Logres, Alba, Cambria. At one time, Cornubia was distinct from Britain and sold its fine metallurgic talent to the Hellenes. To make it perfectly clear, you are preaching to the choir of a different church. Last edited by Brvtvs; Wednesday, August 22nd, 2007 at 13:24. Reason: replace link with text |
|
||||
|
Welcome.
Original and unusual view for a breton. It will be interesting to debate together when I have more time. Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Separatist movements - choose your favourite Separatist movements - choose your favourite |