General characteristics of Indo-European Religion

[Goswin_van_Eyck]

General characteristics of Indo-European Religion



A) Indo-european religion is polytheistic, consisting of a
multiplicity of rites proper to various social groups and
localities, and pagan, i.e. peasant, reflecting the diversity of the
people and not the unity of a state cult, nor of an established
church.

B) Being pluralistic and diversified, this religion is naturally
tolerant; far from indulging in proselitism, each group jealously
guards its own gods, rites and formulae. In this sense it may be
called esoteric and initiatory. It possesses myths and symbols, but
is devoid of dogma. C) It is a religion of works and not of faith,
lived out rather than thought about. The performnce of the
traditional rites and of one¹s state are essential to it.

D) Being a political religion by reason of its framework (that of
the various ethnic units) and in view of the greater part of its
pantheon, as we shall see, a religion of leaders and not of priests,
it is without fanaticism. The poet may be an inspired being seized
from time to time by the divine frenzy, but the celebrant is a grave
and worthy magistrate. "Superstition" and foreign (or archaic)
ecstatic cults are viewed with disapproval, and sorcery is repressed
with severity. However the private practice of magic is widely
attested, viz. The Old Indian Atharvaveda, the Hittite rituals, many
examples in the classical world, among the Celts and Germans.

E) Character and appellations of the Indo-European gods

The gods are thought of as personal beings. Their nature cannot be
described with greater precision, but it is more or less close to
human nature according to the people and the period concerned. In
this context their appellations, four types of which occur, are
interesting:

a) common nouns denoting phenomena (fire, dawn), celestial bodies
(sun, moon) or abstract concepts (contract, oath);

b) derived or compound common nouns with possessive value denoting
the "master" of the corresponding phenomenon, being or social fact
(Lat. Silva-nus "forest-master", Ved. Brhaspàti- "master of the brh-
" i.e. "power-master");

c) personal nouns, non-motivated (Ved. Indra-) or motivated, for the
most part agent-nouns (Av. Vrthra-ghna- "he who breaks down
resistance");

d) syntagmata expressing a kindred relationship ("daughter of the
Sun").

Groups (b), (c) and (d) apply explicitly and group (a) implicitly to
personal beings: although their original nature is not lost sight
of, and poets constantly play on the ambivalence, Mitra/Contract and
Agni/Fire are just as personal as Indra in the Veda. We are not,
then, dealing with a lack of precision or a nature ("force")
intermediate between the thing or action and the god *dyew- "day-
sky" has the title *pHter- "father" tacked on to it from the very
beginning. Very few names have been reconstructed in Indo-European;
all of them denote former gods of the universe.

F) The two poles of sacrality

Benveniste (1969 II: 179 ff.) has clarified the dual nature of the
Indo-Europeans' idea of sacrality as evidenced by their vocabulary:
that which is "charged with divine power" is "positively sacred"
(Av. spenta-, Germanic *hailaz, Lat. Sanctus, Gr. Hieròs); that
which "contact is forbidden for man" (Av. yaozdata-, Germanic
*wihaz, Lat. Sacer, Gr. Hàgios) is "negatively sacred". A
corresponding duality is found in the terms for religious
observance, expressed on the one hand by verbs denoting either "to
cause to grow, to strengthen" or one of the sacrifical operations,
and on the other by those denoting religious attitude: the fear of
offending a god, even involuntarly, but at the same time confidence
in and even familiarity with the gods, especially in the case of
some of them. In Vedic India the bonds of Varuna/Oath are held in
awe, but Indra is treated as a "comrade" (yùj-). Indo-European
religion contains strict prohibitions, but is a religion of freemen
(Neckel 1920: 134; Höfler 1971: 371 ff.)

The gods of the universe

Sky, earth, important heavenly bodies and atmospheric phenomena have
become divine, but the constant tendency is to link nature with
politics by means of cosmic symbolism.

1. The heavens and the earth

A) The Indo-European gods are called *deywòs "those of the day-sky"
(Haudry 1987 b: 28 f.), a term whose origins go back to a period in
which the Day-sky, *dyéw-pHtér-, was the first among the gods.
Hittite Sius "Sun god" is his most archaic reflex, which retains his
temporal character, the limitation of the day. He lost this primacy
in those cases where he remained the sky (so the Vedic Dyaùh),
whereas his name passed to the sovereign god in the case of the
Greeks (Zeùs) and the Romans (Jupiter). To the *deywos of day who
inhabit the heavens are opposed the demons whose habitat is the
Night-sky or Hell. This theology, initially linked with the
revolving-sky-cosmology, is perpetrated in the various dualism which
place gods and demons in opposition to one another, such as the
Mazdaism of the Iranians. The earth-mother is, in the last state of
this theology, the consort of the ³sky², but in more ancient times
she was the consort of a black Night-sky who was succeeded by the
white Day-sky after the brief reign of a red Dawn- or Dusk-sky.

B) The Veda and Baltic folklore preserve traces of a demoniac Dawn
from whose clutches the sun had to be snatched. But in a more recent
state of the myth, Dawn, "daughter of the Day-sky" (Schmitt 1967: §
333 ff.) is on the latter¹s side in his daily combat with darkness.
As Dumézil has shown (1974: 66 f.), this is the meaning of the
curious Roman ritual of the Mater Matuta, in which matrons pamper
their nephews and drive out a servant-girl, in the image of the good
Dawn who guides the first steps of her sister Night¹s son, the sun,
after driving out demonic Darkness. We shall see below that it is
here a question not of daily but of annual Dawn. Daily Dawn is at
the base of only a part of the mythology surrounding the various
Dawn-goddesses, especially those who bear another name, such as the
Greek Aphrodite and her corresponding heroin Helen. Many goddesses
and heroins of the insular Celts, bound to the fairy Other World,
such as Etain, Fand, Brigit, Boand, Mòrrigan, are to be interpreted
as reflexes of Indo-European Dawn. We retain the Irish tale of the
birth of the Sun (Angus Mac Oc), conceived by Diurnal Sky (Dagda)
and Dawn (Eithne or Boand) without the knowing of Elcmar (Ogme), who
in the story plays the part of the Indo-European Nocturnal Sky
(Jouet 1993).

C) The Divine Twins "Sons of the Day-Sky" (O.Ind. divò nàpata,
attribute of the Asvin, the Greek diòskouroi; the Baltic Sons of
*Deivas; O. Icel. dags synir "Sons of Day" Sd 3) must be, on account
of their designation, cosmic entities, like their sister Dawn (B).
But their identification is debated: Twilight (Myriantheus 1896) or
rather Morning and Evening Star (Mannhardt 1875). Their most
important parts are the courting of rescue of Dawn or Sun¹s
Daughter, whom they marry jointly, or whom they give away to Moon.

D) Two bodies of evidence in aggreement with one another show that
the Sun, together with the Day-sky, was the great god of Indo-
European religion in its oldest form. The traditional formulary
preserves no less than five expressions applied to him or to his
attributes (Schmitt 1967: § 314 ff.), and, alonside his ordinary
name *sHuel-, a parallel poetic form has been reconstructed from
Sanscr. Ravi-: Armenian arew. Again, the iconography of
archaeological sites which can with certainty be attributed to Indo-
European peoples abounds with solar emblems. Worship of the sun
lives on more in popular worship and subsequently in folklore than
in the "political religion" into which the sun, though in a modest
role, was incorporated. He belongs to the third function by reason
of his beneficient character (this is the meaning of svastika-, the
Indian name for the solar emblem), and on the other hand
as "universal watchman", "eye", he becomes more or less the
sovereign god¹s police chief.

E) The Moon (*meH1-n-s/ot (Beekees 1982)) is both the unfaithful
husband of the Sun goddess, whose punishment is the lunar cycle, and
a warrior-god who fights against the fiends of Night-sky.

2. The elements

A) Fire

As the terrestrial form of an element represented in the sky by the
sun and in the intervening space by lightning, fire is one of the
most ancient of Indo-European gods. In the historical period, it is
found in its original unified form only in the Aryan world: the
Vedic Agni is at one and the same time the element of fire and a
trifunctional god, a priest-god above all, but also a warrior-god
and a "young" god, possessing and bestowing vital force. These
various finctions are elsewhere shared out among separates "fire-
gods" or "fire-masters" whose names are not identical with that of
the element.

B) Water

Fire and water are linked in the curious image "fire, grandson of
the waters" (Schmitt 1967: § 577) viz. Gold (Haudry, to appear, c).
Water, or the waters, which themselves belong to three different
worlds, were deified, often in the form of a great goddess,
celestial source of the waters of earth, who in political religion
becomes a trifunctional entity like the Avestic Ardvi Sura
Anahita "she who is wet, heroic, immaculate" or a third-function
divinity.

C) Air

Winds in the historical period are minor genii. However, the former
importance of this element shows through in the name of the great
Aryan warrior-god Vayu "the wind": he derives this warrior-role from
the fact that the intermediate world through which he blows is the
arena in which the gods of the day-sky and the demons of the night-
sky confront one another.

D) We have seen how these ancient gods were incorporated into
political religion; on the other hand, they survived in popular
religion. For this reason it will not do reject, a priori, evidence
such as that provided by Caesar for the Germanic tribes who,
according to him, "consider as gods only those which they see, the
sun, Vulcan (fire) and the moon" (B.G. 6. 21).

E) These ancient gods are the only ones whose Indo-European names
can be reestablished with reasonable plausibility: apart from those
of Day-sky the Father, Dawn, the Sun and Fire (a) type appellation,
above, the names of a "fire-master" *wlkà-no- (Volcanus, Zeus
Welchanos, Ossetian Wærgon, and Smith Wayland, Schröder 1977);
a "grandson of the waters" *nepto/u-no- (Dumézil 1986c: 18 f.;
Puhvel 1987: 227 f.); a "hitter", lightning-god, derived from *per-
k/g- "to hit" and associated with the oak, and a "swell-master",
*pHus-H1en- (O.Ind. Pusàn, Gr. Pàn, Schulze 1909) have been
reconstructed.

3. Gods of the individual

These ancient deities are those who are closest to man, the most
reliable succour for the lonely. For an orphan-girl alone in the
world, runs a Lithuanian song, (Senn 1957: 40) "Sun is the mother
who piles up her dowry for her, Moon is the father who gives her
share in the inheritance, the star is a sister who weaves her crown
and the Pleiads a brother to take her for walks in the country". In
the same way, the Hattic-Hittite Sun god Istanu most particularly
has compassion on mankind, on the downtrodden and
defenceless: "Istanu, father and mother of the oppressed and lonely
person you (are) you restore the claims of the lonely and oppressed
person" (Cf. Istanu¹s epithet "Sheperd of the lands/of mankind")
(Justus 1983: 78).




From the book The Indo-Europeans, Lyon, Institut d'Etudes Indo-
Européennes, 1994.


Jean Haudry

[Goswin_van_Eyck]

Whether IER can be traced by comparing the structures, motives and elements of the diverse IE tribes and understood what is integral and what derivative and foreign, but adapted and incoroprated into the IE faith, is not the biggest concern, structures lavished with
mythological content provide a skeleton and a husk of a given
religion, the exotery is susceptible to many influences and altered
by wind of change, some aspects might be borrowed from other
cultural cycles; the essential(=esotery)often eludes us or is
recoved only fragmentated.

Furthermore there is always bias, we think according to a specific
mindset conditioned by the ruling paradigm and our own dialectic
relationship to this paradigm.

The mind and spirit which have created these religions is not really
perceiveable, we only have a hint what it might have been.

[Goswin_van_Eyck]

These traditions imo are deep-rooted in the Bronze Age(c.2400BC-
600BC)and reflect more than a shift in the social composition of
tribes and adoption of new values, ideas and ceremonies.
It's an intoxicating liveness of a renewed spirit overwriting the
world he lives and dies in, a hymne to some boisterous events that
would overturn the placidity and greater sense of mutualism(in
Kropotkin's sense) that lived among the Mesolithic fishing-gathering
and Neolithic cultures of Europe.
In a later installment, I would like to divulge on the issue in how
far this revolution was aberrant and actually a product and
intervention of foreign extraction.
Suffice to say that the Bronze Age injected a taste or need for
social ranking with chieftains(themselves elevated to semi-gods e.g.
in the Roman period)in so-called Fürstensitze, where exclusive
artisanal objects, yardsticks of power and status, were accumulated
and they were located to crossroads of trading lines.
The link is layed with the East Mediterrenean space and to
understand the disaster which would befallen Europe, it will later
be of importance to investigate this cultural zone.

Anyway, the Bronze Age is the great period wherein, to use Julius
Evola specific nomenclatura, the "razza degli eroi", the race of
heroes, emerges; it's believed that they will bring along a
restauration by gropping back to an order of things where the male
principle of the Sun isn't subjugated by the feminine principle
embodied by the Great Mother, however they're rule is one of derived
manhood and not the primordial state before the Fall of Mankind,
hence the necessity of a second birth, the initiation rite.
The eidos of the individual defines society and is defined by the
ethic of that period.
The adventurous, martial hero armoured by precious weaponry of half-
mysterious provenance and his use of innovations breaching
distances, conquering new lands to create a world where the Sun
never seems to go down, happen to be laid down in these IE traditions
(sun chariots, wheel and solar symbols, ritual axes, magical
swords...), a titanic extasy.
What we know of the IE religion is henceforth best seen as pur et
simple the Bronze Age version, if anything the most noteworthy and
influential till the present in our imagery and literature.