|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Forum Rules | VB Image Host | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Malta - 2006 - experiencing the joys of multiculturalism first hand, “strength in diversity” indeed A relatively peaceful and ethnically homogenous society is now discarding those values, due to illegal immigration and contrary to popular will. Ignore Malta's limited territory, being an archipelago barely visible on a map of the Mediterrenean, ignore the fact that according to EU statistics it is the most densely populated state in Europe, ignore the fact that with practically half the native population and a Malta all to be rebuilt while still under British colonial rule our political class invoked the demographic need to emigrate decades ago, ignore other socio-economic and ethno-cultural reasons, Malta needs immigration whether legal or illegal. We would be inhumane and unChristian if not, notwithstanding the fact that those who make such accusations are generally liberals and atheists with anti-clericalism as a a favourite hobby for those capable enough to notice. In respect of pro-immigration values, “traditional Christian values” are surfacing left, right and centre. Well, perhaps not “right” this time. People forget that it was Maltese nationalists, true and proper, and not our modern day “nationalists” of Christian Democrat (and some even liberal leftist) persuasions, that defended our Catholic faith, and inscribed it as the religion of Malta in our constitution against those socialist progressivists who pushed for a secular state and human rights while violating the latter repeatedly in what was a quasi-regime in the pejorative sense. The same Church fought closer to nationalists for our national rights and invoked l'amor di patria repeatedly in the past. I can assure you that the tone of the nationalists in those days was much more virulent than I ever used in my life, but would those invoking “traditional Christian values” know that if they barely know these facts of a few decades back? So much for being traditional, they're not even historical! The liberal knights of righteousness, freedom and democracy, insist on the beauty and strength of diversity and how illegal immigrants will enrich our culture. Some might even go as far as proclaiming that illegal immigrants have a much richer cultural baggage than us Maltese. Of course? Malta? Insignificant. The islands which were crucial for the defeat of the Axis in WWII in the Mediterrenean. In the war, we fought for our liberty, and let us skip the fact that Malta was still a colony whose natives controlled little of their future in those days and in pre-war and post-war years while renowned nationalists were illegally deported in the same war with the infringement of their own human rights. Notwithstanding the fact that two wrongs don't make a right, imperialist colonialisers have been blamed for this mass immigration and Third World misery. In Malta no one apparently remembers that Malta was a victim of imperialism and colonialism, and our history involved no less oppression than most other colonies. Even our own parents remember this, and probably the same liberals themselves who speak of the horrors of imperialism and colonalism, not for the Maltese though, but for poor Africans exclusively. The islands host the oldest erect stone structures in the whole world, were renowned in antiquity for their riches by quite a few Latin historians, considered soci by the Romans, supposedly Christianized by the Apostle Saint Paul as testified in the Holy Scriptures, wrecked by Arabs after nearly a 1000 years of Romano-Byzantinian rule, while the same Arabs practically left no substantial heritage in Malta, liberated by the Norman rulers of Sicily, and after passing under the sovereignty of Anjou, the Swabians, the Castillian & Aragonese, they became home of the famous Knights of Malta. The latter being European noblemen, whose permanence in the island earned it the epithet of Fior del Mondo (flower of the world), and the islands whose people alone withstood successfully an 18,000 strong siege in the 15th century by the Saracens, to subsequently withstand an even worse one against around 45,000 Turks and Arabic allies in 1565, are now facing the greatest siege ever. Much more dangerous, the new siege comes under the guise of charity, tolerance, and multicultural richness, the Maltese are victims of a liberal campaign in order to make the Maltese accept that the Maltese have no identity, and we must accept fellow human beings wherever they came from, in whatever number, and in whatever circumstances. The road to hell is paved with good intentions. Notwithstanding the plenty of rational arguments, be them legal, social, economical, ethnical, cultural, religious, et cetera, and ignoring the grossly anti-immigration popular will, it seems that the threat to Malta is represented by “fascists” and other boogeyman style epithets attributed to sinister people, such as myself, a 24-year old student who always treated everyone the best he could (even to the extent of helping illegal immigrants themselves when it wasn't objectionable!) We will not speak of such arguments here. We would only like to inform Stirpes' members and our readers, that recently Malta has been a victim of a group of terrorist attacks, against people known to be pro-immigration. Notwithstanding the fact that myself, and other anti-immigrationists have condemned the actions, myself in particular with no room for doubt about the condemnation, we are still the culprits in what truly is a political persecution, aimed at silencing any dissenting anti-immigrationist voice in Malta. It is not as if we were a minority, not at all. Popular will is incredibly anti-immigrationist to the extent of expressions that disgust myself occasionally. We have a minority of anti-national liberals, masquerading themselves under the guise of human rights, who want to silence a vast majority of Maltese people. The irony is that with all the fuss on human rights, there has not yet been a single case of judicially asserted human rights infringement in Malta in relation to clandestines. Actually, when inquiring on a riot in which our army supposedly used excessive force to quell it, a prominent retired judge asserted much that goes against what these liberals contend, and runs in favour of anti-immigrationists who in most cases only ask for truth and justice plus respect for our national rights, the liberals in question lambasted the report by prominent judge de Pasquale. We in Malta, when year after year, after incurring as much illegal immigrants as half our birthrate (which being an official figure might include effectively non-Maltese people) as stated by our Deputy Prime Minister On. Dott. Tonio Borg, have to keep silent because a minority of very not so impartial journalists with liberal and leftist agendas have decided that we “fascists” should be ashamed. Ashamed of what? Ashamed because there are some lunatics committing arsons which we (or at least myself) openly condemned without reservations? Because we expect our human right to freedom of expression? That you assert is attacked and which you want denied to people against immigration? If ever there was a group of people deserving the adjective of hypocrites, then we can say: BINGO! Notwithstanding the fact, that I wish the culprits of the arsons in question brought to justice and dealt with effectively, in order to safeguard social peace and the rule of law, give justice to the direct victims, and stop the political instrumentalisation in favour and against certain political agendas, the investigating police have as of yet charged no one. Rather, the police, also lambasted by our liberals, have brought in for questioning many alleged “extreme rightists” including those that support or supported the virulent and verbally violent sounding Norman Lowell. None of them were charged in relation to the offences, and recently Police Commissioner Rizzo has asserted that it would be a mistake to consider these arson attacks as attributable to a single cause, whather he intended by that. Yet some are sure, it is the “fascists”, and the sanction should not merely be that related to arson, but the cancellation of their human right of freedom of expression which is something that legally is totally unrelated. As a cherry on the cake, I'll inform all of you, that someone has been recognised and will be charged for an arson this week. He, or they as it seems there are accomplices, was caught red-handed. It is an illegal immigrant housed in an open centre, who gave fire to a soldier's vehicle. Meanwhile, a gang of 5 illegal immigrants, 3 of whom granted refugee status and the other 2 housed in an open centre, have yesterday night raped two Swedish tourists aged 18 and 21 years old. This happened in the local entertainment haven (a misnomer) named Paceville (another misnomer as there is no peace there, in every sense apparently). Perusing the national political sites, righteously, a local Green, whose party has been active 18 years or so and has never gained political representation, correctly asserted that the latest spate of arson attacks will damage Malta's democratic international standing and affect negatively our tourism industry. I agree, and I'm sure he is convinced that the criminal violations I mentioned, whose culprits have been secured, will incur the same negative effect for Malta, if not worse. This is particularly so considering that Scandinavia is a primary source of tourist-income generation for Malta, in particular in relation to young people seeking to pass summertime in Malta for leisure and English language studying. This is all from Malta, where unlike what the PSE member the Malta Labour Party said, we were not flooded by Sicilians through EU accession, but by further Arabs and sub-saharan Africans. In 2002 or so I was taken for a fool and a madman when I said that I would vote NO for EU accession also because illegal immigration would become very problematic. The same EU, so beloved by our transparty liberal faction and the local Christian Democrats clinging on the traditional nationalist and Catholic heritage of the Partito Nazionalista, has proven ineffectual for Malta's needs in this problematic international phenomenon and which has refused the derogation of the Dublin Treaty in respect of Malta's dire migratory situation in the middle of the Mediterranean. Now I ask everyone, who was right and who still is? Ederico Figallo http://patriae-caritas.blogspot.com (blog in Italian)
__________________
Last edited by Ederico; Monday, May 15th, 2006 at 22:37. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| None |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Newsflash: "Diversity" makes for less stable communities | Routasydän | Politics | 2 | Saturday, June 3rd, 2006 16:50 |
| Not enough "diversity" on TV : Meet Harry, Summer French TV sensation | Carnyx | Labour & Economic Issues | 0 | Tuesday, March 28th, 2006 10:26 |
| Malta: "Euro" or "Ewro"? - A letter of mine to the press + Baptism of Christ for Euro | Ederico | Politics | 0 | Tuesday, January 31st, 2006 22:24 |
| On "Race" and "Diversity" | Nadvojvoda Janez Kranjski | Studies | 2 | Tuesday, June 7th, 2005 22:54 |
| Malta - Questione della Lingua - Articoli Nazionalisti dal "Malta" | Ederico | Italo-Dalmatian | 1 | Thursday, March 10th, 2005 13:28 |