Weak Europeans

[Agrippa]

Inspired by a thread on TNP about Islamists and how they want to treat women and the reaction of European feminists.

The European white male lost control and became a weakling - not necessarily in every respect, but if its about fundamental values. "Our culture" is lost in the ideology of Individualism. Individualism is natural and was more developed in Europe for a long time, but thats not the same as the Individualism-ideology. Moral must be determined by the communities, collective needs on the long run in the first place. Things which are negative for the majority of the individuals, the collective-nation-race, the species and ecosystem are inacceptable no matter what legitimation some people might have for it.
As long as Europeans dont understand that and argue just on an individualistic level about this right and that, this personal issue and that, they will never understand, they will never recover, and they will finally perish.
Many feminists think they can do what they want, in fact the European male was corrupted by consumption and free sexuality, thats the point, that was "the deal". Most patriarchal societies have stricter moral and no free sexuality, this alone change so many things for the group, that we can't underestimate it. Some feminists argue against prostitution, porn, females as sexual objects and partly superficial sexual relationships, but fact is, without that, males wouldnt have accepted the "change" like they did.
On the other hand females are now a free good on the market, they are very often (childless) career oriented individuals, less organised and rebellious, cheaper and better to exploit, so we get even more unemployment, lower wages and less children - not to speak about the results of immigration.
This society is so sick, corrupted, manipulated and greedy that it is absurd. F.e. in Austria women which get earlier away from their children and to work again should get more child benefits than those which stay longer at home. The current system is BOTH (typical!) for the industrialists, entrepeneurs and leftist counterproductive because it lowers the female working rate! Though we have not enough children and too much unemployed! But ideology (ultra-egalitarian) and profits (cheaper workers, more competition, lower wages) prevent politicians from doing the right thing!
Males are still corrupted by surrogats and consumption (including free sexual relationships which are partly nothing else), weakened because of their ill upraising and adaptation to what they think society and females want (guess for what reason quite often again...) and females are in the (pseudo-) emancipation trap and corrupted by lifestyle and "life concepts", consumption, career orientation, emotional and ideological manipulation as well.
Another problem is that we dont only have manipulated weaker males and a feminised society, we have not enough young people as well. You can see in almost all times, in all elections that the revolutionary potential is mainly those of young males - they are more ready to sacrifice, both themselves and others to "change something" to put it simple.
We might hate whats happening in France, but thats just a first look at it, they have young males there, not fully integrated in the feminised society, nor in the surrogat system of consumption, career orientation (job is your life) and free sexual relationships. They have still a basic, though in France degenerated social system (mostly Islam based) and can act in their small neighbourhoods of often related people easier in groups.
The Individualism of the West was only then more efficient, if the state was strong and the leadership good, lead the otherwise individualised people (free from traditions and family mostly) in the right, for the group advantageous, direction. That was finally broken, as the rest of natural family structures in the West. The starters of this were leftist, but the final profiteurs will be the plutocrats like we can see already. Because invidiuals without any group orientation are easier to exploit, easier to manipulate, dont organise themselves as efficient and fast, are simply helpless against bigger structures, f.e. of multinational companies. Heterogenous societies are less social oriented and have all mentioned weakness even more than just indidualised ones.
But leftists and feminists dont care for that, they think their "individual logic" is more important and that, if the worst happens, basic democracy and enlightenment will be enough - but thats absurd, it never worked in bigger and more complex structures and it never will. Average humans can only in strictly organised group oriented unities act for the collective and finally against bigger structures. And this ability will be part for part destroyed in the West, in that areas in which it isnt done already...
Even more corrupted, manipulated, individualised and older Europeans...without a turn, no survival. We should care more about ourselves, the foreigners just exploited European stupidity and weakness. We only stand a chance if we change ourselves. Birthrates are lowest ever, mixed couples everywhere, norm and group orientation FOR the natural grown unity (not against it, thats there) is dead, females are free goods both on the job market and for males, domestic and foreign ones, families dont work any more, most people have just individualistic life concepts.
As long as that doesnt change, even if there would be no immigration any more and many would repatriated, the problem would still be the same, it would just need more time until the population would degenerate, getting exploit and finally substituted. We must target our own weaknesses first, if we can't get rid of them, we can't cope with the immigration problem in the right way as well...