The New Blasphemy

[Eriugena]

The New Blasphemy

by Tom Blair
News Editor, The Jubilee

There was a time when a man did not blaspheme God in America. There were severe social proscriptions against it. Some communities even had laws against blasphemy. Well blasphemy is still a great sin in America and may soon be a crime again. But sadly America has a new god and so, a new blasphemy.
Let me here commit the new blasphemy while it is still legal. What we know as the "holocaust" is largely war-time propaganda. Propaganda that, unlike most war-time propaganda, was not quietly forgotten. Instead it has continued; grown more fantastic, more hateful, and more dangerous to question every year since 1945.

The truth is that somewhere between 700,000 and 1,500,000 people died in German work camps in 1944 and 1945. Most of them were Jews. Many were not. Most of them died in the last six months of the war from disease and hunger caused by America’s bombing of Germany and subsequent destruction of her infrastructure. There were some atrocities but very few. Few people realize that the International Red Cross had a field office in Auschwiz from 1942 until the end of the war. That office never reported or recorded any atrocities (Several years ago international Jewry forced the Red Cross to apologize to the Jews - apologize for not seeing something that never happened.)

Winston Churchill wrote a five volume history of World War II and never mentioned the holocaust. He never mentioned it because he knew that the holocaust was just wartime propaganda and he did not want to sully what he hoped would be the definitive history of the war with propaganda that common sense alone could refute. I could go on but the evidence I speak of is available to The Jubilee readers from many patriotic sources even though it is still widely censored by America’s media and libraries.

I once considered the battle over the holocaust as a great political trump card allowing us to take back the moral high ground on the censorship issue from the left. But I see now that it is much more important than that. The holocaust is qualitatively different than the silly lies nations tell their citizens to get them so fired up they will send their children to die in foreign wars. The holocaust is not pre-war propaganda. It is post-war propaganda.

Why do we need post World War II propaganda? Because World War II was the greatest human catastrophe in two thousand years for the Aryan peoples and we "gentiles" must not be allowed to see the truth. It was more than the slaughter of our racial kinsmen and the destruction of our racial homeland. World War II was the most significant crossroads the Christian nations have faced since Herman faced the legions of Rome in the forests of Teutonberg 2,000 years ago. But Herman won the battle of Teutonberg Wald. The Christian world lost World War II. We lost because we came to a crossroads and went the wrong way.

Our government needs post-war propaganda like the holocaust because the titanic ideological struggle of that war is still being fought. We all know how the Jews use their holocaust to extort money, extort privilege, extort political advantage, and extort moral superiority from the Christian nations. But our anti-Christ government needs World War II to continue to exploit and destroy the Christian nations of Europe. If the Aryan peoples are allowed to think that they have the right to sovereignty within the homelands that God gave them, then the whole globalist con-game comes to an end.

Non-white, non-Christian peoples have swarmed into Europe and America since World War II. They have changed our culture, language, churches, and communities. The same thing is happening in Europe. Our legal system has changed from one based on English common law into an incomprehensible Talmudic monstrosity - with thought crimes ("hate" crimes), guilt by association (conspiracy), criminalization of legitimate protest (federal and civil suits against peaceful abortion clinic protests), federal subpoenas used to threaten anti-immigration groups, and sedition trials against opponents of federal tyranny. We are so weak that we no longer defend ourselves. And we are weak because our spiritual fabric has been subverted by Judeo-Christian guilt; much of it instilled with lies surrounding the holocaust. The last great effort of a Christian nation to defend its sovereignty as a homeland for its people (World War II) is portrayed as the greatest crime in history. Our people, like sheep, believe this lie.

Even the paleo-conservative Jewish political scientist Paul Gottfried (one of the few Jewish writers I truly enjoy reading) agrees with most of the points made by the Institute for Historical Review. (IHR, PO Box 4296, Torrance, CA 90510). In a fine letter to the IHR Journal he laments the "self-loathing combined with self-indulgence which characterizes our culture." But Prof. Gottfried is Jewish, and so not surprisingly goes on to say that we should fight the guilt complex confronting us but somehow not challenge the holocaust mythology. I feel the good professors pain. And I understand. But Prof. Gottfried has to understand that there ARE two sides to this story. I don’t really care how religious groups like Jews portray themselves. I expect their myths to glorify their deeds, magnify their oppression, and elevate their role in history. But if lies are told about the events of World War II, then that is as much a desecration of the memory of my people as the holocaust is to the Jews. I don’t care about their religious dogma until they start to shove it down the throats of my children; or take my tax dollars to build their icons on Americas public property; or use it to set American foreign policy against the interests of the American people; or slander the people of my nation.

The battle over the holocaust is a battle for the allegiance of our children. It is a battle for our right to be a nation. It is a battle for sovereignty over our homelands. Do I "deny the holocaust?" No! No indeed. I hope the holocaust is not denied and never forgotten. I hope the holocaust is remembered as the greatest propaganda effort and hate campaign ever waged against a civilized people. We must never forget. We must look at the despoliation of our people and our culture and ask - Why do the heavens not darken? We have lost the will and courage to defend ourselves. The time has come to commit the new blasphemy. It is time to deny the gods of the New World Order and to honor those of us who will burn at the stake for doing so.
http://www.stormfront.org/censorship/newblas.htm

[Eriugena]

Think on these things - The Auschwitz Taboo

Compiled from Dr. Toben Dec. 2004

Prof Dr Robert Hepp[1]

"Occasional experiments that I have conducted in my seminars convince me that 'Auschwitz' [the most well known site of the Holocaust] is ethnologically speaking one of the few taboo topics that our 'taboo free society' still preserves.[2] While they did not react at all to other stimulants, 'enlightened' central European students who refused to accept any taboos at all, would react to a confrontation with 'revisionist' [denial] texts' about the gas chambers at Auschwitz in just an 'elementary' way (including the comparable physiological symptoms) as members of primitive Polynesian tribes would react to an infringement of one of their taboos. The students were literally besides themselves and were neither prepared nor capable of soberly discussing the presented theses. For the sociologist this is a very important point because a society's taboos reveal what it holds sacred.

Taboos also reveal what the community fears.[3] Currently fear of perceived danger takes on the form of ticks and phobias that remind us of obsessive neurotics. However, it cannot be denied that numerous taboos have a function that preserves individuals from danger, and even if taboos are a part of an individual's make-up, it is difficult to ascertain if the fear of the one rests on the power of the other, or vice versa.

It is thus understandable that priests and rulers have never hesitated to use taboos to secure their power; to date there has been no society which has relinquished the use of taboos to secure its own power base. In a 'modern society', such as the Federal Republic [of Germany], the formal rules of behaviour and sanctions play a larger role than it does within the Polynesian tribes to which European explorers first drew our attention.

In our society, besides the usual 'legal' commands and prohibitions that control behaviour, there are also commands and prohibitions that are self-regulating. If such expectations are frustrated then, as in the Polynesian society, an automatic sanctions process is activated that does not need to be justified.

A 'modern' society does not in any way react differently to breeches of taboos than does a 'primitive' society. Taboos are generally perceived as 'outrageous' and 'abominations' and produce spontaneous 'revulsion'.

In the end the perpetrator is isolated, excluded from society and himself 'tabooed'."

[1] Robert Hepp: "Die Kampagne gegen Hellmut Diwald von 1978/79 - Zweiter Teil: "Richtigstellungen", in: Rolf-Josepf Eibicht (Hg.), Hellmut Diwald. Sein Vermächtnis für Deutschland. Sein Mut zur Geschichte, Hohenrain-Verlag, Tübingen 1994, p.140 (http://www.vho.org/D/diwald/hepp.html.)

[2] Cf. Franz Steiner, Taboo, Cohen & West, London 1956, p.20ff.

[3] Hutton-Webster, Taboo. A Sociological Study, Stanford University Press, Stanford 1942. Reprinted London 1973, p.14: "Fear is systematized in taboo."
-----------------------------------------------------
http://revforum.yourforum.org/viewtopic.php?t=1580

[Ederico]

I believe, that while Historical Enquiry plus Revisionism should be encouraged and countered with counter-thesis (in the style of thesis versus anti-thesis, but in this case a synthesis might not materialise), unlike the repressive methods of modern "Democracies" which are a mask for the Dictatorship of the Politically Correct, certain forms of Revisionism might actually not be positive for European Nationalism.

My point is, the Holocaust is gone and I believe that as European Nationalists we should view it with indifference rather than be victims of the barrage of "facts" that are dished out to a very docile and uninquisitive public. Indifference to ideas kills their strength.

[Eriugena]

Originally Posted by Ederico Figallo

I believe, that while Historical Enquiry plus Revisionism should be encouraged and countered with counter-thesis (in the style of thesis versus anti-thesis, but in this case a synthesis might not materialise), unlike the repressive methods of modern "Democracies" which are a mask for the Dictatorship of the Politically Correct, certain forms of Revisionism might actually not be positive for European Nationalism.

My point is, the Holocaust is gone and I believe that as European Nationalists we should view it with indifference rather than be victims of the barrage of "facts" that are dished out to a very docile and uninquisitive public. Indifference to ideas kills their strength.

I understand and accept your points to a certain extent. Unfortunately the Holocaust lie is not so much an idea as a powerful psycho-religious weapon wielded not only by the Jews but by all those who are hell-bent on creating a one-world, one-mongrel race of worker-consumers, where all nations will be dissolved (excepting the Jewish nation of course!). The H is a quite brilliant tool for discrediting all resistance to globalisation-NWO. We do not have the option of ignoring it, we have to destroy it by dragging it into the cold light of day.