|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Forum Rules | VB Image Host | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Historical Revisionism Official History is written by the winners. Is it true History? Expose the falsities behind "officialist" Historiography and denounce them here. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
First, I dont mean the holocaust. I mean European civilian deaths directly caused by the Axis, and no one else.
Anyone have some knowledge about the official figures, and perhaps their accuracy? If no official figure exists, for this specific kind of casualty (i.e. Europeans killed by the Axis), could someone try to make an estimate or research it? I am not posting this in revisionism as a statement; I am not proposing that we should make it a goal to revise the figures of WW2 casualties, unless there is reason to that is. I simply want to know if there is reason to, and I am posting it in this section because this question may or may not require some research. Quote:
|
|
|||
|
I suppose, but due to the political factors of Russians in specific, two figures (one inclusive, and one exclusive) would be best.
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
350,000 civilians (of course not all of them were killed by the sole Axis) 250,000 military casualties 600,000 1.5 % Why would Russians not be included?
__________________
"Their trumpets again are of a peculiar barbarian kind; they blow into them and produce a harsh sound which suits the tumult of war."
Last edited by Carnyx; Friday, January 4th, 2008 at 17:55. Reason: dot |
|
|||
|
Quote:
And supposedly because I could figure out that many Russians would have died at the hands of the axis, so a figure with and without is best. But it's not just civilians I need - its exclusively European civilians killed by the Axis, the full numbers. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
That is to say 1.5% (not 1,5% -my mistake) of total French population died.
__________________
"Their trumpets again are of a peculiar barbarian kind; they blow into them and produce a harsh sound which suits the tumult of war."
|
|
||||
|
Oh and by the way, the allied bombardments killed more French civilians than the Axis.
Quote:
__________________
"Their trumpets again are of a peculiar barbarian kind; they blow into them and produce a harsh sound which suits the tumult of war."
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
How many European civilians did the Allies kill? |
|
||||
|
Not particularity but there were many divisions from all over the SU that fought on the eastern front. Of course the large majority of the casualties sustained were by Europeans.
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
What is rather commonly represented is that the strategy of the Red Army - or say a lack of strategy, lacking maintenance of field gear and an abundance of troops - made for an abundance of casualties. I'm not saying that all of this is correct, I'm just interested in discussing it.
__________________
Den västerländska traditionen kan man vara trogen bara genom att ifrågasätta den med förnuftet som måttstock. Svante Nordin, Det pessimistiska förnuftet Wir haben eine ältere Offenbarung als jede geschriebene, die Natur. Friedrich Schelling, Über das Wesen der menschlichen Freiheit The French were always there when they needed us. American proverb |
|
||||
|
Hard to say. Couldn't find many infos but just to give you an idea, the French campaign (Axis') would have caused the death of 20,000 civilians (out of a total of ~ 300,000).
__________________
"Their trumpets again are of a peculiar barbarian kind; they blow into them and produce a harsh sound which suits the tumult of war."
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
Only joking........here you go.Axis History Forum :: Index BTW....what is that painting in your avatar...?????? |