|
|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Forum Rules | VB Image Host | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Geopolitics Analyses, articles and opinions on world politics and strategies |
| View Poll Results: Should imperialism and past empires be objected without questions? | |||
| Yes. Every past empire is a product only of imperialistic aggressiveness. |
   
|
2 | 28.57% |
| There are questionable limits to such objectioning. The origins of some empires may have been aggressive, while other merely defensive |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| There are questionable limits to such objectioning (like option #2). Besides, the policies and the effects of the different empires should be judged on individual cases |
  
|
2 | 28.57% |
| No. Empires are inherent to Civilisation and Human Evolution. They cannot be put to question on the grounds of a simplicist and politically correct and biased objectionism |
  
|
2 | 28.57% |
| I would go for one of the options above with some modifications (name option and reason the modifications) |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| None of the above or I'm unsure (please, discuss) |
  
|
1 | 14.29% |
| Voters: 7. | |||
