The Rape of Europe

[Aptrgangr]

The Rape of Europe

The German author Henryk M. Broder recently told the Dutch newspaper De Volkskrant (12 October) that young Europeans who love freedom, better emigrate. Europe as we know it will no longer exist 20 years from now. Whilst sitting on a terrace in Berlin, Broder pointed to the other customers and the passers-by and said melancholically: “We are watching the world of yesterday.”
Europe is turning Muslim. As Broder is sixty years old he is not going to emigrate himself. “I am too old,” he said. However, he urged young people to get out and “move to Australia or New Zealand. That is the only option they have if they want to avoid the plagues that will turn the old continent uninhabitable.”
Many Germans and Dutch, apparently, did not wait for Broder’s advice. The number of emigrants leaving the Netherlands and Germany has already surpassed the number of immigrants moving in. One does not have to be prophetic to predict, like Henryk Broder, that Europe is becoming Islamic. Just consider the demographics. The number of Muslims in contemporary Europe is estimated to be 50 million. It is expected to double in twenty years. By 2025, one third of all European children will be born to Muslim families. Today Mohammed is already the most popular name for new-born boys in Brussels, Amsterdam, Rotterdam, and other major European cities.
Broder is convinced that the Europeans are not willing to oppose islamization. “The dominant ethos,” he told De Volkskrant, “is perfectly voiced by the stupid blonde woman author with whom I recently debated. She said that it is sometimes better to let yourself be raped than to risk serious injuries while resisting. She said it is sometimes better to avoid fighting than run the risk of death.”
In a recent op-ed piece in the Brussels newspaper De Standaard (23 October) the Dutch (gay and self-declared “humanist”) author Oscar Van den Boogaard refers to Broder’s interview. Van den Boogaard says that to him coping with the islamization of Europe is like “a process of mourning.” He is overwhelmed by a “feeling of sadness.” “I am not a warrior,” he says, “but who is? I have never learned to fight for my freedom. I was only good at enjoying it.”
As Tom Bethell wrote in this month’s American Spectator: “Just at the most basic level of demography the secular-humanist option is not working.” But there is more to it than the fact that non-religious people tend not to have as many children as religious people, because many of them prefer to “enjoy” freedom rather than renounce it for the sake of children. Secularists, it seems to me, are also less keen on fighting. Since they do not believe in an afterlife, this life is the only thing they have to lose. Hence they will rather accept submission than fight. Like the German feminist Broder referred to, they prefer to be raped than to resist.
“If faith collapses, civilization goes with it,” says Bethell. That is the real cause of the closing of civilization in Europe. Islamization is simply the consequence. The very word Islam means “submission” and the secularists have submitted already. Many Europeans have already become Muslims, though they do not realize it or do not want to admit it.
Some of the people I meet in the U.S. are particularly worried about the rise of anti-Semitism in Europe. They are correct when they fear that anti-Semitism is also on the rise among non-immigrant Europeans. The latter hate people with a fighting spirit. Contemporary anti-Semitism in Europe (at least when coming from native Europeans) is related to anti-Americanism. People who are not prepared to resist and are eager to submit, hate others who do not want to submit and are prepared to fight. They hate them because they are afraid that the latter will endanger their lives as well. In their view everyone must submit.
This is why they have come to hate Israel and America so much, and the small band of European “islamophobes” who dare to talk about what they see happening around them. West Europeans have to choose between submission (islam) or death. I fear, like Broder, that they have chosen submission – just like in former days when they preferred to be red rather than dead.

http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/1609

[Menydh]

Originally Posted by Aptrganga

The German author Henryk M. Broder recently told the Dutch newspaper De Volkskrant (12 October) that young Europeans who love freedom, better emigrate. Europe as we know it will no longer exist 20 years from now.

Emigrate to where?

There are two problems with this. One is that to avoid the problem he is telling people to become the problem themselves anywhere else. The other is, simply, where to.

Looking at the source where the article comes from, The Brussels Journal, I think that I have an idea of where they would suggest people to move.

Whilst sitting on a terrace in Berlin, Broder pointed to the other customers and the passers-by and said melancholically: “We are watching the world of yesterday.”

Incidentally, what this Broder identifies as yesterday I am very much afraid that it is the Liberalism which brought about what is today and --if it's not stopped-- what will be tomorrow.

Europe is turning Muslim.

And here comes the identification of the problem. Islam.

I have to ask here, do you think that if there were no Islamic immigrants this Broder, the Brussels Journal, and all those Liberals, Libertarians and other assorted bleeding whiners would raise their fears?

As Broder is sixty years old he is not going to emigrate himself. “I am too old,” he said. However, he urged young people to get out and “move to Australia or New Zealand. That is the only option they have if they want to avoid the plagues that will turn the old continent uninhabitable.”

He should say Australia and New Zealand louder. The Germans, the Dutch and the English are only getting clear the first part of the message (emigrate).

The way things are here, I am afraid that one day I'm going to find one of them building his house under one of my orange trees.

Many Germans and Dutch, apparently, did not wait for Broder’s advice. The number of emigrants leaving the Netherlands and Germany has already surpassed the number of immigrants moving in.

The number of British emigrés is even higher. Much higher.

One does not have to be prophetic to predict, like Henryk Broder, that Europe is becoming Islamic.

At this point I have to wonder what would have been if their countries had been invaded by Islam 1,300 years ago?

As it appears, many delusional myths are starting to crumble into pieces these days.

Just consider the demographics. The number of Muslims in contemporary Europe is estimated to be 50 million. It is expected to double in twenty years. By 2025, one third of all European children will be born to Muslim families.

Big surprise. Wasn't it a president of Turkey who said that with the womb of their women they would conquer Europe?

But I suppose that at the time when he said that, Menier Belien (the owner of The Brussels Journal) and the rest of bleeding liberal/libertarians still found the ideas of cosmopolitanism and universalism attractive. And probably they still would, if it wasn't for Islam.

Do you really hope that you will get anywhere with the people who started all this misery?

Today Mohammed is already the most popular name for new-born boys in Brussels, Amsterdam, Rotterdam, and other major European cities.

It used to be Abraham, right?

Broder is convinced that the Europeans are not willing to oppose islamization. “The dominant ethos,” he told De Volkskrant, “is perfectly voiced by the stupid blonde woman author with whom I recently debated. She said that it is sometimes better to let yourself be raped than to risk serious injuries while resisting. She said it is sometimes better to avoid fighting than run the risk of death.”

A slap for the idiots who are still playing the idiot. As if an idiot could do something different..

I read in the German forum Skadi someone claiming that we are more likely to mix. Reality is proving the opposite.

But.. oh well! those idiots have much time to play and see no real problems in real life.

In a recent op-ed piece in the Brussels newspaper De Standaard (23 October) the Dutch (gay and self-declared “humanist”)

They say that people who are gay, are into drugs and other similar individuals are likely to become Libertarians. It makes sense.

author Oscar Van den Boogaard refers to Broder’s interview. Van den Boogaard says that to him coping with the islamization of Europe is like “a process of mourning.” He is overwhelmed by a “feeling of sadness.” “I am not a warrior,” he says, “but who is? I have never learned to fight for my freedom. I was only good at enjoying it.”

Here you have another example. The only thing he cares for is to assure that his depraved sodomite life style is not ruined by Islam.

I'm sorry if I am being overtly cinical here but, how can I feel pity for these people? I can't.

What do they care for what I care? The traditional view of the world that I have, the spirituality of my nation and even the nation herself is being destroyed by the work of people like them.

And now, am I supposed to care if a queer will no longer be allowed to pervert young children or if a liberal can no longer construct a cosmopolitan society?

As Tom Bethell wrote in this month’s American Spectator: “Just at the most basic level of demography the secular-humanist option is not working.” But there is more to it than the fact that non-religious people tend not to have as many children as religious people, because many of them prefer to “enjoy” freedom rather than renounce it for the sake of children. Secularists, it seems to me, are also less keen on fighting. Since they do not believe in an afterlife, this life is the only thing they have to lose. Hence they will rather accept submission than fight. Like the German feminist Broder referred to, they prefer to be raped than to resist.

Hello to all Christian bashers: You are RETARDED!

“If faith collapses, civilization goes with it,” says Bethell. That is the real cause of the closing of civilization in Europe. Islamization is simply the consequence. The very word Islam means “submission” and the secularists have submitted already. Many Europeans have already become Muslims, though they do not realize it or do not want to admit it.

Nah! There are lots of totem and fetish worshippers out there to make up for the destruction of Christendom (towards which they have put their tiny grain of help, yet insignificant). They must be millions waiting in the docks of the main cities of America to come to Europe.

Some of the people I meet in the U.S. are particularly worried about the rise of anti-Semitism in Europe. They are correct when they fear that anti-Semitism is also on the rise among non-immigrant Europeans. The latter hate people with a fighting spirit. Contemporary anti-Semitism in Europe (at least when coming from native Europeans) is related to anti-Americanism. People who are not prepared to resist and are eager to submit, hate others who do not want to submit and are prepared to fight. They hate them because they are afraid that the latter will endanger their lives as well. In their view everyone must submit.

Hilarious! Did I say that these guys are an asset?

After the apparent act of contriction, at last they come to what worries them about Islam: to save Europe's Jewry.

This is why they have come to hate Israel and America so much, and the small band of European “islamophobes” who dare to talk about what they see happening around them. West Europeans have to choose between submission (islam) or death. I fear, like Broder, that they have chosen submission – just like in former days when they preferred to be red rather than dead.

It is not my problem if there are idiots who would side with Islam only to go against Israel and America. Those are usually the nazis. I am not.

I know your concerns and see why you posted this particular article. I don't say that you are wrong. But you are not right either. The enemy of my enemy is not always my friend.