|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Forum Rules | VB Image Host | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Ethnopolitics Articles and texts on politics derived from ethnic conflicts and policies |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Or maybe we shouldn't squeeze these people in and they should just stay home.
![]()
__________________
suchen. geben. lieben. leben.
|
|
||||
|
Maybe one day the insanity will stop. But it will be difficult and painful to get to that point.
__________________
suchen. geben. lieben. leben.
|
|
||||
|
Below the article, there's whole heap of comments by "Englishpeople" themselves:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
;_; They make susi cry.
__________________
suchen. geben. lieben. leben.
|
|
||||
|
R.I.P. England.
__________________
"The two-party-system and the artificial division between left and right is especially malign because it confines people into mental prisons, from which they are almost not able to get out. Even in a one-party-system it is mentally easier to be "in the opposition", "against the system". In the two-party-system (which is in fact one-party-system as well), on the other hand, if the left is currently in the office and you are opposed to the system, it is automatically assumed that you are a "rightist", ie. supporter of the party of the right. And vice versa. Most people refuse to see that the two major parties are in fact one and the same party. Thus the liberal democracy, especially in its venomous two-party variety, is the most successful system of totalitarian manipulation ever invented. Each of the two parties usually has a very dedicated voting herd, needless to say." - "Marcus Marulus", Stirpes forum member |
|
||||
|
The undead will rise? >_>
__________________
suchen. geben. lieben. leben.
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Some of the more interesting quotations.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The consensus seems that this is a bad thing for England and that somethign must be done, but as to what? Who knows.
__________________
suchen. geben. lieben. leben.
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
'Dardanidae duri, quae uos a stirpe parentum prima tulit tellus, eadem uos ubere laeto
accipiet reduces. Antiquam exquirite matrem: hic domus Aeneae cunctis dominabitur oris, et nati natorum, et qui nascentur ab illis.' We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. –Plato– |
|
||||
|
Well they're screwing over those that contributed in my parents' generation. My parents contributed for nearly 50-60 years combined and they can't really claim much of their pension back, they don't get any increases. ;_; It's ridiculous that they contributed for so long and don't get anything back since they don't live in the UK anymore. I'd understand if they didn't contribute but they did.
Pensions are always controversial ._.
__________________
suchen. geben. lieben. leben.
|
|
||||
|
No offense, but this makes sense to me.
__________________
"The two-party-system and the artificial division between left and right is especially malign because it confines people into mental prisons, from which they are almost not able to get out. Even in a one-party-system it is mentally easier to be "in the opposition", "against the system". In the two-party-system (which is in fact one-party-system as well), on the other hand, if the left is currently in the office and you are opposed to the system, it is automatically assumed that you are a "rightist", ie. supporter of the party of the right. And vice versa. Most people refuse to see that the two major parties are in fact one and the same party. Thus the liberal democracy, especially in its venomous two-party variety, is the most successful system of totalitarian manipulation ever invented. Each of the two parties usually has a very dedicated voting herd, needless to say." - "Marcus Marulus", Stirpes forum member |
|
||||
|
How does it make sense? My parents contributed a part of their salary to the pension program. Fine. This works out to quite a bit of income since my mum worked nearly 30 years in the UK, for example. By contributing to the UK National Pension for 30 years, my mum isn't entitled to draw the income that she contributed to the system? That's just messed up point of view, in my opinion.
I'd understand if it was diminished slightly but she's still entitled to draw her pension for working those 30 years, isn't she?
__________________
suchen. geben. lieben. leben.
|