The Law Of Sweden: Indigenous Swedes must embrase rape by Muslim gangs

[Aptrgangr]

The Law Of Sweden: Indigenous Swedes must embrase rape by Muslim gangs


Needless to say, Swedish laws prohibiting "hate speech" against racial minorities have been vigorously enforced. There have, for example, been a number of gang-rapes of Swedish women by Muslim immigrants.
But Swedes must be careful what they say about them. On May 25, Bjorn Bjorkqvist was convicted and sentenced to two months hard labour in prison for writing,
"I don't think I am alone in feeling sick when reading about how Swedish girls are raped by immigrant gangs."
["Jag tror inte jag är ensam om att må dåligt när jag läser om hur svenska tjejer har våldtagits av invandrarhorder"]
In another recent case, a man living in the Bunkeflo neighborhood of Malmo sent an e-mail message to public officials saying he believed most Arabs were criminals, and that he opposed subsidies for them to move into his neighborhood.
"Bunkeflo," he wrote, "was one of the last few refuges in Malmo where you could go out and not see Arabs loitering all around you."
This man managed to avoid prison by paying a fine of 10 percent of his pre-tax income. Given Sweden's high taxation rate, this represented a figure of close to 20 percent of his actual yearly income.
But the most spectacular case so far -and one completely ignored by American media- is that of Swedish feminist Joanna Rytel.
Earlier this year, she wrote an article called "I Will Never Give Birth to a White Man," for a major Swedish daily, Aftonbladet. [Jag tänker aldrig föda en vit man, April 11, 2004]
Rytel explained why she hates white men -they are selfish, exploitative, vain, and sex-crazed- and just to make things clear, she added, "no white men, please -- I just puke on them, thank you very much." ["Dom spyr jag bara på, tack."]
She wrote that other than the women's restroom, she can find peace only in the segregated women's ISLAMIC prayer room in the mosque in central Stockholm:
"At least Muslim men don't mind that women have their own community in peace and quiet." She added that she might let a white man follow her home, but only because "I can have someone to talk with all night long about my hatred towards white men."
Members of the Swedish National Socialist Front -an admittedly pro-Nordic group- called the article to the attention of the Stockholm authorities. But they refused to indict Miss Rytel.
In a letter dated April 19, public prosecutor Göran Lambertz explained why:
"The purpose behind the law against incitement of ethnic hatred was to ensure legal protection for non-Swedish "guest-groups" of different compositions and followers of alien religions. Cases where people express themselves in a critical or derogatory way about men of ethnic Swedish background were not intended to be included in this law. Because of that, the content in this article cannot be considered incitement of ethnic hatred."
One Law for indigenous Swedes, another for the many "guests" of Sweden...


Publication: Secularislam.org

Source

A rather old article, worth being read, by the way noone schould think that little nickelwhore Rytel was a Swede

[svin]

Hm. That's strange surname. Rytel. Doesn't sound Polish to me. But I can be wrong.

I think she would be happy in traditional islamic society, having her clitoris cut off.

Having herself celebrated the birthday of her aborted child and set up an online forum for post-abortive parents, she believes women who abort pregnancies should feel no guilt. "Despite that it is a little sad to have an abortion. But one does it for the child's sake. It would not have been good to have a child half-heartedly. They have it much better in heaven than if they hade been born. I thought that it would be good to make jewellery, because then people can carry their happy abortion-children with them," she said.

OMG... No comments.

[Menydh]

But the most spectacular case so far -and one completely ignored by American media- is that of Swedish feminist Joanna Rytel.

Earlier this year, she wrote an article called "I Will Never Give Birth to a White Man," for a major Swedish daily, Aftonbladet. [Jag tänker aldrig föda en vit man, April 11, 2004]

Rytel explained why she hates white men -they are selfish, exploitative, vain, and sex-crazed- and just to make things clear, she added, "no white men, please -- I just puke on them, thank you very much." ["Dom spyr jag bara på, tack."]

She wrote that other than the women's restroom, she can find peace only in the segregated women's ISLAMIC prayer room in the mosque in central Stockholm:

"At least Muslim men don't mind that women have their own community in peace and quiet." She added that she might let a white man follow her home, but only because "I can have someone to talk with all night long about my hatred towards white men."

This reminded me of an article that I found a few years ago, at the peak of one the Nordicist hostilities against Europeans on Skadi. It was on an online feminist magazine, which I can't find anymore. I've found bits and pieces here and there. Don't miss it:

Now sit, Ingvar. Sit!

Young women in Sweden, Germany and Australia have a new cause: They want men to sit down while urinating. This demand comes partly from concerns about hygiene -- avoiding the splash factor -- but, as Jasper Gerard reports in the English magazine The Spectator, "more crucially because a man standing up to urinate is deemed to be triumphing in his masculinity, and by extension, degrading women." One argument is that if women can't do it, then men shouldn't either. Another is that standing upright while relieving oneself is "a nasty macho gesture," suggestive of male violence.

A feminist group at Stockholm University is campaigning to ban all urinals from campus, and one Swedish elementary school has already removed them. In Australia, an Internet survey shows that 17 percent of those polled think men ought to sit, while 70 percent believe they should be allowed to stand. Some Swedish women are pressuring their men to take a stand, so to speak. Yola, a 25-year-old Swedish trainee psychiatrist, says she dumps boyfriends who insist on standing. "What else can I do?," said her new boyfriend, Ingvar, who sits.

Another one that I've found on one of the sites that quotes the above text:

Back in Germany, men are losing their last bastion of masculinity: "German men are being shamed into urinating while sitting down by a gadget which is saving millions of women from cleaning up in the bathroom after them.

The WC ghost, a £6 voice-alarm, reprimands men for standing at the lavatory pan. It is triggered when the seat is lifted. The battery-operated devices are attached to the seats and deliver stern warnings to those who attempt to stand and urinate (known as 'Stehpinkeln')." Why not instead manufacture toilets with the seat permanently attached down? And won't the WC ghost simply make German men urinate standing but without lifting the seat?

German men were being admonished to pee sitting down by a gadget called the WC ghost; when the device detects a lifted toilet seat, it says, in German: "Hey, stand peeing ("Stehpinkeln") is not allowed here and will be punished with fines, so if you don't want any trouble, you'd best sit down." It was reported that the term for a man who pees sitting down, "Sitzpinkler," is a synonym for "wimp."

×øÏ£¬ ¶¼×øÏ£¡ - ƯÔÚº£Íâ - ÑÅ»¢ÉçÇø

These articles are from about 6 to 7 years ago, in 2000. At the time, they reminded me of what I had seen in England through the 90s.

As an example, one evening my ex-wife had asked me to go with her to a friend's of her for dinner. I didn't feel like it at all. I had already noticed how her friend looked at me, as if wishing that my ex-wife wasn't present to jump on me. She had noticed too, as she told me. She also told me that her friend had an affair with her boss. She had a successful career in a big company, a husband who was a lecturer of Architecture in some university, and two children..

One day, she arrived home and told her husband that she was leaving him and that she was taking the children with her. The man did nothing but to implore her not to leave him, broken in tears. What she didn't expect was that her boss, as soon as he saw her arriving with the children, refused to take her in. Of course he wanted a bitch, but not the sons of a bitch.. excuse the language.

When my ex-wife told me that when her friend went back home with the children, the husband only said how happy he was and never asked a word again, I first felt deeply sorry for him. But soon my feelings changed and I started to feel a deep contempt for him and much despise for her.

I told my ex-wife that I wasn't happy that she was a friend of such a bitch. She excused herself by saying that she didn't even like her, but since they knew each other from South Africa, where they had been working in the same company and lived nearby.. My ex-wife was a South African of an Afrikaner family. The bitch was South African too, but of a British family. The husband was typically English.

Anyway, I felt curious to meet such a.. man? So I agreed to go for the evening. Most unpleasant. During the dinner she wouldn't stop talking nonesense about her successful career and how often she had traveled to Spain and how much she like it. He looked as if he was on a corner apart on the table, as.. I couldn't explain in English. I tried to break the ice with him, asking a few questions directed to him. His answers were short and shy.. and always finished by her. It was starting to annoy me much.

After the dinner, I felt that I wouldn't be able to make it till the end of the evening without some help. So I asked for a whiskey while they drank Amarula, a South African drink somehow similar to Bailey's.

More of the same. She wouldn't stop talking to me. I would have thought that my ex-wife and her had much to talk to each other about South Africa, clothes, and whatever else. As she was talking I said "Excuse me..", smiled, turned my face at him and asked him about his lectures at university, as if I was interested in whatever he taught there. He managed to say a few words before she took the word from him and started to speak for him.. again!

And again, and again.. no matter how I was clearly ignoring her and interrupting her to try to make room for him in the conversation, she wouldn't give up.

I don't think that I'll ever forget those two. A few days later my ex-wife told me that her friend made her a comment about me, as an advance if you know what I mean. My ex-wife broke all relations with her.

I met him again a month or so later. My ex-wife told me that he had called her because she had left him again, and that he was literally destroyed. She asked me to take him out and try to cheer him up. I thought that if he got drunk I might still get a quarter of a man out of him. That was easy, he got drunk before finishing the second bottle of wine.. and broke into tears in the restaurant. I couldn't think of anything better to tell him but to jump into the Thames for a swim.. so I took him home instead.

I sometimes wonder about him. I'm not sure if I should blame it all on her.. or on him. It is the egg and the hen. For women to have turned like that, men must have allowed them to first. Or not?

England is a land of contrasts. It is either wimps.. or pimps.

[svin]

Interesting story, Mynydd. No need to say such people exist everywhere, maybe the proportions vary, but still... My friend's girlfriend family is very close to what you've described. And that's very hard for my friend too, because unlike her father, he doesn't like when women command him. But still, this woman is girlfriend's mother and he has to control his behaviour and he always tell me how sometimes hard it is.

Speaking of this woman, she is very interesting example. One of the rare people that can defend their own opinion even if it obviously wrong. And she never (!) excuses. Sometimes she makes her daughter cry, though she always waits for excuses from her, never do it herself.

[Menydh]

Proportions vary.. a lot! Feminism started in England long time ago and spread from there.

[Susi]

Men peeing standing up never seemed to be oppressive to me... :\

I always found it kind of difficult to comprehend.

[Marcus Marulus]

Originally Posted by Mynydd

I sometimes wonder about him. I'm not sure if I should blame it all on her.. or on him. It is the egg and the hen. For women to have turned like that, men must have allowed them to first. Or not?

You put the question and gave the answer at the time.

As to that Rytel, she is probably a Polish Jewess.

Having herself celebrated the birthday of her aborted child and set up an online forum for post-abortive parents, she believes women who abort pregnancies should feel no guilt. "Despite that it is a little sad to have an abortion. But one does it for the child's sake. It would not have been good to have a child half-heartedly. They have it much better in heaven than if they hade been born. I thought that it would be good to make jewellery, because then people can carry their happy abortion-children with them," she said.

This is the example of age-old Gnostic hatred of human life, which maintains that it is justified to sacrify life in the name of "higher principles". The whole ideology of the modern West is permeated with this perverse worldview. There is no essential difference between abortion clinics, American murderous wars and Soviet gulags. The same mentality, basically.

[Menydh]

Originally Posted by prometheus

As to that Rytel, she is probably a Polish Jewess.

Even if she were, I would advice against falling in the same and easy mistake as Americans, who point the Jews for everything just to take the blame out of themselves.

Sweden is one of the countries with more militant (and sympathsing) feminists, many of which hold views similar to Rytel's. And they are ethnic Swedes.

[Menydh]

If you thought that it couldn't get any more miserable for Sweden, think again:

The Local - Feminists refuse to rule out future elections
The Local - The Local\'s Blog » Blog Archive » Feminism is dead, long live feminism

Feministiskt initiativ

[Breogan]

Originally Posted by Mynydd

Even if she were, I would advice against falling in the same and easy mistake as Americans, who point the Jews for everything just to take the blame out of themselves.

Sweden is one of the countries with more militant (and sympathsing) feminists, many of which hold views similar to Rytel's. And they are ethnic Swedes.

Exactly, no Jews are necessary when you have politicians making their job, that is, selling his own country to the best purchaser.

It would be interesting asking this scum who is giving these comands, but I'm afraid I know the answer.

[Marcus Marulus]

Originally Posted by Mynydd

Even if she were, I would advice against falling in the same and easy mistake as Americans, who point the Jews for everything just to take the blame out of themselves.

I never fall in the mistake you are talking about, I don't blame Jews for everything. It was just my conjecture: "She may be a Jewess...", nothing more.

Today's policy in Europe is mostly in hands of politicians of ethnic European extraction, but these politicians are slaves to the Anglo-Masonic world government.

Sometimes ruling elites use Jews as their foot-soldiers, so to say, as memebers of different think-tanks and NGOs. Jews maybe have a disproportionately bigger propensity to embrace such ideology, because it coincides in certain points with their own messianism, which is bent on creating "heaven on earth."

No, I don't blame Jews for everything, far from that.

[Susi]

This reminds me of how much I really, really hate feminism.

I will be oppressed by patriarchal society if I want to. So oppressed in fact, that I can vote in the next election and I can do practically whatever I please (within legality/physically capableness).

I think the suffragettes were admirable, in a way, to get the right for women's vote, but other than that, I don't see how feminism should even exist today, it has served its purpose. (Unless the true purpose is to make men "the oppressed" due to their "crimes" against women...) Most men I know (as in, the ones I associate with) have treated me with nothing but respect, I don't see how they see men as oppressive (except when they are peeing, of course, then men are so oppressive ).

Damned Feminists are ruining everything for women.

[Menydh]

Originally Posted by prometheus

Sometimes ruling elites use Jews as their foot-soldiers, so to say

It happens the way round. Think of the US. There, it is Jews who have used people as labour. But it would be unfair to point only to the US.

Look at The Netherlands. Its history as a trade empire coincides with the arrival of Jews just earlier. Their empire was ruled by companies, of which there was a vast representation of Jewish shareholders and even directors.