|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Forum Rules | VB Image Host | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Environment News News on natural resources, forests, waterlands, seas & oceans, rivers, fisheries, agriculture, foods qualities. Global Warming. Ecology. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
3C hotter. Earth's danger point. Now scientists say it is going to happen Times On Line May 4, 2006 THE world will warm by 3C (5.4F) even under emissions projections for 2050 that leading scientists consider optimistic, the United Nations group that studies global warming has said. The increase, which would cause drought and famine for 400 million people and devastate wildlife, is predicted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in its most confident assessment yet of how greenhouse gases are affecting global temperatures. A draft of part of the panel’s fourth report, which the US Government has released on the internet, shows that it has, for the first time, placed a likely figure on the progress of global warming, indicating a level of scientific certainty that it has avoided in the past. It says that temperatures could increase by between 2C and 4.5C when atmospheric carbon dioxide reaches double the pre-industrial level, but it declares 3C to be the “most likely value” for such change. A 3C rise is the level at which a Met Office conference last year judged that “dangerous” climate change would occur. Previous reports from the IPCC, a traditionally cautious body, have given only wider ranges of possibilities, which it acknowledged to be highly uncertain. While the panel does not indicate when this rise will occur, experts think it probable that pre-industrial carbon dioxide levels will double by 2050, even given successful efforts to contain greenhouse gas emissions. Sir David King, Britain’s chief scientific adviser, has argued that stabilisation of carbon dioxide at this level — 550 parts per million — is the best target that the world can hope for, and his view is endorsed by many climatologists.A report issued by Sir David last month suggested that a 3C rise would put 400 million people at risk of starvation because of lost arable land and water shortages. As the figure is a global average larger increases could be expected in areas such as the South East of England, where a 4.5C increase could bring 25 per cent more rainfall in winter and 60 per cent less in summer. More extreme weather is also predicted, and rising sea levels would leave many coastal areas at risk of flooding. The draft document is the report of the IPCC’s Working Group I, which examines the physical science basis for climate change. The analysis of Working Groups II and III, which consider detailed consequences and mitigation strategies, have not been released. Its contents came to light yesterday when the journal Nature reported that the United States had published the draft on a website, inviting comments from experts and other interested groups. The unusual manner of its release has alarmed some scientists and environmental groups, who questioned whether the Bush Administration was seeking to defuse its bold conclusions before the final version is published in February. Roger Pielke Jr, of the University of Colorado, told Nature: “If the report is already out there in circulation, then the ‘news’ value is likely to be much diminished when the official report is finally released.” Friends of the Earth said that the US Government had repeatedly tried to undermine the IPCC in the past. Apart from providing the most precise estimates yet of the likely course of climate change, the document’s language is much more confident than that of the IPCC’s third report published in 2001. It points to decisive new evidence that the rising temperatures recorded over the past 50 years are the result of human activity and not natural variation. The pattern of warming ocean, surface and lower atmosphere temperatures, with melting ice at the poles and falling temperatures in the stratosphere, now make it “highly unlikely (less than 5 per cent)” that natural changes could be responsible. Catherine Pearce, of Friends of the Earth, said: “The implications of a 3C rise give a greater increase in urgency. What we need to see is reinforcement of the current EU target of 2C.” [source]
__________________
'Dardanidae duri, quae uos a stirpe parentum prima tulit tellus, eadem uos ubere laeto
accipiet reduces. Antiquam exquirite matrem: hic domus Aeneae cunctis dominabitur oris, et nati natorum, et qui nascentur ab illis.' We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. –Plato– |
|
||||
|
Link to the document "Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis", by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
__________________
'Dardanidae duri, quae uos a stirpe parentum prima tulit tellus, eadem uos ubere laeto
accipiet reduces. Antiquam exquirite matrem: hic domus Aeneae cunctis dominabitur oris, et nati natorum, et qui nascentur ab illis.' We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. –Plato– |
|
|||
|
Thank heaven for the Global heating! Yesterday we had real summer in Oslo, and it looks like today will be as fine. The melting of the polar ice caps are not so bad news for Norway, we just move up in the mountains. The lowlenders, Danes and Dutch may however experience it other ways... For the Danes share, they can all move to Greenland if Denmark should get too wet. The melting of the Greenland ice will make it possible to take out minerals, gas and oil to incalculable amounts. The melting can totally make Denmark 1000 times richer than ever before. Also the Nortwestern passage will be icefree again within 5-10 years, this changes traderoutes, tradepatterns and prices. Also a larger share of Greenland will sucsessively become greener, and it will be possible to grow corn there within 100 years. If I had money, I would buy land for my heirs at Greenland. Last edited by Savage; Friday, May 5th, 2006 at 14:55. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| None |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Love like a drug, scientists say | Aeternitas | Sexuality, Morality & Relationshˇps | 20 | Friday, March 14th, 2008 17:01 |
| scientists, not as smart as they think | Crvena zvezda | The Tabloid | 16 | Saturday, April 7th, 2007 00:53 |
| [Vote] What will happen with the E.U. Constitution? | Menydh | Politics | 29 | Tuesday, May 9th, 2006 23:37 |
| Does this happen to anyone else | Amadis | Help, Suggestions and Complaints. | 14 | Friday, April 1st, 2005 23:44 |