|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Forum Rules | VB Image Host | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Magna Europa est patria nostra STOP GATS! STOP LIBERALISM! |
|
||||
|
Quote:
BTW one day when you'll have some to time to spare, I would like you to explain the difference between "racial type/sub type" and "spectrum". I think I've got a slight idea when we talk about "nordomediterranid spectrum" but a definition would be welcome
__________________
![]() |
|
||||
|
Comparison of Aurignacid vs. Cromagnid, note especially the lower jaws:
![]() Now a comparison of a typical Nordid (or Mediterranid) vs. a typical Cromagnid lower jaw profile: Classic Aurignacoid (Nordid and Mediterranid) lower jaw profile: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() vs. a typical Cromagnoid jaw line which is almost straight (not all examples are just Cromagnoid): ![]() ![]() ![]() Rather Mediterranid variants (going after Coon at least) with Cromagnoid jaws: ![]() ![]() There is some overlap on this, which might or might not be attributed to the fact that "pure" Aurignacoid and Cromagnoid variants dont exist any more if they existed at all, but many variants are a cross. But for the Cromagnoid definition, this jaw line and angle together with the associated total facial height is an important traits. Typical Cromagnids should have the straight lower jaw angle and robust form, as well as a lower total facial height. Typical prominent examples, Ed Harris: ![]() Viggo Mortensen (rather Cromagnid jaw) vs. Ashton Holmes with a more Aurignacoid one: Max von Sydow: ![]()
__________________
Magna Europa est patria nostra STOP GATS! STOP LIBERALISM! |
|
||||
|
Quote:
What exactly do you want to know?
__________________
Magna Europa est patria nostra STOP GATS! STOP LIBERALISM! |
|
||||
|
By "combining" both, wouldn't we obtain pretty much the same that we see usually classified as one or the other?
I mean, doesn't the question imply the [flawed] assumption that types are more or less pure? And, in the hypothesis that we had two pure samples of each and combined them, what we would obtain would depend on which genes are dominant/recessive for each trait, on each type..
__________________
'Dardanidae duri, quae uos a stirpe parentum prima tulit tellus, eadem uos ubere laeto
accipiet reduces. Antiquam exquirite matrem: hic domus Aeneae cunctis dominabitur oris, et nati natorum, et qui nascentur ab illis.' We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. –Plato– |
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() What we will have from combo of Cromagnoid and Aurignacid? Aurignacid or Cromagnoid? What traits of these types are stronger ? Et cetera...
__________________
![]() |
|
||||
|
To begin with, to answer another question I came to hear, both Cromagnoids and Aurignacoid types and variants can be more or less progressive.
Quote:
Quote:
With some Cromagnoid traits like the jaw form being probably less important for the classic specialisations, so they could survive even if all other traits being adapted to the new environment and standards necessary for survival. This is even more true for generally non-adaptive traits which being used by modern anthropology to reconstruct ancient relations similar to the analysis of sexual genetic markers. Quote:
__________________
Magna Europa est patria nostra STOP GATS! STOP LIBERALISM! |
|
|||
|
Quote:
precise and inspirational. I had to register here to ask a few questions. "I could bring other hypothesis in, but thats something I already did elsewhere and its not really proven yet." please point us where this thread specificly is though i think i have read almost all of your posts. With regards to another thread somewhere else distinguishing between capellid and cromagnid and asking the contributors to choose one of the mentioned types, i tend to think that , though i may have misunderstood, you tend to classify the high vaulted and low vaulted narrow heads under the same division, for example, like what Coon had proposed, long barrow and corded people to the Aurignacid. Then the cromagnid lineage, whose dolichocephaly is due to a archaic and special shape: the unsual long anteroposterior diameter, alpine, borreby, pamirid would be the partially reduced cromagnid tree. kind regards |
|
||||
|
Classic Cromagnids are definitely rather a hunter and gatherer type with a high energetic level. They can deal very well with cold as well as changing climate (seasons), but need, as mentioned, a lot of energy. They might also be more often viscoes/slow schizothymic (especially the broad-robust build individuals), rather than sensitive or energetic classic schizothymic personalities, like they are typical especially for the taller-robust Aurignacid variants. They can stand a lot, as long as they have the sufficient energy, but are probably somewhat less flexible both with their movements as well as psychically.
So again one could speculate about selection going after group size, social relations and different competitive strategies common in a group etc. But thats all just speculative.
__________________
Magna Europa est patria nostra STOP GATS! STOP LIBERALISM! |
|
|||
|
Quote:
the shape identifies the plan, design. heavy bones are made for heavy work and to carry weight. for example a gorilla has a very big lower jaw to grind the available nutients and to carry that heavy jaw the cranium must be bony and strong i am not going into detail about the possible mechanism. Therefore without a diet which is somehwta similar to the neolithics i dont think that augrinacians wolud have a so weak chin that relieves the upper face free from weight of a lower face and lead to dolichocephaly by means of a diet which not so much protein rich and probably also excluded roots and any other possible gatherer style hard-to-chew nutrients. Any dolichocephal phenotype would not be tall originally. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() |