|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Forum Rules | VB Image Host | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Compare Rick Astley (Phalian) with William Hague (Borreby)
![]() In Coon's taxonomy Phalian or Faelid didnt exist, they were all Borreby, perhaps Coon would have considered Phalians "unreduced" Borreby types. |
|
|||
|
Actually, in The Races of Europe Coon outlandishly proposed that Dalo-Phalids were Nordid-Borreby mixtures. This certainly made it easier for him to claim large parts of Germany as Borreby rather than Nordoid-Cromagnoid.
It's the same simplistic static view of race that gave us: - "Re-emergence" as an explanation for Alpinisation. - Alpinid-Atlantopontid-Iranoid (Cappadocian) mixtures as an explination for Dinaricisation (Alpinid = short head, Atlanto = long face, "Cappadocian" = convex nose, "exaggerated length of the face" = couldn't explain, obviously) - Neanderthal admixture as an explanation for Cro-Magnon. - A predominantly North African neolithic origin for Mediterranids in Iberia |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| None |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Phalian? | mothdust | Physical Anthropology | 4 | Friday, June 24th, 2005 02:17 |