Stirpes  

Go Back   Stirpes > Spirituality & Social Sciences > Religion & Theology > Christianity

Christianity Issues concerning all Christians, regardless of denomination.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)     Quote this post in a PM
Old Tuesday, March 29th, 2005
Perun's Avatar
Veteran Member
 
Last Online: Monday, June 30th, 2008 19:09
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 935
Perun is considered wise by the elders.Perun is considered wise by the elders.Perun is considered wise by the elders.Perun is considered wise by the elders.Perun is considered wise by the elders.Perun is considered wise by the elders.
Default Christ's atonement

http://jkalb.org/node/562

Christ's atonement

Why did Christ have to die to make up for our sins? People today find the idea stupid and brutal. Why couldn't God have given us a way out of them without letting his own son be tortured to death in such a horrible manner? What does the one thing have to do with the other apart from some primitive sense of divine vengeance or legalistic bookkeeping?

It seems to me that outlook on this issue is wrong and based on a denial of the moral seriousness of the world and the reality of man's actions in it. The modern liberal and technocratic view is that the rational goal of all action is utilitarian — maximizing pleasure, minimizing pain, and the like. Suppose, though, that God wanted to achieve some non-utilitarian good, like making man godlike rather than merely animal? To do so he would have to give man's actions genuine importance, and in particular give him the power of doing real evil that has real effects in the real world. If that were God's purpose, then Christ's sacrificial death becomes comprehensible and even uniquely fitting as a way of maintaining the seriousness of human action while offering man forgiveness. God accepts in his own person the effects of the evil we do and so frees us from it without making it something other than what it is.

The foregoing doesn't persuade us today. It seems a put-up job, as if God were doing something pointless and horrible to create a dramatic effect and impress people. Wouldn't it be more Godlike to ignore appearances, and do what's right and solve the problem in the most humane way possible?

I think the reason we look at the matter that way is that we are too thoroughly utilitarian. We simply can't conceive of action that is justified by what it is, by the world it expresses and creates, rather than by the external this-worldly goals it achieves. For us everything is manipulative. That's why modern civilization is radically antiartistic, that's why the church has rejected the ancient liturgy, and that's why we find God inconceivable and the world meaningless. Something doesn't acquire meaning by bringing about what we want, it acquires it by making present to us something that transcends all desire. And that is something that is now beyond our conception.

Jim Kalb
__________________
"Everything begins in mysticism and ends in politics."
--Charles Peguy

"Love for a man's own nation must not make a man into a wild animal, which tears down and provokes revenge; it must make him more noble, so that he can gain the respect and love of other nations for his nation. Therefore love toward your own nation is not contradictory to love for the whole of mankind; they complement each other. All of the nations are children of God."
--Cardinal Alojzije Stepinac, 1938
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
None


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Writings of Alexander Kalomiros Sergius Orthodox Church 2 Monday, May 26th, 2008 14:22
Seraphim Rose: Signs of the Times Sergius Orthodox Church 9 Tuesday, October 16th, 2007 02:25
Kant and Kierkegaard: The subjectivization of faith Arthur Gordon Pym Religion & Theology 0 Saturday, August 11th, 2007 22:19
Protestantism Prussian Christianity 10 Sunday, June 4th, 2006 22:03
Catholicism: The Basics Faísca Catholicism 1 Thursday, April 7th, 2005 20:38

Locations of visitors to this page

All times are GMT. The time now is 21:33.

Page generated in 0.3403111 seconds with 14 queries.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0