|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Forum Rules | VB Image Host | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Ok, I'll bite.
Basically, it came down to the fact that having a family provided too much of a conflict of interest for the priest. One cannot effectively administer to the needs of a congregation when they have a family to take care of as well. Dates/appointments could conflict, and family issues could take precedence over Church issues. It's best to just avoid the whole thing. The other side of this, (and this is what forced the Church to change it's stance on priest marriage in the first place, though it doesn't apply now), is that in the middle ages, the priest owned the Church and everything in it. When he died,his estate would get split up amongst his children, which, needless to say, caused all sorts of problems. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| None |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| History of Freemasonry | Marcus Marulus | Freemasonry & The Anglosphere | 41 | Tuesday, April 1st, 2008 01:39 |
| Courtship, Love and Marriage in Viking Scandinavia | Aptrgangr | Sexuality, Morality & Relationsh¡ps | 0 | Tuesday, October 16th, 2007 04:38 |
| The "Magisterium" of Vatican II | Faísca | Catholicism | 1 | Thursday, November 30th, 2006 02:06 |
| Catholicism & Vows | Ederico | Catholicism | 0 | Sunday, February 20th, 2005 16:09 |
| The Zincali - An Account of the Gypsies of Spain (George Borrow) | Antiquarian | History | 22 | Friday, January 7th, 2005 11:28 |