One problem, perhaps the biggest, in public debate is the dichotomy between inclusive Newspeak terms such as anti-racism, tolerance, diversity, multi-culturalism, etc. and their alleged opposites. When applying for instance the term anti-racist to a line of thought that is economically globalist, anti-traditionalist and so forth, opposing said policy is by default racist. This is well-known, of course, and not my invention.

Please, help me back this up with literary examples. I believe...

Sergius