Delbáeth

[M.R.]

Delbáeth banned? Wtf?

[Savorgnan]

I'm as shocked as you.

[Weltschmerz]

Originally Posted by M.R.

Delbáeth banned? Wtf?

Yes. He was infracted some days ago for unauthorised release of personal information of a fellow member. But he kept denying he did something wrong despite it was explained to him. Then he released more information about the same member, while also saying he didn't care if it was wrong.

[Kernunnos]

Originally Posted by Gnist

Yes. He was infracted some days ago for unauthorised release of personal information of a fellow member. But he kept denying he did something wrong despite it was explained to him. Then he released more information about the same member, while also saying he didn't care if it was wrong.

And, such personal info, in the area the leaked member lives (I was explained this in detail by Aptr privately) , could be used by hostile forces to cause him physical harm.

It seems delbaeth refused openly to comply to Stirpes rules, leaking sensitive data.

A bit shocking, and evil of him.

[Carnyx]

I'm posting this as I was kindly asked to.

Originally Posted by Delbaeth

I have been accused of evil! I have been accused of endangering the life of another member here at Stirpes be releasing his “sensitive”, “private” and “personal” information.

What do I say to this?

Perhaps, in the future, he would do well not to make a public website and a public Yahoo profile for the entire world to see.

So, will Stirpes now close down the Anthropology and Genetics section, considering how much “sensitive”, “private” and “personal” information is posted here (Pictures and personal information) without others permission?

[Kernunnos]

Originally Posted by Carnyx

I'm posting this as I was kindly asked to.

I have checked the member's in question profile and there is nothing of what Delbaeth claims.

So Dealbaeth must have known the member's real identity from another context.

In any case if he has insisted on revealing private data when asked not to he has shown a degree of dangerousness.

Our political positions can make us unpopular and targets of certain powerful groups too, so pretending not to keep silence on our identities when required is factually an hostile behavior.

[Carnyx]

Originally Posted by Kernunnos

I have checked the member's in question profile and there is nothing of what Delbaeth claims.

So Dealbaeth must have known the member's real identity from another context.

He's telling me the real ID that he just had to google was made public on this other forum which begins with a A.

Our political positions can make us unpopular and targets of certain powerful groups too, so pretending not to keep silence on our identities when required is factually an hostile behavior.

True.

[Menydh]

I don't condone what he did and I've left him known my disappointment. However, it is also truth that the pictures of the said member had been posted by himself on previous occasions, on several forums. I believe that included Stirpes.

[orieleye]

Originally Posted by Savorgnan

I'm as shocked as you.

With a pretty girl like that in your signature? Impossible!

[Musaka]

Originally Posted by Kernunnos

I have checked the member's in question profile and there is nothing of what Delbaeth claims.

So Dealbaeth must have known the member's real identity from another context.

In any case if he has insisted on revealing private data when asked not to he has shown a degree of dangerousness.

Our political positions can make us unpopular and targets of certain powerful groups too, so pretending not to keep silence on our identities when required is factually an hostile behavior.

That is often happening when somebody dont have nothing important to do in his life, so he is going around and act liketelling everything to everybody about somebody's life,instead of looking about his onw business..sad to see,but it isnt unusual,happend quite often,actually

[Strengthandhonour]

I know a lot of you raise up the question that the individual whose information was revealed had previously posted it, however I urge you to take a closer look at the rules:


7. The posting of images, videos and audio recordings of Members and Ex-Members, or any other information that makes them identifiable as real persons, even if previously publicly shared, is not permitted. The revelation of personal and private information of Members and Ex-Members, or, potentially, of other private persons, that can breach their privacy, even if that information has previously been publicly shared, is not permitted.

It is a bad situation and many options were explored. However, the number issue was that Delbaeth refused to acknowledge what he did was wrong and therefore, ignored the forum rules and the authority of the staff.

[M.R.]

Why can't I reply to thread in bans section? What is this?

Anyway, I guess he did broke the rule, but ban over that? Come on... Like we didn't have so few members here already...

[Weltschmerz]

Originally Posted by M.R.

Why can't I reply to thread in bans section? What is this?

Anyway, I guess he did broke the rule, but ban over that? Come on... Like we didn't have so few members here already...

It's not just about breaking a rule. What is more important, to have him here? Or to respect the integrity of our members? I am sure that if we don't set our priorities straight, we will have even less people posting. I cannot believe the number of people defending Delbaeth. None of you had a good argument to back it up, in my not so humble opinion.



P.S. I don't know why you couldn't reply. Thread is open, and you should be able to post.

[eurofighter]

Originally Posted by Gnist

I cannot believe the number of people defending Delbaeth. None of you had a good argument to back it up, in my not so humble opinion.

I'm backing you up. He really offended fellow members and I think that shouldn't be part of a forum, where we all are to strengthen and support each other for the common cause, as I thought, at least.

[Kernunnos]

Originally Posted by M.R.

Why can't I reply to thread in bans section? What is this?

Anyway, I guess he did broke the rule, but ban over that? Come on... Like we didn't have so few members here already...

This is not so wrong, but in the case of delbaeth I think his behavior was foreboding a potentially dangerous future.

After all, it is more effective a little but serious opinion group than a large group with many non serious members.

Think of the case of Stormfront, its political effect on US society will ever be zero, because average people will ever escape it.

[Arthur Gordon Pym]

Originally Posted by Kernunnos

Think of the case of Stormfront, its political effect on US society will ever be zero, because average people will ever escape it.

What does "average people" mean?