Which Europid type(s) are the more attractive, to your taste?

[Cirrus]

Err...where is the poll now ?

[Menydh]

The poll has been deleted as it was not all that consistent with the existing types. We are waiting to come up with a new list of types for a new poll or a new thread/poll.

In the meantime, this is the old list:

Robust Mediterranids (Atlanto-Mediterranean, Pontids)
Gracil Mediterraneans
Med-Nordic Mediterranean estabilized blends (Nordo-Mediterraneans, North-Atlantids)
Classic Nordics (Hallstadt or Gotatyp, East-Nordics)
Keltic-Nordic
CroMagnonid-Nordic blends
Unreduced Cro-Magnonids
Partially reduced Cro-Magnonids (Borreby, Baltids)
Alpinids
East-Baltics and / or Lappoids, Lapponized blends
Dinarids (Adriatid and Norics included)
No type/sub-type in particular, I rather go for Multiple Europoid admixture
Extra-European Europids (arabids, armenids, indids, Iranids, name it)
Non Europids and or Mixed Race

This is a new proposal that I have received via PM:

1-Robust Mediterranid (Atlanto-Mediterraneans, Pontids)
2-Gracil Mediterraneans
3-Nordid-Mediterranean blends (Nordo-med, North-Atlantids, North-Pontids)
4-"Classic" Nordics (Hallstadt, east-Nordic)
5-keltic
6-Nordic-CroMagnonid blends
7-Unreduced Cro-Magnonids
8-Partially reduced Cro-Magnonids (Baltids, Borreby)
9-East-Baltids and/or Lappoids
10-Alpinids
11-Alpinoid blends
12-Dinarics (adriatids and norics)
13-No Europid type in particular, I go for multiple Europid blends
14-RECIDIVIST MISCENEGATOR (Extra-European Europids, non-Europids, mixed race)

And this would be my proposal:

1-Auregnacoid / Robust Mediterranid (Atlanto-Mediterraneans, Pontids)
2-Western Mediterranids
3-Atlantids
4-Eastern Mediterranids
5-Nordic and Mediterranean blends (Nordo-Mediterraneans, North-Atlantids, North-Pontids)
6-Keltic Iron Age
7-"Classic" Nordics (Hallstat, East-Nordic)
8-Nordic-Cromagnoid blends
9-Unreduced Cromagnoids (name)
10-Partially reduced Cromagnoids (Baltids, Borreby)
11-Borealoids (East-Baltids, Lappoids)
12-Reduced Cromagnoids (Alpinids, Berids)
13-Dinarics (adriatids and norics)
14-No Europid type in particular, I go for multiple Europid blends
15- [fill other types]

I think that there are types left out, especially from the northern spectrum.

Please, feel free to add/modify types.

[Cirrus]

Wow. I think there are too much propositions. I couldn't choose !

Can't you bring some of them together ?

[Menydh]

No need. The old poll was single-option. The new poll should be multiple-option. So you will be able to vote on more than one.

Shame that polls don't allow to state a preference on choices, like per points.

[Ykksyb]

Should we make a poll to chose what poll selection ?

[OneEnglishNorman]

I would vote for in no particular order,

Troenders & Anglo-Saxons, North-Atlantids & North-Atlantid/Bruenn mixtures.

[FlashVoyager]

Originally Posted by Mynydd

Atlantid is not a Nordo-Mediterranean blend. North-Atlantid is.

That was never my notion. I voted fore Atlantid and then I just stated that I prefer women of the Aurignacid physical type in general, and used Mediterranid and the Nordid type as examples since they are classical Aurignacids.

[Menydh]

All fair, but we shouldn't open a new poll until ALL types are mentioned in the list.

So please, tell which other types you would add to the list that you have not seen yet in the lists presented so far, and which others you would modify from those lists.

[thulimo]

Don't forget do add an option representing negative attitude to the idea of the poll. Something like "I've got my own sense of beauty."
People, you are trying to squeeze human attractiveness, which is strictly individual, to some abstract constructs, which haven't even been studied properly.

[svin]

Thulimo, I don't think that this poll should be taken too seriously. Obviously, I don't inspect my potential girlfriend's subrace and only then decide should I go out with her or not.

[Menydh]

But you do have certain preferences/ideals, which match more with some types and less with others, right?

True that at the end of the day, the character can help weigh the balance in favour (or against) one less expected type.

[thulimo]

Originally Posted by svin

Thulimo, I don't think that this poll should be taken too seriously. Obviously, I don't inspect my potential girlfriend's subrace and only then decide should I go out with her or not.

It shouldn't.

Originally Posted by Mynydd

But you do have certain preferences/ideals, which match more with some types and less with others, right?

Well, probably...

[Occidentian]

Med modified by Atlantid.

Paz Vega and a lot of Spaniards are pretty much flawless to me.

On a side note, I do like Keltic-Nordids second to them.

What can I say? I'm attracted to people of my same background types.

[Truth-Finder]

Originally Posted by Mynydd

The poll has been deleted as it was not all that consistent with the existing types. We are waiting to come up with a new list of types for a new poll or a new thread/poll.

In the meantime, this is the old list:

This is a new proposal that I have received via PM:

And this would be my proposal:
I think that there are types left out, especially from the northern spectrum.

Please, feel free to add/modify types.

Mynydd's proposal is interesting though "Aurignacid" embraces all atlanto-Med, Pontids, Gracil-Meds and nordids; I think ascribing atlanto-Med and pontids only to "aurignacids" that makes think that they are aurignacid forms that remained unchanged since the UP times.
On the other side I think there is much confusion with the Atlantid term; I think this term was coined for the first time in 1961 by a polish anthropologist to designate a NW nordic-AM estabilized blend with the AM element being predominant but it was Lundman and that filthy amateur called McCoulogh (or what ever his ortograph is) who created the confusion with their "palaeo-atlantid" term which is in fact a dark cro-magnonoid variant........isn't it?

[Kaliausia]

1.East baltid
2.West baltid
3.Uralid
4.Alpinid

[Tuurikerttu]

Originally Posted by Occidentian

What can I say? I'm attracted to people of my same background types.

That is the most natural thing of course

The most harmonious and happy looking couples I've seen are often so similar to each others that they could be siblings by looks. This of course does not mean they are necessarily closely related to each others (which is genetically a bad thing). The only thing that can beat that is similar mental characteristics.