[Susi]

Originally Posted by Crvena zvezda

Not always. In some cases it involves synthetic chemicals that stimulate hormone production.

Oki.

Not aware of that fact. But when I do I will place the sites.

Thank you.

From what I've read itt's hard to have a chold taken away from a parent. Since you live in the west you obviously have more knowledge of the court system their then I do.

It isn't where I live, it's because my mother is a social worker-- she doesn't take children away anymore, but she used to when my parents lived in England. I think there has to be sufficient evidence but usually if the child is being abused, neglected, et cetera, and someone reports it, there will be an investigation.

Naturally occuring medicines tend not to have side effects and if they do the side-effect is worse. It's kind of like tobacco, pure tobacco plants are bad but yet the stuff processed in factories is worse for it contains over 15,000 chemicals including fermaldahide.

What about disinfectant? Will you outlaw this too?

Tobacco is bad for you no matter how it comes.

I didn't comment since their was no point. My view is and always shall be that any thing man made that prevents conception (point of fertilization) should be illegal. My view will never change.

Then your support of condoms is hypocritical. They prevent conception and they are manmade.

Actually that's wrong. My view might change but only when Orthodox nations stop facing the threat of a muslim invasion by Turks, Albanians, once are infideals are de-Turkified, once constantinople is liberated from the Turkish yoker, and other Muslim threats.

View on what, exactly?