[Tennyson]

Originally Posted by Mynydd

Ideologically speaking, I am not a racialist. I do acknowledge race as an element for national identity. But I too acknowledge culture, spirituality, history and heritage continuity as elements for national identity. As an [ethnic] nationalist none of those elements alone could ever replace my identity. In other words, I don't see other option but national integrity.

Well, you don't think that race is less of criterion for national identity but you build your concept of nation to be more exclusionist on the basis of culture and other such things.

This is different with, for example, Americans. Failing to have an ethnic identity, they clinge to ideas constructed around broader concepts often rather blurry and unreal.

American identity has always revolved around race. From the 1700s to the Civil War you had to be "White" (defined as being of European or unmixed Semitic descent) to be an American citizen.

From the Civil War to 1940s you had to be either White or a Negro to be an American citizen. Orientals, Indians, Afghans, Turks, natifve Amerindians (to the 1920s) and other such peoples were excluded.

Economic considerations are what politicians have used to excuse the phenomenon of immigration.

Exactly and that is the reason they are so important. They misuse statistics to excuse their multicultural agenda. For example, when they talk about the economic benefits of immigration they group together American engineers who come to work for European companies and Third World immigrants. The key to success for European nationalists is to expose these hoaxes.

It is utopistic to think that Europeans would embrace ideological nationalism again if the large immigrant populations which constitute a powerful voting block are not deported which can be justified also with pragmatic, economic arguments.

Make no mistake here. If Europe is ever to get out of this chaos it will require strong and long sacrificing in terms of economics. And the way that things are, I can tell you that Europeans are not willing to do that. This is more true in the West than in the East, which is why some perceive that Russia might be the nation where things might explode first. But, unfortunately, this is likely to be only a mirage as in Eastern Europe they have been "catching up" with Western Europe.

I am of the opinion that considerable economic and social advantages could be obtained if the unassimilated/criminal, unemployed and unproductive majority of Third World immigrants would be deported and immigration from developing countries radically restricted.