View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)     Quote this post in a PM
Old Wednesday, January 10th, 2007
Aptrgangr's Avatar
Aptrgangr Aptrgangr is offline
Nec temere - Nec timide
 
Last Online: 2 Hours Ago 12:31
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Deutschland/Germany
Posts: 1,589
Aptrgangr 's wisdom is legendary.Aptrgangr 's wisdom is legendary.Aptrgangr 's wisdom is legendary.Aptrgangr 's wisdom is legendary.Aptrgangr 's wisdom is legendary.Aptrgangr 's wisdom is legendary.Aptrgangr 's wisdom is legendary.Aptrgangr 's wisdom is legendary.Aptrgangr 's wisdom is legendary.Aptrgangr 's wisdom is legendary.Aptrgangr 's wisdom is legendary.
Default Re: freedom and political structures

Quote:
Originally Posted by Waarnemer
i wonder what the members opinion is about freedom and the political structures that should come with it.
In fact we have less freedom due to this current political structures than we could have.
The representative democracy we have here in all western democtacies in fact does not represent he people, it represents parties and lobby groups. People going to vote every x years surely can choose one of the partie listed on the ballot paper, but they have no influence on what this party is doing next. FRG's (Federal Republic of Germany) vice-chancellor Müntefering, leader of the SPD (Social Democrats) once said to reporters it was "unfair" to remind him to the promises he made before the elections. Joining a party in order to influence policy also does not make sense since all parties have to follow certain laws never having granted by the people, but by politicans following the ruling ideology = liberal democracy. In FRG parties have to accept the rules and laws according to the so called Grundgesetz "Basic Law" which never has been granted by the German people. All constitutions in western democracy purposefully ignore people's wishes in order to create a new society, the liberal multicultural society.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waarnemer
Is the democratic system we enjoy one of freedom and human rights or is it used as hypocritical tool to give us a falls feeling of independent freedom?
The democratic order promises "checks and balances", meaning the forces are independent and controlled. A closer look shows e.g judges of all courts are as independent from their governments as lackey from their masters. Who appoints the judges? Who is their supervisor? When all is this free and independent, why is there control of media then? I am aware, it is said media is free, but just try to introduce a dissident paper somewhere in Europe that criticizes the ruling order a such and not just in parts. Berlin's Police vice commander had to resign over the simple statement foreign people are committing much more crimes than indigenous people.
Human rights: Settling foreign ethnicities in an already settled area, suppressing these indigenous people, is called "ethnic cleansing". Serious ethnic cleaning taks place here in Europe - of course the politicans are responsible for that subscribed to UN laws outlawing any ethnic cleansing an dnever would describe this phenomenon as such.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waarnemer
Do we live in a disguised governmental structure of absolute authority?
We do not see absolute authority like we see it in absolutely totalitarian states, but it developes in this direction. There are e.g. well known Muslim terrorists living all over Europe. Instead of deporting them there are more and more "anti-terror" laws. In fact someone planning a suicide attck is not interested in the fact there are biometric data saved at Police computers or not. But Police easilier can control their own people, where they meet and what they buy.
__________________
Alsbald kriegen ihre Strafe
Der böse Turko und der Zuave
Reply With Quote