Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Janez
Point taken, but honestly... sereš  |
Please, stop speaking in Hungarian... what does szeres mean?
You misunderstood.
I'm saying that today's level of economic strength of Slovenia or Greece,
(the way they are at 2005)
would be something that other Balkan countries would've achieved if there was no war ( and if they still did split ).
Slovenia and Greece would probably be even more advanced economically,
thanks to being in the vicinity of growing economies.
Countries like Bulgaria and Romania lost billions of $ because of the wars in their neighbourhood.
But, what's important to mention is that the Balkan region mostly has economies that would be competing with one another, thus pushing one another down.
Quote:
|
This hasn't been the case in ol' Yugoslavia either. Rest assured that I'd prefer the state of affairs you speculated about. That way Slovenia would probably be more Slovenian today.
|
Well, yes... if there was for no war, there would be less immigration.
btw. I read in the papers about how our healthcare
asks the foreign humanitarian organizations to stop sending them
'humaniarian aid' because only 30% of all the aid can be used, the other 70% is junk which is decades past its expiry date, and it costs us more to
destroy this 'help', than it would cost us to buy new!
Once more, it's a media-friendly way of burdening a country's economy.
The west sends us useless waste, labelled as 'humanitarian aid', which burdens the budget of our healthcare, and to their brainwashed masses
it all sounds like they are merciful angels.