[Menydh]

Originally Posted by dorje

anarcho-communist to the extent that I am in opposition of borders and passports as indicators of nationality and belonging. the anarcho-communist system encourages the development of voluntary associations (clans, tribes, families, etc.), destroying the false global humanism, making true compassions within these smaller groups possible. each group will be run in whatever way it is desired, and the members of the group will never be corrupted by power.

How about the group(s) wanting to keep their national borders as a means to protect and to preserve their national (read [greater] clan/tribe/family) identity? The end of the Anarcho-Communist dream brought about by its own nature?

irredentist to the extent that I hope to be able to preserve, for instance, rumanian culture on rumanian soil. even without the 'nation,' but based on the people of the nation, instead.

That is not what Irredentism is about. Please, read here: Irredentism: An Inevitable Tendency of Ethnic Nationalism