View Single Post
  #29 (permalink)     Quote this post in a PM
Old Thursday, July 20th, 2006
Gil's Avatar
Gil Gil is offline
Grand Member
 
Last Online: Monday, March 31st, 2008 14:26
Join Date: Jan 2005
Age: 26
Posts: 2,390
Gil is a sage.Gil is a sage.Gil is a sage.Gil is a sage.Gil is a sage.Gil is a sage.Gil is a sage.Gil is a sage.Gil is a sage.
Default Re: On Nordo-Germanic supremacism (comments)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Agrippa
There was rather racial-population continuity in that area though. The early Neolithic influences (genetically) might have been rather minor. Furthermore what do you mean with iron working?
The crucial point (for expansion) was long before, as you say, but, and keep in mind i'm using the Gimbutas theory here, she also stated that it was the Kurgan culture (probably in it's expansion southwards) that gave origin to the development of iron tools and not the othe way around (metal working coming from a South Eastern source). She called this the "secondary Urheimat" and also "late PIE expansion".



Quote:
Originally Posted by Agrippa
And the harsh climate disappeared already earlier, what has that to do with population continuity in much later Neolithic times?
Because in the original "Urheimat" (to use her terminology" conditions weren't exactly favourable and you probably agree with me that no matter when these pressures occur they always have impact on populations.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Agrippa
the dominant type in most Kurgan graves was Cromagnoid (with Mediterranoid and Nordoid).
You mean Kurgan graves "proper" or, after their expansion, in new settled territories? I'm asking cause in the later case there might be some intermediary types present.
__________________


Last edited by Gil; Thursday, July 20th, 2006 at 17:09.
Reply With Quote