[Menydh]

Originally Posted by Agrippa

Its known that the Italics seem to have come from the North, bringing Nordoid elements with them, so the chances might not be very high but there.

Romans being a mixed population composed mostly of Mediterranean, Dinaric and perhaps Alpine, and not being straightforward clear the difference between some Mediterraneans and some Nordics, Ockam's razor applies.

However, I would not argue against if people made a fair comparison and presented it as alternative probabilities, though still applying good and common sense at all time.

This was a comment by a Nordicist, but what does that mean, that he must be wrong? Of course not. If one would want to try to deny what Earlson wrote here, one would have to prove that Cato wasnt light pigmented, what would mean together with his anatomical type a lot. Though I think he has obvious and strong Dinaroid influences in any case, the second and dominant element should be Nordid if going after that.

I'm afraid that you fail to see why the argument has been brought into discussion.

If Nationalists' little resources and few time must be wasted in disproving each and every of these claims, we might as well stop here and go home, sit next to the window and look how the next group of North Africans, Sub-Saharans, Asians, Turks or Amerindians disembarks and take a few meters more of the streets of our cities.

In other words, someone who brings up such issues especially in these times is a complete retard. Alternatively he might be just a vulgar swindler making money from a number of retards through selling that nonsense first on a book form and next on a [cheaper to produce] CD.

If the intended retarded target to steal from are Americans, I wouldn't give a monkey's foot. But it changes when it is another European with who we have to make a common cause if we want to survive. Whether I like them or not. Although it makes it easier if I don't dislike them (no need to like them, not absolutely everyone is necessary to build in the future).

And that's been the case in forums like Stormfront or Skadi. I don't see how helping create and spread a trash under-culture is the right thing to do.

Facts stay facts no matter who states it, to prove the opposite one has to prove that the premises were wrong, and thats especially for Italy in which to this time Nordid being obviously present very difficult. Individual cases can be settled down more or less others never can without more informations about them which are hard or impossible to get...

Refer to above.


Just today we had a lunch (it's July 18th ). On our way to the place, we had a talk on these and other issues as I've been trying to find an information which I read long time ago.

I think it was in the XVth century that during some council the Swedes reclaimed the Gothic heroic heritage as theirs on the grounds of Gothland and the remaining Goths in Scandinavia. The answer of the Spanish delegation was clear, that those left behind were the lazy Goths, and that the blood of the heroic Goths was to be found in the Spanish.

Then, someone has recalled that Julius Evola argued along the same lines, pointing to the difference between the Nordic spirit and the Nordic phenotype. So if you understand me, the wheel turns. But, would it be of any use that I now made of it a central issue?

I might decide to have some fun with this in the near future.


P.S. There are more --and more important-- concerns raised with my first post, and which should not be dodged as they are central to the main issue.