[A follow-up discussion to the thread
"Classify eternal enemies: Hannibal and Scipio"]
With regards to the classification of Scipio, some would point to the Götta type as a gracile Nordic sub-type, and therefore taxonomically similar to the Gracile-Mediterranean type.
In the lights of it, confusion is highly possible. Apparently, some say that it is not rare to tell the difference from just the crania.
In such cases there are three possible solutions to the problem:
- to use a Mediterraneanist approach and classify the sample as Mediterranean in absolute terms
- to use a Nordicist approach and classify the sample as Nordic in absolute terms
- to apply common sense or better, to use a Catalan word, seny (roughly translates to "good and common sense").
Now, what common sense tells us is that if someone was to classify an ancient bust found in Norway, and if this bust showed the characteristics that are being discussed here (Nordid/Mediterranid gracile type), in case of doubt no one would dare classify the bust as Mediterranean. Even when there exists the possibility of Atlanto-Mediterranean seafarers arriving to the coasts of Norway in the Antiquity.
The discussion on how similar it is to a given Nordid type, however, would be perfectly within rational parameters.
Likewise, it is far from being rational to classify as Nordid a type bust from the Ancient Mediterranean world, which shows Mediterranean traits of the type shared between Nordics and Mediterraneans. I would expand more here, but I don't think it necessary.
Therefore, it is absolutely mandatory that people realize that, even if not done with intentionality (Nordicist or Mediterraneanist),
such bizarre and dare I say outrageous classifications are sensed as offensive by the groups of people native to the type in question.
We must also not forget that Günther was a Nordicist, and not just but among the worse in his kind. Consequently, if we give up to such
ideologies which are the product of an aggressive, nonsensical and dare I say anti-European Nordo-Germanic supremacism, we (we as the non Nordo-Germanic Europeans) might as well realize of the need to accept the challenge (or, to use Castilian bullfight jargon,
entrar al trapo, lit.: "to enter in the cloth (cape)", i.e. "to fall into the trick") and to realize that there exists a real conflict with the Nordo-Germanic world.
A conflict which I would identify as of a similar magnitude to the threat of non European immigration invasion. Thus, not being enough with the conflict of immigration, we are faced with the conflict of an agressive ideology from the past, which is Nordo-Germanic supremacism, or simply Nordo-Germanicism.
Stirpes was founded because of the need to provide a safe haven against Nordo-Germanic supremacism for true Nationalist Preservationists in Europe. At the time there was Skadi forum which advertised as for the European spiritual, cultural, racial, etc. preservation. However a mask for the most infamous kind of Nordicism in its version of Nordo-Germanicism.
Their alleged European external image attracted a number of other Europeans apart from the Germans, and many American White Trash
tourists. The first victim of this Nordo-Germanic supremacism were the Eastern Europeans. Under the promotion of the owner of Skadi, some Germanic Europeans and many Americans (only God knows what they really are, but allegedly Germanics), targeted the Slavs first.
Not an agressiveness that has remained in the past as a stupid mistake, as some will remember that Skadi's owner was not long along on Stirpes performing a personal and sick slander of the Slavs.
Soon they focused on another group, the Southern Europeans. The agressiveness escalated until reaching points of true madness.
The wounds that this agressive Nordo-Germanic supremacism provoked are still much alive in the mind of many. And although nowadays Skadi Nordo-Germanic supremacists restrain themselves (leaving their true being for the forum Free Speech, hidden from the public view), they are still much alive. Suffice to show this comment from a long-serving European Germanic member of Skadi (on Skadi thread "
Isn\'t this a Germanic site?"):
"Some (controversial?) opinions on the "Germanic" issue. When I registered, Skadi was a "European preservation" forum, dedicated not only to the Germanic, but to all European cultures and subraces, in Europe as well as in the colonies. Personally I prefer to see the change of policy as more of a practical issue than an ideological one -- namely, that of avoiding bloody ethnical conflicts among moderators (I think Thorburn wrote about this earlier). Accordingly, perhaps the present policy should be considered as a matter of Germanic rule and sovereignity, for the sake of peace and order (we do not lack historical parallels! ), rather than as an exlusively Germanic focus of the discussion."
Nordo-Germanic supremacism is, without a hint of doubt, a real threat to a Europe of Free Nations. While no one has the right to object to a separation of the Germanic nations if they so wish, there exists an inalienable right to oppose the agression in whichever form it comes.
So the question is who are our enemies.