[Spartadux]

Originally Posted by Mynydd

No, you are not. Your construction of sentences in English does not follow a structure and this often gives the appearance of your statements being inconnexed. It is a bit hard to make sense of most of it. .

maybe i wrong because i often write in hurry so i can confuse myself with some words.

.[/quote]If it's a habit on other sites, why bringing it here then? You wouldn't want it to become a habit here too, would you?.[/quote]
No i don't want, but the bad habit is not rightly mine, i'm rather on the opposite view of those examples i did before. So it is clear i did such examples ad bad examples and not certainly as "my examples".

Originally Posted by Mynydd

It would be even worse --in fact much worse-- if this statement implied that the assimilation of large numbers of non European colonials of European descent would be any good for Europe..

Here it has been a huge misunderstanding about my thoughts, i was not referring to a mass immigration neither to a mass immigration from colonies. I was talking about "similia cum similia" coming from Europe as a continent from POrtugal to Moskow including Malta on south and Iceland to North. All folks related to this area is European folk also if , i would be blind at contrary, there are different ethnic groups and different nationals.
BUT... the differences are evident but not a weapon of dismissing of the culture and race of a single nationality as it would be mass immigration from Ghana, Nigeria, Pakistan, maghreb and other kinds of immigration.

Looking at the actual and present immigration i' d rather prefer, and i wrote it different times, a different balance of number of immigrants coming from other european countries or coming from countries which belonged to us. The requisite is the origin of the "migrantes": if those are originated from Europe (Italians in Argentina and Brasil, Euro-Ispanic from South America, Irish and french and Italians or easterns from USA or Canada) i don't have problems to such arrivals.
I have problems and not small problems if those are blacks and arabs so an ex colony does not mean i want nigerians and pakis and west-indians because they were ex colonies.
But i don't go further in explanating this because is obvious, on the contrary i'd not be here but in the NO-Global forum or in http://www.indymedia.org.

Originally Posted by Mynydd

That's alright, but I insist that it is not an issue here..

you got the point of what i was thinking with the concept of vitality, but i don't follow you when you say is not part of the topic. IS THE MAIN PART OF THE topic here because on the contrary we would have not faced the problems we are living in Europe.
If we are in this swamp is because we don't have will neither strenght to opposite the multicultural globalization defending our folks and political indipendence. Is more strong the folk of Boer in Africa of South: they are a minority but none of them is annihilated by globalization and illusions. On a side we have a III world full of resentements and will to come here and taking places whatever we think or not. ON our side, in Europe, we have "peace and love".
If we don't solve this we don't understand how to face immigration and which kind of migration we can choose and accept.

Originally Posted by Mynydd

There is no one 'European ethnicity' in Europe, but several. I take it that your concern is that there have been people who have equated European to Nordid or even Nordoid..

Yes there have been such statements but they were wrong and i'm totally on different opinions.

Originally Posted by Mynydd

Well, that is sadly the case when one individual has a view of the world limited to his small village environment and then comes out of it to be confronted with a complex reality which he is unable to process and to assimilate in his brain..

Not my case, i've travelled in several lands of Europe and i'm quite confident with the issue of different ethnic groups of Europe, we are different but if we want to preserve European identity there would have been in my opinion something which brings to us the idea of a common destiny and identity.
Anyway another guy very smart said that an acceptable immiggration is the immigration wich takes assimilation of its people within a generation or two. Differentely is a bad affair and i agree.