In Defense of Eurosiberia
Between 4-6 November it was held near Segorbe the II Symposium of
Tierra y Pueblo, which we were honoured to attend [...]
This was not a formal meeting where to find any "homologation" with other European parties. This was about the exchange of ideas, communication of projects and of analysis of the situation. It is worth to outline what was dealt with in those days.
Enrique Ravello, president of TyP, opened the symposium by lightening three candles: one to remember our ancestors, one to remember our community, and one to evoke the compromise with our children. These three candles stayed on during the three days that lasted the symposium. Right after, he made a general introduction to the conference establishing the differences between the geopolitical concept of "Eurasia", too wide to be able to have a political projection, and the much more viable and realistic concept of "Eurosiberia", i.e. Europa + Russia and her Siberian extension. Ravello defined geopolitics as an auxiliary science to political sciences and, therefore, with an indicative but not determining value. The Eurosiberian possibility suposses a formidable axis of power, able to counter the North American unilateralism and to open new spaces of civilisation and culture for our block of power.
The turn of the communications was opened by Carlos Doufur, an Argentinean professor of philosophy in Germany, who made an interesting analysis on the structure of the system and on its posibilities to be reformed. Modern democracies are becoming increasingly less representatives and transformed in plutocracies where the true power is money, and where any other consideration --"democracy as the power of the people"-- is a mere resource of demagogy. Doufur ended his communication proposing some viable corrections inside the system, appealing to the new information technologies.
The former leader of Terza Posizione,
Gabriele Adinolfi, who had suffered imprisonment and exile, analyzed the structures of world power. He explained that the State, the only which could react before the phenomenon of globalisation, has an existance which in increasingly fading. Power is no longer in the hands of some organisms democratically elected, but on the hands of the world power organisations which draw the lines that the world must follow, something that today can still be considered a task of the governments. The analysis of such organisation allowed Adinolfi to be in conditions to define the origin and the composition of these structures of world power.
A former leader of Ordine Nuovo since the 50s and currently director of the magazine
Identità, Salvatore Francia, described the path of this organisation which was inspired after Julius Evola's
Rivolta contro il mondo moderno and
Gli uomine e le rovine. Francia explained that Ordine Nuovo, an Italian organisation from its origins, always felt the spirit of Europe. He emphasised when describing what was the integration of Pino Rauti in the MSI during 1969 and the transformation of the
Centro de Studi Ordine Nuovo into
Movimento Politico Ordine Nuovo. He reminded that those who integrated inside the MSI together with Rauti did not manage to take the MSI out of its moderated dynamic and, a few years later, the MPON had become the victim of provocation and of a generalised represion, while the MSI had been unable to overcome the electoral limit that already had in the 50s.
Pierre Krebs, a Franco-German intellectual adscribed to the ideas of the Nouveau Droite, and a broadcaster of such ideas, dedicated some initial words to remind that the Germany of 1945 had been defeated but not humiliated, and that it was thanks to the generation which was formed in the schools of National Socialism that it was possible to reconstruct the country after the 1945 tragedy. Germany, said Krebs, was only humiliated after the generation of 1969, the first generation forged in the schools and the principles of the winners. After this introduction, Krebs reviewed the main problem of modern Germany: Turkish immigration. Krebs explained the excesses committed in the policies of "assimilation" of the Turkish minority, and the lack of results. He also explained that in 2005 a part of this German political class continues accomodated in the implants of the winners and with the backs to the German tradition and to the interests of the German nation. Krebs ended his turn forseeing the awakening of the energies of Germany within the frame of a new awakening of Europe.
Pierre Vial started his speech transmitting the last news on the ethnic war that in those precise moments (the weekend 5-6 of November) had reached its highest peaks. Vial showed happy that the insurgents had attacked the neighbourhoods of the bourgeoisie: this way the bourgeoise is going to realize that this is not an imaginary enemy, and that no one is safe in his neighbourhoods. Vial went on declaring: "The ethnic war has started". He then went to the subject of his conference: a report on the current situation of Russia and her role in the awakening of Euro-Siberia. Vial explained the essential landmarks of the history of Russia. The role of the Varengians --arrived from the North-- in the making of the historical kernel of Russia, is central to understand the current course of the events. During centuries, Russia was in the first line of the fight against Islam, and this historical clash has marked the profound psychology of that country. Vial went then on to examine the current situation in Russia, highlighting the fact that President Putin has put much emphasis in dearticulating the "oligarchy" which, during the period of Boris Eltsin, managed to impoverish the wealth of the Russian nation and to appropriate itself of a de-statalized industry. This gesture extols the person of Putin beyond any other critique that could be made to his policies. The extermination of Chechen terrorists is, likewise, a point in favour of Putin who has decided to return her lost dignity to Russia, after the fall of Communism. Gestures like the return of the ashes of General Denikin or that of the warning to the protagonists of the "orange revolution", favoured by the U.S. in Ukraine, are sufficiently illustrative that Russia is raising again. Today, Russia cannot be considered by the European militants as a frontier, but as a part of an European territorial space. Ethnically, the Slavs are a branch of the Indo-Europeans, similar to the other groups that populate the European continent in everything. Thanks to Vial we could understand a bit better the need to stop speaking of "Eurasia" (a geopolitical concept which is ambiguous, vague and impossible to crystalize) to speak of "Eurosiberia", the geopolitical space of the future.
In the morning of the 6th of November, I the chance to expose before the assistants the gravity of the situation with Morocco, where I resumed the actual phase of the conflict. On the one side, I exposed the doctrine of National Defense and its evolution since the 50s. I focused on the geopolitical role of Spain and the axis Canaries-Gibraltar-Balearics, as a new basic concept for our defense. I also explained how this idea has gone on evolving since Franco until the government of Zapatero. Then I concluded that a national defense precises to define the "enemy" and that, for the strategists of Defense --not so for the political class-- there is only one enemy and this lies in the South: in Morocco. From that point on we defined the main fronts of conflict: oil, Ceuta, Melilla, the delimitation of the seas, the fifth column which is the immigration, terrorism, etc. In the following days I will publish some of these subjects in
infoKrisis.
This second symposium of
Tierra y Pueblo was closed by Andreas Molau, director fo
Deutsche Stimme, the magazine of the
NPD. He spoke of the growth that his party had experienced since Udo Voigt leads it. We could understand perfectly how the German leading class practices some kind of masochism against the patriots, and gives itself to the Turkish minority. Molau also explained the perspectives which open in 2006 for the NPD, which will go together with the DVU of Dr. Gerhard Frey to the partial elections in two landers.
To put an end to this symposium a message of hope in our peoples and etnias was repeated in the different European languages. Pierre Vial, as president of Terre et Peuple, the matrix, read the the message of future in the ancient language of our ancestors, Latin. The three candles which represented our ancestors, ourcommunity and our children, were put off, concluding this way the II Symposium of Tierra y Pueblo.
Like the men who travelled from Northern Europe used to say:
"love your wife, honour your land, defend your children". Such is the code, the only code that we can assume in these times of crisis.
by Ernesto Milà -- infoKrisis