[Eriugena]

Originally Posted by Mr Curzon Biggles

Well i dont know, im against the war in Iraq which is a primarily American thing, i havent been arrested for it, in the former Soviet Union i might of .

Why are you against the war in Iraq?

You call Churchill a liar,a war-monger & a pig so its pretty obvious you have some discomfort over the man, i dont believe ive said anything derogatory towards Hitler, the moment i saw those insults towards Churchill i sort of lost interest in your argument.

You seem to take everything very personally. You are not Churchill. There is a lot of myth surrounding Churchill but with very little digging you will discover what he was really made of: crap. His whole career was littered with disasters and brutality - Gallipoli for example. Fresh from destroying thousands of Australian and New Zealanders lives he moved on to wreak havoc in the Middle East. Did you know he gassed the Kurds and Iraqis? That's right, the newly formed air force was used to drop poison gas on Iraqi civilians in 1919 [Air Power and Colonial Control: The Royal Air Force 1919-1939 by David E. Omissi Manchester Univ Pr (December 1, 1990)]. You m,ight like to check out what he did to the Cossacks after the war: Operation Keelhaul. He was a man who formed a hatred of Germany early on and dedicated his political career to destroying it even if it meant destroying Britain - which he did. You cannot run from the facts of this man's life. He was a disaster for Britain first and foremost as well as for the world.

Churchill was buddies with "uncle-joe" because we both had the same enemy, "the enemy of my enemy is my friend", he did say once "If Hitler invaded hell id be hard pressed not to make an alliance with the devil".

This is entirely circular and question-begging: he made Germany into Britain's enemy.

Really every time i look over this, it just looks more and more like disgruntled hitbacks, the fact its 3 people whose countries have both suffered from the British telling me how bad Britains wartime leader is, is to expected to really believe what they are saying without grinning.

More evasiveness. Do you really think anyone is impressed by this blatant refusal to face up to the facts of the past - as opposed to pure myth and invention? I have alreay provided you with a number of ENGLISH sources which will give a very different picture of history than one that comes out of the idiot box in the corner.