View Single Post
  #25 (permalink)     Quote this post in a PM
Old Tuesday, January 4th, 2005
Eriugena's Avatar
Eriugena Eriugena is offline
Member
 
Last Online: Thursday, March 6th, 2008 18:21
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 215
Eriugena is noble of speech.Eriugena is noble of speech.
Default Re: Your views on Christianity

Quote:
Originally Posted by Awar
??? So ??? Calvin was 8 yrs old when Martin Luther ( a German ) was the most active... and ... surprise surprise, Protestantism is predominant in Germanic countries.
In answer to your point about Protestantism being Germanic - the most Jew-friendly brand of Protestantism is Francophone in origin,

Quote:
So, let me get this clear. You think that Christianity would be better-off without the bible. ( must be hard to explain ALL THOSE Old Testament imagery in the sistine chapel )
It may suprise you to learn that is precisely what the Marcionite church did. It rejected the Bible and the Jewish elements. It retained only one Gospel and a few Pauline letters for its canon.
Quote:
So, then, what's the basis of Catholicism? In Hellenistic faith?
Then, why not just revive the hellenistic faith?
The basis of Catholicism? As I said, a mixture of Hellenism and Judaism.

Quote:
So, which country isn't? Iran...
Pretty much all, but this discussion has a historical dimension.


Quote:
Must be because the Anglo states have the South American states in THEIR pocket.
Very possibly.

Quote:
Which has ...what exactly... to do with your claim of Catholicism being the "best defense against Jews and the NWO" ?
Because Catholic beliefs and doctrines are antithetical to what the NWO stands for.

Quote:
The point is to explain why there aren't as many Jews there now, as there were before WW2. Poland, and other Catholic European countries don't have as many Jews now, as they had before the WW2. ( for whatever reason, but it explains your statement that "there are less Jews in Catholic countries" ).
There is a misunderstanding here. I did not say there were less Jews in Catholic countries, I said that they tended to do better in Protestant countries. Of course you are right to say that increased secularisation tends to negate these factors.

Quote:
So, you see, it has nothing to do with the religion of the country in which they are "parasites" it has more to do with the geopolitical strength of the given country. From Islamic empires, British Empire all the way to USSR and USA.
To some extent - but that power can be minimised in a state where there are limitations on the rights of those who do not subscribe to the majority religion as there were in Catholic countries of old. Btw, I am not recommending any of this, just observing it.


Quote:
I'm sorry, but theocratic states proved to be disastrous compared to Secular states. In any case, the rulers of any state, be it secular or religious are realists ( the successful ones, at least ).
Again, you seem to think I am commending it.
Quote:
It's dangerous to have institutions of state being tied with any religion.
Because religions, being irrational, are not a good basis for everyday institutions.
You live in hope, becaue there is an irrational basis for all states, or, rather there is no purely rational basis for any existing state.


Quote:
You "know" the Jews hate "something", based on what?
Are you seriously disputing that the Jews are anti-Catholic?

Quote:
An ordinary Jew hates the Palestinians, but a Jewish leader finds the Palestinians quite useful. How do you know that the heads of Jews don't
actually like something that just appears to be bad for them. Superficially.
Of course they do. This is why they have 'antisemitism'; a very powerful binding agent for organised Jewry to keep the rank and file in line.

Quote:
A catholic villager somewhere in Spain, or a godfearing catholic woman in Ireland or Croatia don't exactly have much say in anything really. In a similar way, an ordinary Israeli, or an ordinary Serb, or Russian, or Swede have little to do with what the 'grey heads' decide on something.
True, but in Catholic socities, where ordinary people follow their Church's teachings, NWO finds it more difficult to make inroads than in Protestant countries. For example, the family is the core of the Catholic idea of community, not just the immediate family but the extended family. The family is a bulwark against what the NWO offers, which prefers to atomise communities into a 'society' of individual worker-consumers. Individuals are way more manipulable than members of families, communities etc.
Reply With Quote