Quote:
Originally Posted by Lakedaemon
Typically a thirteen year old girl is not a child but an adolescent. But apart from that the offender is the child itself so there are no incentives for sexual abusing.
|
It is by sure a non mature human, both physically and mentally, and by law pedophilia is the crime committed by who takes advantage of that immaturity.
Now you can waste your time by criticizing the name because "technically" pedo- means only "child" (i'm not even sure about that), but it wouldn't change the coward exploitation of a young human.
------------
The offender produces material forbidden by law, so committing a crime; it has no relevance against whom the crime is committed because 1) a 13 years old has no power/right to take certain decisions because she/he is not ready 2) as I pointed out, it's not a mere self-portrait but a content sent to others, and in many cases it's not another teen but a grown up. at best, it's enticing another teen, which is a crime
------------
by the way, are you defending those practices? because at that point I don't know what you do on a nationalist, traditionalist forum: I don't think any nationalist/traditionalist would bolster this kind of things.
it is true that ancient Greece accepted pedophilia, but I was convinced times changed. am I in the wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lutiferre
Funny with a society that isn't at all worried about and even encourages teenage promiscuity, but nude pictures of teenagers is suddenly something we have to be worried about. Both are evils, but it doesn't make much sense to condemn one without condemning the other.
|
it is clearly some vestigial element of pre-modern memory. however you are right, both phenomena should be eradicated and I pray God to make me live enough to see that happening