Quote:
Originally Posted by Susi
To me the first step of separating the union is to cleanse it from the multicultural and multiracial view.
|
The very Union its self is multicultural and, (though it can be debated..) mutliracial. Scotland hasn't had the full impact of non-European immigration
yet, so we need to get out fo the Union ASAP. Screw trying to "cleanse" Britain, the longer it stays together, the worse for us.
Quote:
|
Britain (as in the Isles), as it was known many years ago ago wasn't full of blacks and indians. Should I also say that the assemblies and parliaments of Europe should be full of blacks and indians and so forth because otherwise they couldn't perfectly represent "Spanishness" or "Frenchness" and so forth? Or do neither of these nations have an imperial history either?
|
France and Spain are Nations however and not just states that are based on mutlicultural and, (again, can be debated..) mutliracial concepts.
Quote:
|
Most "subjects of the Commonwealth" are no longer considered British, in Canada, before 1947 they were given British citizenship, but afterwards, they were merely Canadian.
|
And.. ?
Quote:
|
I know the situation of "Britain" is hardly ideal for us (I'm looking at you, the one with the name I dare not attempt to type because I don't feel like making four key strokes per accent ,-,).
|
Don't use the accents

I wont complain.
Quote:
|
But to allow it to degenerate beyond repair dooms our attempts to get rid of it and still emerge relatively unscathed.
|
Like i've said, the sooner Scotland gets out of the Union, the better. We wont have to worry about non-Europeans as much as England, because they make up such a small percent of the population.
So, I don't think Scotland needs to worry about "cleansing" the UK to emerged as unscathed as possible, we just need to get out of it

.