[Aptrgangr]

Originally Posted by Mynydd

Both Greenland and Iceland were formally colonies of Norway. Even when in the case of Iceland, the natives were Scandinavians themselves.[/

I know this, still the situation can not be compared with the colonialization today, I already explained it: we are under siege by foreign colonists that are brought in here to destroy our nation from within (a Green politican openly said: we must destroy Germany from within). I am well aware the Norwegians invaded Scotland and Ireland, still the consequences were not as dramatic as the colonialization of our nations with millions of foreigners.

Originally Posted by Mynydd

Greenland was settled by the Inuits before the Norse.

What makes you sure it was like that? Actually the Inuit arrived at the same time like the Vikings did.

Originally Posted by Mynydd

It doesn't matter that these Inuits were few in numbers. Not that you could expect that environment to support large populations, especially in those times.

The Inuit are used to live in this environment, they colonialized Greenland after migrating from the north American continent - they followed seals and other animals they hunted after those started wandering due to climatic changes.

Originally Posted by Mynydd

But if that's not enough, then what do you call the Norwegian ruling over Sami settlements in Scandinavia?

I am never in favour in ruling over other people, but the Vikings respected the Saami people, it was the modern kingdoms and democracies that made them subjects. Today Saami in Norway and Sweden are grated rights Norwegians and Swedes only can dream about.

Originally Posted by Mynydd

To hide behind a pretention of noble savage and civilized character, is very poor.

The more civilized the more barbaric a civilization is. You won't find Bushmen butchering millions of their unborn babies - we do that and consider ourselves as cream of civilizations, and look down to these "primitives".

Originally Posted by Mynydd

The creation of a European indigenous initiative can only be based on true and dignifying bases, not on cheap pseudo-indigenism.

Anything related to European indigenous heritage will be outlawed as "Racism", "Nazism" and "Fascism" anyway.

Originally Posted by Mynydd

The one reason that the perservation of European peoples is most important, is the value of their heritages.

I agree totally, but you can not deny big mosques meanwhile belong to "our heritage".

Originally Posted by Mynydd

If you cannot preserve them in their dignity, then the whole idea becomes worthless.

I can not preserve anyone else, everyone must to this for her/his own.