View Single Post
  #43 (permalink)     Quote this post in a PM
Old Wednesday, March 26th, 2008
Ostrogorski Ostrogorski está offline
Senior Member
 
Last Online: Thursday, May 29th, 2008 13:30
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 390
Ostrogorski 's opinion is sought out by learned men.Ostrogorski 's opinion is sought out by learned men.Ostrogorski 's opinion is sought out by learned men.Ostrogorski 's opinion is sought out by learned men.
Default Re: Illyrians are the ancestors of the Albanians?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monolith View Post
Vlachs were (and still are) the Romance-speaking Balkan natives. The fact that the contemporary Albanians aren't romanized doesn't mean that they're not indigenous. Most of the Romance-speaking populations lived in, or near the coastal and inland cities. Those who lived in the hinterland or mountains were their non-romanized kinsmen.

Look at the Romanians, for example. Their language was a sui generis Romance-Slavic hybrid until the 19th century. You see, the situation was a bit complicated back then, so I don't think that the case is clear.
Yes, but you're assuming that they're indigenous per se, but that claim has yet to be proven by facts. So far no one provided any potential evidence to prove this claim, except few quasi-historical rants by the members of Berlin-Vienna school for the sake of Drang nach Osten politics. And Albanian ethnic name first emerges in history around 11th century AD, while last historical mention of some Illyrian tribal name is somewhere during Roman times. Not even the brightest history forger can fill that historical gap of almost 8 centuries...
Reply With Quote