Quote:
Originally Posted by EagleEye
The facts are that arabid and mediterranean are closely related. If you deny it, you are probably trying to promote unity between europeans at the expense of the true revelations that anthropology reveal. This is what it appeared the opening poster was doing (if you carefully analyze the post), and the other two posters correctly refuted him. The fact that you feel compelled to censor me will only feed my confidence. Your forum is simply a small player in a big game.
|
I'm afraid you are not a leptodolychomorph - thus you won't be able to vaunt any morphological relation with Nordids, Mediterranids, Arabids and Indids altogether.
Maybe you belong to the brachycephalic club, as I do. It's the harsh reality of having a cephalic index above 80. I hope you are a progressive, slender leptoprosopic Dinaroid like me (hey, long face is more manly and attractive), and not one of those squat, yellowish critters one can find in the horror descriptions of Günther's
ostische and
ostbaltische Rassen.
Now don't take this personally - I'm on your side. If the now suppressed "true revelations that anthropology reveal" were finally disclosed to the public, maybe it will be easier for us Northern Italians to split from Sergi's Eurafrican long-heads. Maybe. In fact I deem convenient to inform you, that in matters of identity and ethnicity, nobody gives a damn about anthropometric measurements.