Re: On Christianity and Tradition [split]
What I'm saying is that he's American, it's a waste of time to argue with someone who writes
Quote:
|
What I don't understand though is why so many European nationalists cling so heavily to Christianity when it is essentially an imported religion.
|
I could go explaining into details why, but then again what good would that do? Why would I explain to someone tausands of km away about Catholic tradition of Europe? Or whether Christianity is imported or not when he himself is imported into some other world that has nothing to do with Europe.
However I do agree at some level with him here..
Quote:
|
Europeans have definitely made Christianity into a religion of their own but that does not change its roots. We have more ancient traditions which created the great empires and cultures of our ancestors.
|
...With few exceptions - You have don't really have ancient tradition, but tradition and culture which includes Mickey Mouse, McDonalds and Captain America. It has nothing to do with Catholicism or Christianity in any way.
__________________
"The two-party-system and the artificial division between left and right is especially malign because it confines people into mental prisons, from which they are almost not able to get out. Even in a one-party-system it is mentally easier to be "in the opposition", "against the system". In the two-party-system (which is in fact one-party-system as well), on the other hand, if the left is currently in the office and you are opposed to the system, it is automatically assumed that you are a "rightist", ie. supporter of the party of the right. And vice versa. Most people refuse to see that the two major parties are in fact one and the same party. Thus the liberal democracy, especially in its venomous two-party variety, is the most successful system of totalitarian manipulation ever invented. Each of the two parties usually has a very dedicated voting herd, needless to say."
- "Marcus Marulus", Stirpes forum member
|